It is a state of change due to demographics like age and diseases such as dementia, and physical disabilities including stroke and Parkinson’s. In this regard, Caring Ltd; a semi-rural domiciliary care agency in Sussex offers personalised services for the elderly and other service users with multiple sclerosis or learning disabilities.
Research aim
The primary aim of this research project is to critically evaluate and enhance the effectiveness of training programs in fostering health and safety awareness among professionals in domiciliary care settings.
Research questions
To what extent do training programs contribute to the development of health and safety awareness among professionals in domiciliary care settings?
Objectives
To evaluate how current training programs impact health and safety awareness among domiciliary care professionals.
To determine areas where existing training programs lack in addressing specific health and safety needs in domiciliary care.
To analyze the real-world application of training in improving health and safety practices in caregiving settings.
To propose targeted improvements to enhance the efficacy of training programs in promoting health and safety.
Literature Review
Effectiveness of Training Programs in Domiciliary Care
Several dimensions can be observed when the literature used in domiciliary care training programs is reviewed, and these become focal points (Pulatsu et al., 2020). To begin with, these types of programs are evaluated in terms of the knowledge and practical skills they can deliver to nurses intended for providing quality care (Pulatsu et al., 2020). Research usually focuses on the readiness of caregivers to deal with conditions typical for home-based settings, such as dementia or physical disorders and chronic diseases (Alvariza et al., 2020). Alvariza et al., (2020) evaluate the training methodologies coming from more conventional class-centered approaches to eLearning and virtual environments based on information retention as well as application in practice. Yet another critical factor of effective training is the impact it has on general care quality, which can be noticed through improved patient satisfaction satisfied reduced number service errors and increased clinical staff self-confidence ( Alvariza et al.,2020).
The impact of training is another important factor to consider, especially considering the high turnover rates in healthcare (Mengstie, 2020). Effective training is, therefore, viewed as a means not only for improving skill but also in ensuring the appreciation of staff skills and self-satisfaction which leads to better retention rates (Mengstie, 2020). Moreover, the trainings should be real-time depending on the dynamic nature of home based care demands. This also encompasses their immediate reaction to emerging health issues and the level they can have prepared caregivers for a wide range of complex cases (Mengstie, 2020).
Compliance with regulatory standards and legal as well as ethical aspects of care constitute another important indicator for the effectiveness of training (Amann et al., 2020). The literature stresses the need for training programs that not only provide rich content but are also practically applicable so caregivers can implement it confidently, thus meeting industry standards and regulatory requirements (Amann et al., 2020). Feedback mechanisms and incorporating continuous improvement strategies in training programs, including the changing nature of caregiver feedback influencing patient outcomes is also investigated (Amann et al., 2020). Lastly, cost-effectiveness and availability of these training programs are discussed especially in terms of their scope as well as the applicability for caregivers based at different locations including semi rural areas such that where Caring Ltd operates (Scope, Bhadhuri and Pennington, 2022). This holistic perspective on the evaluation of training programs’ efficacy clearly highlights different aspects (Scope, Bhadhuri and Pennington, 2022).
Health and Safety Challenges in Domiciliary Care
The area of domiciliary care, which entails health services provision in the client’s household setting has an inherent distinction associated with both safety and security challenges (Juhila, Löfstrand and Raitakari, 2020). The home environments are quite distinctive with different types of risks and also requirements depending on the type (Juhila, Löfstrand and Raitakari, 2020). The caregivers working in domiciliary settings have to adapt from highly varying conditions, ranging from well-maintained spaces with reasonable safety precautions to untidy spaces without enough lighting (Juhila, Löfstrand and Raitakari, 2020). In these settings, the threat of physical injury is one key issue; some examples include manual handling for customers and balancing slips, trips and falls especially where space constraints are further complicated by an a home environment.
Another important aspect is health risks and infection control. While dominated healthcare facilities have medical-grade sanitization and equipment that is standardized, domiciliary care settings elevate the need for proficiency of these practices by trained crowd miners (Sharifi et al., 2021). Psychosocial risks are also important; caregivers work alone, face demanding behaviors and suffer emotionally with intense caring that results in excessive stress and risk for burnout (Sharifi et al., 2021).
Another important topic mentioned in the literature is emergency preparedness (Aruru, Truong and Clark, 2020). The caregivers should be experts on handling different emergencies such as medical accidents and sexual assaults, which requires effective emergency training together with specific protocol (Zhang et al., 2023). In addition to this, the personalized nature of domiciliary care in which each client may have individual health challenges for example dementia or Parkinson’s needs very flexible and refined approaches from carers (Zhang et al., 2023).
A significant hurdle is meeting the regulatory requirements that are fluid and dynamic within home environments (McLaughlin et al., 2023). Domiciliary care environment is marked by a lack of uniformity, making it necessary for the providers to be familiar with health and safety regulations. It is the literature that highlights how critical continuous training and support for caregivers as a comprehensive learning process are not only to ensure ability of initiation but also adaptation in dealing with multifarious risks (Højlund and Villadsen, 2020). This diverse and dynamic setting of health and safety in domiciliary homes calls for a multipronged approach, hence the need to emphasize on thorough training, adaptability as well as support structures that guarantee both providers’ satisfaction and clients’ (Højlund and Villadsen, 2020).
Gap Between Training and Practice
In the literature, a wide chasm can be noted between training that is received by caregivers in home-based settings and realities of practice on them every day (Saunders et al., 2021). Training programs seek to provide caregivers with the necessary knowledge and skills, but in-home care settings often introduce unpredictable situations that necessitate improvisation and rapid decision making (Saunders et al., 2021). Caregivers must deal with the translation of skills learned in controlled training environments into practical real world situations even as they take on clients that have varied needs (Saunders et al., 2021).
The deficit between theory and practice in the home care setting is aggravated by such resource constraints as lack of readily accessible medical equipment, support teams (Sinclair et al., 2021). Moreover, the emotional and psychologic components of caregiving which are not fully dealt with during training can present unpredictable difficulties to such individuals, affecting their capability in delivering wholesome nursing (Sinclair et al., 2021).
Additionally, the lack of ongoing education workshops and trainings would lead to a tendency in provision of care with outdated knowledge that does not reflect current practices; particularly for healthcare settings where regulatory standards are frequently updated (Sinclair et al., 2021). Filling this void requires a more comprehensive and flexible design of training which resembles the complexities involved in home care (Fu et al., 2022). Also, there should be some feedback mechanisms to help in informing training improvements and it is necessary that the care givers are prepared well enough for changing needs of their roles. The literature emphasizes the importance of having to update training programs so they are more in line with real-life experiences and challenges care givers encounter during domiciliary care (Fu et al., 2022). Therefore, such a move will not only improve quality matters but also increase efficiency of delivery process as well (Fu et al., 2022).
Innovations and Best Practices in Training
Innovations and best practices in training within the domiciliary care sector spur them with skills to be equipped for all issues that affect this discipline (Carayannis & Morawska-Jancelewicz, 2022). Given this, the literature presents a changing landscape of approaches to training methodologies that take into account different innovative aspects and fit both concerns for caregivers as well as client needs (Carayannis & Morawska-Jancelewicz, 2022).
One of the major best practices is blended learning approaches (Anthony et al., 2020). Considering the current research on caregivers’ diverse learning habits and varied backgrounds, modern training programs often apply multiple techniques (Anthony et al., 2020). This can include classical traditional classroom training for fundamental knowledge, and e-learning methods that provide convenience and availability. Trainers are able to engage with training materials through blended strategies in a flexible way (Anthony et al., 2020).
Technology is an essential driver of innovation in the training systems (Chohan and Hu, 2020). That is, by utilizing the power of modern technology to create realistic virtual models and interactive digital environments (Chohan & Hu, 2020). In addition, this practical and behavioral application becomes easier for caregivers to comprehend with the help of simulations in virtual domiciliary settings (Chohan & Hu, 2020). These advances in technology not only help make training more efficient but also highlight the emergence of digitalization of education within health care.
Scenario-based training is another aspect of good practices (Almazova et al., 2021). Using simulation, training programs enable caregivers to practice real home situations. They can be able to practise decision-making, problem solving and communication skills under the safe environment This orientation is extremely useful in the face of the instability that characterizes home care conditions, which demand quick adaptability to changing surroundings from them (Almazova et al., 2021).
Due to the increasing commonality of interprofessional training, caregivers collaborate with other health practitioners in order to form teams that are multidisciplinary (Ngangue et al., 2021). Training focusing on nurses, therapists, social workers and caregivers represent a multidisciplinary perspective for the nature of caring across disciplines promoting interprofessional communication understanding (Kangasniemi et al., 2021). This comprehensive approach enhances the quality as well as scope of services offered to consumers (Kangasniemi et al., 2021).
Cultural competency training is considered necessary in the domiciliary care environment where clients live in different cultures (Young and Guo, 2029). As clinicians adapt to the cultural preferences and needs of clients who are seeking treatment, they learn that their approach should be both empirically grounded with evidence supporting its effectiveness and culturally balanced.
Methodology
Research paradigm
Further, primary surveys as the preferred data collection methodologies based on which this research study sets forth its analysis of training programs from various angles since how such interventions influences home health and safety sensitization comes into perspective with domiciliary setups. In this case, secondary research comprises quantitative and qualitative data sources that serve as a basis for the synthesisation of prior knowledge or discovery from previous survey reports and literature (Farokhzadian et al., 2021).This desk research helps not only to build on solid foundations but also reveal areas in which little is known yet.
Secondary analysis is enhanced through primary surveys that also provide novel and grounded approaches Petersen et al. 2020). Such quantitative questionnaires are aimed at gathering rigid information from participants and then carrying out statistical procedures to calculate the level of professionals’ Awakening inside (Petersen et al 2020). On the other hand, qualitative tools such as deep interviews or focus groups reviews provide for more information regarding practices accepted by participants and believe on training programs effectiveness (Scheelbeek et al. 2020). Such a dual-anatomy approach enables the researchers to merge quantitative measurements with qualitative descriptions in order to get an entire measure of research questions (Scheelbeek et al. 2020).
Data collection and analysis
The data collection and analysis methodology has been found as applicable enough to answer the research questions in the context of the research paper (Hennink & Kaiser, 2022). It begins with developing a structured questionnaire that will play the role of an important tool for gathering quantitative data on awareness levels and training programs’ effectiveness in health and safety (Hennink & Kaiser, 2019). Before administration of the survey, best effort will be made to collect informed consent from 31 participants randomly drawn from Caring Ltd that ensure their voluntariness and understanding on why research conducted.
It will be much more convenient for participants in the survey administration process, as they may take their surveys online at any time. This application provides the convenience of acquiring information with a luxury time for domiciliary care specialists. Data management will be loose to ensure the privacy of participants and Discretion (Surmiak, 2019).
At the phase of data analysis, both quantitative and qualitatitve datasets will be subjected to extensive analyses. The quantitative analysis will consist of descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and in case a regressions model is to be used for the relationship between training with health and safety awareness. The clarity and readability of the findings will be increased with several charts, graphs used to help visualize survey results.
Primary research
The pie chart provides a visual distribution of age groups among 31 respondents. The largest portion of the chart is colored blue, representing 64.5% of the respondents falling into the 18 to 25 age range. This is followed by the orange segment, which indicates that 25.8% of the respondents are aged 26 to 35. A smaller red slice represents 9.7% of respondents who are between 36 to 45 years old. Finally, the smallest group, shown in green, accounts for those aged 46 and above, making up a minimal percentage of the total respondents. The chart illustrates a predominantly young demographic with the majority of participants being under 35 years old.
The pie chart shows the gender distribution of 31 respondents. A large red portion, constituting 71% of the responses, represents female respondents. The blue slice, accounting for 25.8% of the chart, indicates male respondents. A very thin orange sliver, which is not given a specific percentage value but can be inferred to represent the remaining 3.2%, is labeled as those who prefer not to say their gender.
This chart suggests that the majority of the respondents are female, with approximately three-quarters of the total number, while a quarter are male. Only a minimal number of participants chose not to disclose their gender. The significant difference between the number of female and male respondents could imply that the subject of the survey or the context in which it was conducted may be of more interest or relevance to women, or that the sampling method resulted in a gender imbalance.
According to the chart, there are 31 responses in total, and the pie chart shows that 100% of the respondents have answered "Yes" to the question. This indicates that every respondent has received formal training in health and safety protocols for their role in domiciliary care at Caring Ltd. There are no responses indicating "No" or "Maybe", as these options are not represented in the chart.
The largest segment of the chart is red, representing 58.1% of respondents who answered "Yes," indicating that they feel the training was adequate for their needs in health and safety management. The blue portion, constituting 35.5% of the responses, reflects those who answered "No," suggesting that these respondents believe the training did not adequately prepare them. The smallest slice, colored orange, shows 6.4% (calculated by exclusion from the total) of respondents are uncertain, responding "Maybe," which indicates they are unsure about the adequacy of their training. This data suggests that while a majority of the respondents feel adequately prepared by the training, there is a substantial proportion, more than a third, who either do not feel prepared or are unsure about their preparedness.
The largest portion of the chart is red, accounting for 67.7% of the responses, where participants "Agree" that the training programs effectively cover the necessary protocols. Two smaller, equal-sized segments, both 9.7%, represent those who "Strongly Agree" (blue) and "Neutral" (yellow) on the effectiveness of the training. A sliver in green indicates a smaller percentage of respondents who "Disagree" with the statement, though the exact figure is not provided but can be inferred as less than 9.7%. There is also a very small slice in purple for those who "Strongly Disagree," again the exact percentage is not specified but it is the smallest visible group in the chart.
This distribution indicates a generally positive perception of the training programs, with the majority of respondents feeling that the training is effective. However, there is a segment that is neutral, disagreeing, or strongly disagreeing, suggesting there is room for improvement in the training programs to achieve a more universally positive evaluation.
A majority, 51.6% represented by the red portion, "Agree" that the training programs provide practical scenarios that align with the challenges they encounter. The orange slice, accounting for 19.4%, indicates respondents who "Strongly Agree," suggesting a high degree of confidence in the practical applicability of the training. A smaller 12.9% (blue slice) of respondents are "Neutral," neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the statement. Those who "Disagree" (yellow slice) make up 9.7% of the responses, while a similar proportion (purple slice, also 9.7%) "Strongly Disagree."
Overall, the data suggests that more than half of the participants find the practical scenarios in the training align well with their real-world challenges. However, approximately one-fifth of respondents are not convinced of the alignment, which could indicate a need for the training programs to better tailor their practical scenarios to the specific challenges faced in domiciliary care.
A significant majority, illustrated by the red portion, which accounts for 67.7% of responses, "Agree" that regular refresher training sessions are conducted. The orange slice represents 12.9% of respondents who "Strongly Agree," indicating a high level of agreement with the statement. There's a small yellow slice, which is 9.7% of the responses, indicating those who are "Neutral" on this matter. The blue and purple slices, both at 9.7%, represent the respondents who "Disagree" and "Strongly Disagree," respectively.
A vast majority, signified by the red portion of the chart, which is 67.7%, "Agree" with the statement, indicating a strong belief in the importance of health and safety awareness. A significant 16.1% (orange slice) "Strongly Agree," reinforcing the sentiment with a higher level of conviction. Meanwhile, a smaller 9.7% (yellow slice) of respondents are "Neutral," neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the statement. The green and purple slices, both at a minimal 9.7% combined, represent the minority who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" with the sentiment.
This distribution highlights a predominant consensus on the significance of enhancing health and safety awareness in the provision of domiciliary care. However, a small proportion of respondents appear to be indifferent or disagree, which could reflect variances in personal experiences or perceptions of the current state of health and safety training in their roles.
A little over half of the participants, indicated by the red section, which constitutes 51.6%, "Agree" with the idea that ongoing education and enhancement in health and safety are essential for high-quality care. A sizable portion, represented in blue and accounting for 25.8%, "Strongly Agree," signalling a robust endorsement of continuous learning. The green sliver shows that 19.4% of respondents are "Neutral," neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the statement. The "Disagree" and "Strongly Disagree" categories are not represented on the chart, suggesting that none of the respondents selected these options.
This data illustrates a strong consensus among the participants on the importance of continual learning and improvement in health and safety practices, with no opposition reported in the surveyed group. This unanimity underscores a shared understanding of the dynamic nature of health and safety requirements and the importance of keeping skills and knowledge up-to-date in the domiciliary care profession.
Findings
Theme 1: Training Adequacy and Confidence in Application
Since a great proportion of the respondents state that they have been trained formally, this implies that there are established structures within the organization for initial training. However, there is an obvious group that did not receive proper training or where confused about the same. This can indicate a lack of uniformity in the provision or adoption of these training programs. In terms of transferring the training, although most caregivers claim to feel confident in their skills, there still remains a significant proportion that possesses no confidence or is undecided. This shows a difference between knowing protocols and feeling ready to apply them in practice (Burgdorf et al. 2021). It can be related to different aspects like the quality of training, individual learning style or even transferring from theory into practice (Gazzaroli et al. 20 tact ). The data show very high conviction about the need to learn and improve continuously. Domiciliary care providers understand that health and safety is not a stable entity, but practitioners do need to recognize the emergence of new knowledge, technologies and best practices. To be effective for providing the necessary training, programs need to reflect innovative trends and ensure self-adaptability by caregivers who face new problems or conditions in their environment.
Theme 2: Relevance of Training to Practical Scenarios
The applicability of training to real-life situations is one major factor that determines effectiveness in any learning process, more so in the case of heath care. The answers suggest that most of the caregivers agree that their training at Caring Ltd involves practical situations, which are related to domiciliary challenges. This is a positive result, showing that the training not only has theoretical but also practical basis in terms of daily caregiving. It symbolizes the appreciation by training program designers of situational training that readies caregivers for choices and activities essential in their roles.
However, despite this favourable general reaction, a significant number of the participants neither consider that training as addressing their practical needs or are indifferent towards it. This suggests that the training material may not match up with reality for certain caregivers (Burgdorf et al. 2021). It might be that the presented cases are too common or maybe already old and do not correspond to particular challenges some caregivers have, especially in a semi-rural area like Sussex where Caring Ltd operates. On the contrary, this could also mean that different individuals perceive and internalize training situations differently depending on their experiential or learning background.
Theme 3: Regularity of Refresher Training and Importance of Health and Safety Awareness
The frequency of refresher training and how much emphasis is given to health and safety awareness are, in fact, vital factors that contribute towards a competent workforce able to provide care. The results show that most of the caregivers under Caring Ltd support regular refresher training sessions are conducted to keep them informed on health and safety policies. This implies that the organization understands the importance of ongoing education in order to keep up with high standards and ensure employees are always aware of the latest best performance practices and regulatory requirements (Burgdorf et al. 2021). No field best demonstrates the importance of regular refresher training like domiciliary care where health and safety is a moving target due to new research findings, technology advancement and changing client profiles.
Although the majority recognizes regular refresher training, by contrast a substantial minority either disagrees with this position or simply remains undecided. This may highlight incoherencies with respect to the scheduling or communication of refresher training within this organization (Damery et al. 2021). It is also possible that some members of the staff may have scheduling conflicts, see inadequate intervals for training; or feel underserved by refresher courses when it comes to meeting individual needs and emerging trends domiciliary care (Bell et al. 2021). Furthermore, the consensus on health and safety awareness reflects a mutual appreciation among care providers of its vital role in securing client’s health.
Theme 4: Continuous Learning and Improvement
As shown in the caregivers’ responses displaying strong agreement and evidence of belief in its necessity, continuous learning and improvement is a recognized concept at Caring Ltd domiciliary service. This focus on lifelong learning has been associated with the realization by these care workers that for them to deliver quality health services, they need an ongoing process of education and skill improvement (Damery et al. 2021). Continuous learning guarantees that caregivers stay up-to-date on health and safety protocols, the changing needs of their clients, as well as welcome new best practices into everyday practice. The large consensus on the need for unceasing learning and progression points to that caregivers in Caring Ltd are not only open-minded but most likely motivated by an outlook seeking better information or skills. In the healthcare industry, this attitude is key to ensuring that stagnation does not result in outdated practices overlooked client’s security and well-being.
Conclusion
From the analysis of survey responses, it can be concluded that Caring Ltd has built a solid platform for educating caregivers about health and safety practices; most staff were satisfied with their training and determined to put this information into practice in caring for patients. This means that the first training programme was a success because it met the practical needs of care provided.
Nevertheless, the data also shed light on what needs to be done better. The training is not considered by all caregivers as fully empowering, and a small number of respondents do not experience it regularly being revised or completely covering their day-to-day challenges. This implies that although the training programs are going in the right direction, they may require to be uniformly administered and updated regularly so that all caregivers can feel equally prepared and equipped.
The uniform perception of importance placed on health and safety awareness alongside the high degree to which continuous learning is a necessity discussed indicates a workforce that both knows how but desires to improve as well. These results highlight a positive culture within the organization that represents a mutual understanding of consequences by caregivers resulting from their roles and significance to customers’ overall health.
Worried about missing out on high grades?
Achieving academic excellence isn’t easy when you’re buried under deadlines and unclear about formatting rules. Affordable Assignment Help Services offer a perfect solution—providing expert assistance across a wide range of subjects. These services ensure that each assignment is well-researched, properly cited, and customised to meet university expectations, all without breaking your budget.
References
Gazzaroli, D., D’Angelo, C. and Corvino, C., (2020). Home-Care Workers’ Representations of Their Role and Competences: A Diaphanous Profession. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, p.581399.
Burgdorf, J.G., Arbaje, A.I., Chase, J. and Wolff, J.L. (2021). Current practices of family caregiver training during home health care: A qualitative study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17492.
Damery, S., Flanagan, S., Jones, J. and Jolly, K. (2021). The Effect of Providing Staff Training and Enhanced Support to Care Homes on Care Processes, Safety Climate and Avoidable Harms: Evaluation of a Care Home Quality Improvement Programme in England. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), p.7581.
Bell, D.J., Self, M.M., Davis III, C., Conway, F., Washburn, J.J. and Crepeau-Hobson, F., (2020). Health service psychology education and training in the time of COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities. American Psychologist, 75(7), p.919.
Almazova, N., Rubtsova, A., Kats, N., Eremin, Y. and Smolskaia, N. (2021). Scenario-Based Instruction: The Case of Foreign Language Training at Multidisciplinary University. Education Sciences, 11(5), p.227. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050227.
Alvariza, A., Häger-Tibell, L., Holm, M., Steineck, G. and Kreicbergs, U. (2020). Increasing preparedness for caregiving and death in family caregivers of patients with severe illness who are cared for at home – study protocol for a web-based intervention. BMC Palliative Care, 19(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0530-6.
Amann, J., Blasimme, A., Vayena, E., Frey, D. and Madai, V.I. (2020). Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, [online] 20(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6.
Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A.F.M., Phon, D.N.A.L.E., Abdullah, A. and Ming, G.L. (2020). Blended Learning Adoption and Implementation in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Systematic Review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z.
Aruru, M., Truong, H.-A. and Clark, S. (2020). Pharmacy Emergency Preparedness and Response (PEPR) framework for expanding pharmacy professionals’ roles and contributions to emergency preparedness and response during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 17(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.04.002.
Carayannis, E.G. and Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The Futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as Driving Forces of Future Universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00854-2.
Chohan, S.R. and Hu, G. (2020). Strengthening digital inclusion through e-government: cohesive ICT training programs to intensify digital competency. Information Technology for Development, 28(1), pp.1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1841713.
Farokhzadian, J., Nematollahi, M., Dehghan Nayeri, N. and Faramarzpour, M. (2022). Using a model to design, implement, and evaluate a training program for improving cultural competence among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods study. BMC Nursing, 21(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00849-7.
Fu, Y., Hu, Y., Sundstedt, V. and Forsell, Y. (2022). Conceptual Design of an Extended Reality Exercise Game for the Elderly. Applied Sciences, [online] 12(13), p.6436. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136436.
Hennink, M. and Kaiser, B.N. (2022). Sample Sizes for Saturation in Qualitative Research: a Systematic Review of Empirical Tests. Social Science & Medicine, [online] 292(1), p.114523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523.
Højlund, H. and Villadsen, K. (2020). Technologies in caregiving: professionals’ strategies for engaging with new technology. New Technology, Work and Employment, 13(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12161.
Juhila, K., Löfstrand, C.H. and Raitakari, S. (2020). Devoted work without limits? Activities and premises of home visit work at the margins of community care. International Journal of Care and Caring, 12(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/239788220x16032965398106.
Kangasniemi, M., Karki, S., Voutilainen, A., Saarnio, R., Viinamäki, L. and Häggman?Laitila, A. (2021). The value that social workers’ competencies add to health care: An integrative review. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13266.
McLaughlin, H., Littlefield, A.A., Menefee, M., Kinzer, A., Hull, T., Sovacool, B.K., Bazilian, M.D., Kim, J. and Griffiths, S. (2023). Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: Sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, [online] 177(7), p.113215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113215.
Mengstie, M.M. (2020). Perceived organizational justice and turnover intention among hospital healthcare workers. BMC Psychology, 8(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-0387-8.
Ngangue, P.A., Forgues, C., Nguyen, T., Sasseville, M., Gallagher, F., Loignon, C., Stewart, M., Belle Brown, J., Chouinard, M. and Fortin, M. (2020). Patients, caregivers and health?care professionals’ experience with an interdisciplinary intervention for people with multimorbidity in primary care: A qualitative study. Health Expectations, 23(2), pp.318–327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13035.
Nkrumah, E.N.K., Liu, S., Doe Fiergbor, D. and Akoto, L.S. (2021). Improving the Safety–Performance Nexus: A Study on the Moderating and Mediating Influence of Work Motivation in the Causal Link between Occupational Health and Safety Management (OHSM) Practices and Work Performance in the Oil and Gas Sector. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 18(10), p.5064. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105064.
Petersen, I., Herzog, S., Bath, C. and Fleißner, A. (2020). Contextualisation of factual knowledge in genetics: A pre- and post- survey of undergraduates’ understanding of the Nature of Science. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/7816.
Pulatsu, B., Erdogmus, E., Lourenço, P.B., Lemos, J.V. and Tuncay, K. (2020). Simulation of the in-plane structural behavior of unreinforced masonry walls and buildings using DEM. Structures, 27(2), pp.2274–2287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.026.
Saunders, S., Weiss, M.E., Meaney, C., Killackey, T., Varenbut, J., Lovrics, E., Ernecoff, N., Hsu, A.T., Stern, M., Mahtani, R., Wentlandt, K. and Isenberg, S.R. (2021). Examining the course of transitions from hospital to home-based palliative care: A mixed methods study. Palliative Medicine, 35(8), pp.1590–1601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163211023682.
Scheelbeek, P.F.D., Hamza, Y.A., Schellenberg, J. and Hill, Z. (2020). Improving the use of focus group discussions in low income settings. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01168-8.
Scope, A., Bhadhuri, A. and Pennington, B. (2022). Systematic Review of Cost-Utility Analyses That Have Included Carer and Family Member Health-Related Quality of Life. Value in Health, 2(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2022.02.008.
Sharifi, S., Islam, M.M., Sharifi, H., Islam, R., Huq, T.N., Nilsson, P.H., Mollnes, T.E., Tran, K.D., Patzer, C., Dohlman, C.H., Patra, H.K., Paschalis, E.I., Gonzalez?Andrades, M. and Chodosh, J. (2021). Electron Beam Sterilization of Poly(Methyl Methacrylate)—Physicochemical and Biological Aspects. Macromolecular Bioscience, 21(4), p.2000379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202000379.
Sinclair, S., Kondejewski, J., Jaggi, P., Roze des Ordons, A.L., Kassam, A., Hayden, K.A., Harris, D. and Hack, T.F. (2021). What works for whom in compassion training programs offered to practicing healthcare providers: a realist review. BMC Medical Education, [online] 21(1), p.455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02863-w.
Surmiak, A. (2019). Should we maintain or break confidentiality? The choices made by social researchers in the context of law violation and harm. Journal of Academic Ethics, [online] 18(7), pp.229–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09336-2.
Young, S. and Guo, K.L. (2020). Cultural Diversity Training: The Necessity of Cultural Competence for Health Care Providers and in Nursing Practice. The Health Care Manager, 39(2), pp.100–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/hcm.0000000000000294.
Zhang, W., Eike, D., Pasquero, L., Mahieu, A., Staderini, N., Blanchet, K. and Hossain, M. (2023). Mandatory reporting of sexual and gender-based violence in humanitarian settings: a qualitative analysis of international guidelines for humanitarian practitioners and scoping review of existing evidence. Global Journal of Medicine & Public Health, [online] 13(7). Available at: https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/49486/ [Accessed 16 Jan. 2024].
