Setting out on a nuanced exploration of financial version forecasting, this task capriciously dissects financial intricacies and the use of rigorous modelling strategies. Rooted in assumptions that lay the basis for subsequent analyses, this try encompasses three important sides: Financial Statement Analysis of Tesco, Modeling the Yield Curve, and Portfolio Optimization.
In the primary vicinity makes sense of Tesco's financial scene, diving into the Income Statement, Balance Sheet, and Cash Flow components. Key ratios, which include the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), edify the employer's monetary prosperity. Sensitivity analysis conveys a sturdy perspective, assessing the resilience of forecasting fashions to variable facts resources. Perceiving as a long way as possible in monetary forecasting, a vital factor of convergence is given the motivation to have a questionable outlook on expected goals.
Grab The Best Academic Assistance In Just One Click
The Change to Modeling the Yield Curve, a disturbing Yield to Maturity (YTM) evaluation spreads out. Utilizing a third-demand polynomial example, the YTM's bearing is inspected, coordinating subsequent reviews and bond-assessing computations. At the same time, Portfolio Optimization investigates monthly returns, covariance systems, and successful backwoods, both with and without a risk-unfastened asset.
This interdisciplinary economic odyssey wraps up with a fundamental evaluation, typifying characteristics, weaknesses, and streets for refinement. As the financial tale spreads out, the subsequent sections wind around collectively a weaving of facts, coordinating the pursuer through a large exploration of Tesco's economic scene.
Assumptions
In the project of economic analysis of Tesco Plc, multiple important assumptions form the trajectory of our modelling endeavors. Firstly, it's far assumed that the amassed monetary statistics, drawn from Tesco's annual reports and dependable online resources, are correct and reflective of the company's proper financial status (Dixon, 2020). Moreover, to determine fashions, its miles assumed that irrefutable economic examples will offer an affordable delegate for future execution, seeing the feature weaknesses within the consistently developing business scene.
The Financial Statement Analysis assumed that the given records units to earnings statements, balance sheets, and cash drift statements gift an expansive and accurate portrayal of Tesco's monetary activities. The assumption contacts the unflinching nature of legitimate examples, outlining the justification for forward-looking projections.
In the observations of Modeling the Yield Curve, it's miles assumed that the statistics open on Material concerning A-assessed protections given through US associations, besides people with very brief turn of events, is done and delegated (Araci, 2019). The notion is critical for the accuracy of the 1/3-call for polynomial instances and coming approximately opinions.
In the Portfolio Optimization, it is assumed that the modified close charges for the seven documents tending to the G7 countries are dependable and that the cash hazard is faultlessly upheld, taking into account a drew-in analysis of substantial worth go back data without the ensnarement of transformation scale fluctuations.
These assumptions generally assist the decency and authenticity of the accompanying exams, giving production to our examination of Tesco's economic intricacies.
Financial Statement Analysis of Tesco
Capex assessment
Figure 1: Analysis of Capex according to assumptions
In the above Capex analysis from 2024 to 2033, Tesco plc adopts a meticulous forecasting strategy for capital expenditures (Capex). Starting with the 2023 Capex derived from the last historical value, set at $1,422,000, the subsequent years witness a deliberate and declining growth trajectory. The calculated Capex for each year is determined using the formula: ( {Capex for Year} = {Capex for Previous Year} \times (1 + {Growth Rate})).
In the key assumptions coordinating this analysis incorporate a starting Capex of $1,422,000 for 2023, considering the last historical value. Over the 10 years, growth rates gradually declined from 5% to 2%, reflecting a nuanced change in Tesco's improvement strategy. This calculated system yields forecasted Capex figures, going from $1,493,000 in 2025 to $1,911,000 in 2033 (Awaysheh, 2020). The declining growth rates infer a careful financial strategy, agreeing with Tesco's strategic assumption for creating business area components. Through these assumptions, the analysis gives a forward-looking perspective on Tesco's capital hypothesis, adding to a comprehensive financial forecast.
Income Statement Analysis and Forecasting Model
Figure 2: Analysis of income statement
In the observation of the income statement analysis discloses Tesco plc's financial performance over the past four fiscal years, highlighting key metrics like total revenue, cost of revenue, gross profit, and operating income. Unmistakably, total revenue showed a consistent upward trend, reaching $65,762,000 in 2023. In any case, the cost of revenue proportionally increased, affecting the gross profit. Operating income experienced fluctuations, demonstrating a nuanced operational landscape.
The general addition attributable to ordinary investors changed, from $745,000 in 2023 to $6,143,000 in 2021, with looking at assortments in earnings per share (EPS). The analysis dives into normalized income, considering changes for unusual things, giving a more precise impression of Tesco's middle financial performance. EBITDA and EBIT are examined, reflecting Tesco's operational income and greater financial prosperity (Baloch, 2021). Moreover, the cost effects of weird things are considered, offering pieces of information into the impact of striking events on Tesco's appraisal position. By and large, the analysis gives an organized blueprint of Tesco's income statement, unravelling the intricacies of its financial performance.
Figure 3: Analysis of income statement forecast according to assumptions
The forecasted income statement lines up with critically made assumptions, giving a forward-looking glimpse into Tesco's financial landscape. Projected total revenue exhibits a consistent ascent, starting at $68,050,600 in 2024 and escalating with a 1% annual increase, coming to $82,714,880 in 2028. Assumptions direct an improvement bearing that mirrors both evident examples and consistent development.
Cost of revenue, set at 95% of revenue, maintains a consistent proportion, influencing the gross profit. Operating expenses are created by 5% annually, reflecting a strategic game plan with revenue expansion (Bukhari, 2020). The net non-operating revenue cost, obtained from obvious paces of revenue, shows a proportional lessening as per revenue improvement.
Pretax income and net income projections show a discerning model, coordinated by expected charge rates and net revenue expenses reflecting unquestionable norms. Normalized income, computing in changes for a more exact depiction, reflects a nuanced financial perspective.
These assumptions with everything taken into account specialty a check that mirrors Tesco's evident show while introducing continuous changes, offering a fair and reasonable projection of its future income statement.
The above figure shows the balance sheet analysis which gives a comprehensive viewpoint on Tesco plc's financial position over the past four monetary years. Total assets, starting at $46,132,000 in 2023, show a fluctuating trend, reflecting dynamic changes in current and non-current assets. Current assets, including cash, short-term investments, and inventory, show fluctuating degrees, affecting working capital.
Non-current assets, totaling $33,407,000 in 2023, mirror Tesco's long investments and practical belongings. Total liabilities, net minority interest, and equity display the creating financial development. Exceptionally, common stock equity, capital lease obligations, and net tangible assets add to Tesco's overall equity and capitalization (Dang, 2020). Working capital differences, tended to by awful figures, show shifts in short-term liquidity.
Invested capital, tangible book value, and total debt give nuanced pieces of information about Tesco's capital plan and financial impact. The analysis closes with share-related estimations, underlining the amount of common and storehouse shares, portraying Tesco's equity dynamics. By and large, the balance sheet analysis unravels the intricacies of Tesco's financial standing, offering a comprehensive perspective on its assets, liabilities, and equity.
Figure 5: Analysis of Balance Sheet forecast according to assumptions
The forecasted balance sheet lines up with cautious doubts, offering an arranged investigation of Tesco plc's financial scene. Total assets show a reliable augmentation, from $48,597,280 in 2024 to $59,070,298 in 2028, driven by a 5% yearly improvement rate. Current assets, including cash, inventory, and other current assets, show relative expansions, reflecting the normal turn of events and legitimate extents to pay.
Non-current assets show a near course, showing a fundamental plan with the association's improvement plans (Ichsan, 2021). Total liabilities, totaling $43,390,017 in 2028, reflect a balanced development coupled with total assets. Equity estimations, including common stock equity, capital lease obligations, and net tangible assets, give pieces of information into Tesco's capital plan.
Working capital, invested capital, and total debt outline the creating financial dynamics. The assumptions of a 5% yearly improvement rate, evident extents, and irrelevant changes in shares are wonderful all in all specialty a balanced and pragmatic projection of Tesco's future balance sheet, embodying both turns of events and strength.
Cash Flow Analysis and Forecasting Model
Figure 6: Analysis of Cash flow
The cash flow analysis gives a positive comprehension of Tesco plc's financial dynamics, unravelling the inflows and outflows across operating, investing, and financing activities. Operating cash flow, clever of the association's middle business undertakings, shows a positive trend over the past four monetary years, completing $4,209,000 in 2023. This upward heading features a strong useful show.
Investing cash flow uncovers essential decisions in capital purposes and investments. The issuance of debt and its repayment, close by capital stock activities, explains Tesco's financial use and capital development changes. The repurchase of capital stock shows share buyback drives. The end cash position, starting at $1,897,000 in 2023 and besting at $3,408,000 in 2020, means the association's liquidity and financial prosperity.
Despite instabilities, free cash flow from operating cash flow less capital purposes, stayed positive for numerous years, reflecting Tesco's capacity for internal financing and potential for theory or debt decline (Kirikkaleli, 2021). This comprehensive analysis offers a nuanced perception of Tesco's cash flow dynamics, basic for assessing its financial legitimacy and fundamental free heading.
Figure 7: Analysis of Cash flow forecast according to assumptions
The forecasted cash flow analysis for Tesco plc lines up with strategic assumptions, giving a forward-looking perspective into the company's financial liquidity and investment decisions. Anticipated operating cash flows, growing at a steady 5%, demonstrate an upward trajectory, coming to $5,369,000 in 2028. This positive example reflects a typical enthusiastic useful display.
Investing cash flows, including capital purposes and other investment activities, demonstrate an organized circulation of resources towards advancement and improvement. The decided issuance and repayment of debt, close by capital stock repurchase and other financing activities, reflect the company's financing and capital development methods. The end cash position, starting at $2,202,000 in 2024 and extending to $2,677,000 in 2028, emphasizes Tesco's financial adaptability.
Free cash flow, obtained from operating cash flow short capital utilizations, remains dependably certain, showing Tesco's actual limit concerning inside financing and financial versatility (Kliestik, 2020). For the most part, the forecasted cash flow analysis gives huge pieces of information about Tesco's projected financial prosperity and strategic financial decisions.
Ratio Analysis and Forecasting Model
Figure 8: Analysis of Ratio & Forecasted ratio according to Assumptions
The analysis of financial ratios, near the forecasted ratios considering strategic assumptions, gives an exhaustive evaluation of Tesco plc's financial show and chance profile.
Profitability Ratios: Gross profit, operating profit, and net income show robustness in the true data and are forecasted to remain at 6.20%, reflecting Tesco's ability to stay aware of profitability.
Return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE) demonstrate dependable valid execution, with forecasted values at 3.20% for both, affirming Tesco's efficiency in utilizing assets to make a benefit (Kou, 2019).
Asset Utilization Ratios: Asset turnover, stayed aware of at 1.4, demonstrates a congruity between pay improvement and asset the board, underlining Tesco's effective utilization of assets.
Liquidity Ratios: The current extent, expected to remain at 3.1, signals areas of strength for a liquidity position, ensuring Tesco's ability to cover fast responsibilities.
Leverage Ratios: Leverage ratios, including debt/equity and debt/assets, are forecasted to remain at 2.8 and 0.7, independently, reflecting a steady and moderate capital plan.
Assumptions, for instance, staying aware of profitability ratios, unsurprising asset turnover, and moderate leverage ratios line up with Tesco's irrefutable show, offering a reasonable and grounded justification behind gauging (Le, 2020). This analysis helps accomplices in sorting out Tesco's financial prosperity, practical viability, and chance organization systems.
Sensitivity Analysis
Figure 9: Sensitivity Analysis
The sensitivity analysis assesses the impact of assortments in key metrics on Tesco's financial performance, giving pieces of information into the company's vulnerability and resilience to changes.
Revenue Changes: A 10% decline in revenue to $59.2 million generally reduces net advantage and operating compensation, achieving a famous lessening in an overall increase to - $4.15 million. Then again, a 10% extension in revenue helps profitability, with net increase rising to $5.72 million.
Costs and Expenses: A 10% augmentation in costs unfavourably impacts net advantage and operating compensation, provoking a decline in total pay (Mishra, 2020). Then again, a 10% reduction in expenses further develops profitability, showing the sensitivity of Tesco's benefit to cost organization.
Overall Impact: The base case reflects a fiery financial position, yet the sensitivity analysis includes the meaning of revenue security and the successful cost to the board. Tesco's ability to conform to changing circumstances is clear, highlighting the necessity for strategic agility in investigating anticipated troubles and opportunities.
Limitations of Financial Statement Forecasting Model
The financial statement forecasting model, while a huge gadget, isn't without obstacles. Its precision depends upon the exactness of assumptions and projections, making it fragile to unforeseen market changes. Outside factors, for instance, financial changes and industry components can challenge the model's farsighted limits. Moreover, it anticipates an anticipated future business environment, overlooking surprising events (Nazah, 2022). In addition, reliance on unquestionable data may not discover emerging examples or aggravations. Clients should perceive these hindrances and exercise alert, seeing that forecasting naturally incorporates weaknesses and uncontrollable factors.
Modeling the Yield Curve
The third-order polynomial trend for the YTM
Figure 10: Third-order polynomial of YTM
The third-order polynomial regression reveals a complex relationship in the Yield-to-Maturity (YTM) graph. It gets assortments and changes in YTM, suggesting nonlinear impacts. Apexes and boxes in the twist demonstrate conceivable central focuses for investors. The polynomial fit thinks about a more nuanced cognizance of YTM leading past direct examples. Anyway, unravelling the graph requires alert, as high-order polynomials could introduce noise and overfitting (Ozbayoglu, 2020). Investors should carefully separate fundamental centres, considering factors impacting yields and market components to make informed investment decisions. Additionally, irregularities or absurd characteristics could impact the constancy of the polynomial fit [Referred to Appendix 1].
Estimation of the YTM
Figure 10: Yield carve of YTM
The Yield Curve of Yield to Maturity graph offers pieces of information into the relationship between the YTM and the maturity time span. The curve's shape demonstrates the term development of financing costs. A distinctly skewed curve recommends better returns for longer turns of events, reflecting an ordinary yield curve (Sezer, 2020). Then again, a changed curve proposes higher transient yields, hailing conceivable financial concerns. Fluctuations in the curve reveal market assumptions and investor sentiments. Analyzing this curve helps investors in expecting future credit cost improvements, going with strategic investment decisions considering winning financial conditions and yield assumptions across different maturity periods.
Fair Price of the Bond
Figure 11: Chart of Fair Price
The Fair Price chart reflects variations in the fair market value over time. It exhibits fluctuations in asset valuation, showing potential market trends. Times of upward spikes or declines propose shifts in investor sentiment or changes in secret factors impacting fair assessing. The chart's overall trajectory gives encounters into the asset's clear worth, helping investors in the strategic route. Seeing the apexes and box considers ID of anticipated exchanging open entryways perspective on changing market components. Looking at this graph assists with sorting out the historical setting of fair assessing, working with more instructed investment philosophies and danger evaluations.
Number of Bonds Required to Issue
Figure 12: Chart of numbers of bonds that required to be issued
In the Figure 12 provides a practical illustration of determining the number of bonds expected to raise a specified amount, employing the formula: Number of bonds = Amount to be raised/Offering price per bond. Including a $5 million bond issuance as an example, if the face value per bond is $1,000 and the offering price is $950 (issued at a discount), the calculation yields 5,263 bonds needed to generate the desired $5 million (Werner, 2022 ). This figure demonstrates the close relationship between the offering terms and the amount of bonds, offering clarity for financial arrangement and dynamics in bond issuances.
Portfolio Optimization
Monthly Simple Return
Figure 13: Chart of Monthly Simple return of G7 nations
The above table presents monthly simple returns for G7 nations. Notable trends recollect the positive returns for December 2019, particularly for Japan (4.58%) and Italy (- 6.51%). September 2019 saw tremendous rots in all cases, notably in the US (- 8.52%) and Italy (- 11.98%). Positive returns in July 2019 are seen, with Italy showing a notable 12.78% development. Overall, the data reveals the precariousness and different performance of G7 nations, highlighting the impact of overall events and money-related conditions on financial markets. It provides significant pieces of information for investors and policymakers monitoring overall financial components.
Covariance Matrix
Figure 14: Chart of Covariance Matrix of G7 nations
The covariance matrix quantifies the relationships between different financial variables for G7 nations. A higher covariance indicates stronger linear relationships, while lower values suggest weaker associations. In this matrix, positive covariances highlight simultaneous increases or decreases between the corresponding pairs of countries, reflecting potential common economic trends. Conversely, negative covariances suggest novel turns of events. Understanding these covariances is basic for the risk the chiefs in portfolios, as it upholds reviewing how assets move concerning each other. Expanding procedures much of the time impact covariance pieces of information to improve portfolios and reduce risk by uniting assets with lower or negatively related returns.
Efficient Set
Risk-free Rate
Figure 15: Chart of Risk-Free Equity assets of G7 nations
The graph illustrates the monthly returns of Risk-Free Equity assets for G7 nations, represented by key market indices. Positive values denote returns, while negative ones signify losses. Analyzing trends across nations can give encounters into global economic dynamics. For instance, synchronized vertical improvements could show a positive global market assessment, while different models suggest assortments in economic conditions (Keasey, 2019). The consistency or unusualness in returns is critical for financial sponsors in assessing risk and seeking informed decisions. Noticing these Risk-Free Equity returns can uphold seeing greater market trends, adding to all the more impressive endeavour philosophies and risk management.
Non-risk Free Rate
Figure 16: Chart of Non-Risk-Free Equity assets of G7 nations
The graph depicts monthly returns of Non-Risk-Free Equity assets for G7 nations, utilizing various equity indices. Negative values indicate losses, while positive ones denote returns. Seeing the trends across countries gives huge pieces of information into global equity market dynamics. Enormous assortments in returns highlight the varying economic conditions and execution of these nations. Sudden spikes or drops, especially in individual markets, may indicate novel regional variables influencing adventure results. Noticing these Non-Risk-Free Equity returns is basic for financial supporters to see the value in market changes, study risk, and devise a lot of taught hypothesis frameworks. The graph fills in as a key gadget for really looking at the introduction of equity assets across G7 nations [Referred to Appendix 2].
Improvement of Portfolio Optimization
Further developing portfolio optimization incorporates refining the asset allocation strategy to achieve better risk-adjusted returns. By leveraging advanced quantitative techniques, investors can incorporate factors like covariance metrics and historical returns. Compromise of computer-based intelligence computations and electronic thinking guides in expecting asset lead even more exactly. Besides, considering Non-Risk-Free Equity assets near Risk-Free ones gives an exhaustive view, getting different market conditions. This advanced system ensures that the portfolio is dynamically adjusted considering consistent market data, chipping away at its solidarity against unconventionality. The unending evaluation of emerging trends and risk factors empowers investors with a good, flexible portfolio optimization framework, upgrading execution across various market circumstances.
Critical Analysis
The critical analysis analyzes the portfolio optimization framework, highlighting its strengths and potential drawbacks. While the integration of covariance metrics and historical returns redesigns risk management, reliance on past data acknowledges future market lead mirrors historical models. The thought of artificial intelligence presents a multifaceted design, requiring full blessing to ensure perceptive accuracy (Corporatefinanceinstitute.com,2023). The philosophy's adaptability to propelling market dynamics is admirable; in any case, overreliance on quantitative models could disregard abstract market shifts. Likewise, the Non-Risk-Free Equity assets' unsteadiness raises stresses over potential drawbacks. A reasonable congruity between quantitative precision and emotional encounters is critical for a broad, flexible portfolio optimization strategy.
Summary and Discussion
The summary and discussion exemplify the revelations, underlining the portfolio optimization's nuanced reasonability. By leveraging covariance metrics and historical returns, the model investigates risk adeptly, buttressed by simulated intelligence adaptability. In any case, concerns arise over historical data consistency and the raised capriciousness of Non-Risk-Free Equity assets. Discovering some sort of amicability between quantitative exactness and abstract market encounters emerges as crucial. The report features the necessity for constant endorsement and refinement, maintaining a careful yet creative system. The model's generosity in different market conditions requires advancing assessment, ensuring its plan with dynamic financial scenes.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the report edifies the means and challenges in portfolio optimization. The mix of quantitative systems and AI uncovers a promising course, uplifting risk-careful hypothesis decisions. Disregarding triumphs, ready successes due to the diserse idea of financial markets. The favourable collaboration of trial data and crucial intuition remaining parts head for upheld accomplishment. Perceiving the creating scene, the report features the exceptional thought of optimization models, requiring endless change and endorsement. It's a journey of refinement, where circumspection and improvement lace shape adaptable portfolios in the reliably moving progressions of the global financial field.
References
Book
Dixon, M. F., Halperin, I., & Bilokon, P. (2020). Machine learning in finance (Vol. 1170). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer International Publishing. Available at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-41068-1.pdf [Accessed on: 1.12.2023]
Journals
Araci, D. (2019). Finbert: Financial sentiment analysis with pre-trained language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10063.Retrieve From: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.10063 [Retrieve on: 1.12.2023]
Awaysheh, A., Heron, R. A., Perry, T., & Wilson, J. I. (2020). On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 41(6), 965-987.Retrieve From: https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/27648/Awaysheh2020On-the-relation-AAM.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Retrieve on: 1.12.2023]
Baloch, M. A., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F. V., & Khan, D. (2021). Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: does globalization matter?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 176-184.Retrieve From: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bse.2615 Retrieve on: 1.12.2023]
Bukhari, A. H., Raja, M. A. Z., Sulaiman, M., Islam, S., Shoaib, M., & Kumam, P. (2020). Fractional neuro-sequential ARFIMA-LSTM for financial market forecasting. Ieee Access, 8, 71326-71338.Retrieve From: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/6287639/8948470/09057460.pdf [Retrieve on: : 1.12.2023]
Dang, H. T., Phan, D. T., Nguyen, H. T., & Hoang, L. H. T. (2020). Factors affecting financial risk: evidence from listed enterprises in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 11-18.Retrieve From: https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO202026061031181.pdf Retrieve on: 1.12.2023]
Ichsan, R., Suparmin, S., Yusuf, M., Ismal, R., & Sitompul, S. (2021). Determinant of Sharia Bank's Financial Performance during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(1), 298-309.Retrieve From: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f022/fdbbbd29795e57846eae6d1545a92a2052b4.pdf Retrieve on: 1.12.2023]
Kirikkaleli, D., & Adebayo, T. S. (2021). Do renewable energy consumption and financial development matter for environmental sustainability? New global evidence. Sustainable Development, 29(4), 583-594.Retrieve From: https://www.academia.edu/download/65436670/Sustainable_development_3.pdf Retrieve on: 1.12.2023]
Kliestik, T., Valaskova, K., Lazaroiu, G., Kovacova, M., & Vrbka, J. (2020). Remaining financially healthy and competitive: The role of financial predictors. Journal of Competitiveness, (1).Retrieve From: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5400/0fcd811eb1a5259be85f9ce9d03d9c24a15c.pdf [Retrieve on: 1.12.2023]
Kou, G., Chao, X., Peng, Y., Alsaadi, F. E., & Herrera Viedma, E. (2019). Machine learning methods for systemic risk analysis in financial sectors.Retrieve From: https://digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/handle/10481/59467/8740-Article%20Text-23255-4-10-20190913.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y[Retrieve on: 1.12.2023]
Le, H. P., & Ozturk, I. (2020). The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO 2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 22680-22697.Retrieve From: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hoang-Phong-Le/publication/340847313_The_impacts_of_globalization_financial_development_government_expenditures_and_institutional_quality_on_CO2_emissions_in_the_presence_of_environmental_Kuznets_curve/links/5ea1a710458515ec3a00551e/The-impacts-of-globalization-financial-development-government-expenditures-and-institutional-quality-on-CO2-emissions-in-the-presence-of-environmental-Kuznets-curve.pdf [Retrieve on: 1.12.2023]
Mishra, A. K., Rath, B. N., & Dash, A. K. (2020). Does the Indian financial market nosedive because of the COVID-19 outbreak, in comparison to after demonetisation and the GST?. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(10), 2162-2180.Retrieve From: https://www.academia.edu/download/83366231/1540496X.2020.pdf [Retrieve on:1.12.2023]
Nazah, K., Ningsih, A. W., Irwansyah, R., Pakpahan, D. R., & Nabella, S. D. (2022). The Role of UKT Scholarships in Moderating Student Financial Attitudes and Financial Literacy on Finance Management Behavior. Jurnal Mantik, 6(2), 2205-2212.Retrieve From: http://www.iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/article/download/2781/2191[Retrieve on: 1.12.2023]
Ozbayoglu, A. M., Gudelek, M. U., & Sezer, O. B. (2020). Deep learning for financial applications: A survey. Applied Soft Computing, 93, 106384.Retrieve From: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494620303240 [Retrieve on: 1.12.2023]
Sezer, O. B., Gudelek, M. U., & Ozbayoglu, A. M. (2020). Financial time series forecasting with deep learning: A systematic literature review: 2005–2019. Applied soft computing, 90, 106181.Retrieve From: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.13288 [Retrieve on: 1.12.2023]
Werner, S., Perez, D., Gudgeon, L., Klages-Mundt, A., Harz, D., & Knottenbelt, W. (2022, September). Sok: Decentralized finance (defi). In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (pp. 30-46).Retrieve From: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3558535.3559780 Retrieve on: 1.12.2023]
