The UK's leading assignment help company, Native Assignment Help, will help you get your academic journey on the right foot. We pride ourselves on being able to offer you all-encompassing support that meets your every need. Moreover, we know that we can deliver excellent results on each task, which is a source of joy for us. Try out our case study to get a taste of good work.
This essay will search the main concepts of entrepreneurial mindset, creativity, and innovation from the perspective of a case study. Company entrepreneurship is the procedure of encouraging new business projects or initiatives inside a well-known company. Innovation includes designing fresh products, procedures, or services that provide value to consumers. Creativity is the skill of producing novel and helpful ideas (Aburumman, 2020). This case study will help as a practical case to inspect how these ideas are unified and may be successfully implemented in actual-world set-ups to make progress and rivalry in businesses. The essay will analyze two diverse scenarios called vignettes and express how creativity and innovation could be used to solve issues in every situation.
The Entrepreneurial mindset
The entrepreneurial mindset is a set of beliefs, behaviours and attitudes vital for triumph in entrepreneurship (Kwilinski et al., 2019). It encompasses having a practical technique, an eagerness to take hazards, a concentration on problem-solving, and a sturdy sense of flexibility and determination.
Fixed mindset belongs to the trusts, which are intelligence, skills and talents that set traits that may not be developed.
A growth mindset belongs to the idea that these attributes could be better through learning and hard work.
By implementing a growth mindset, TUI Company remains ahead of the curve in a quickly changing business and makes fresh solutions for its consumers.
VIGNETTE 1: Application of structured techniques for idea generation
An exterior trainer can be ineffective in making creative solutions to difficult organizational issues due to several reasons.
These actions may require arrangement and obedience to solve difficult problems (Vadana et al., 2020). They can offer general knowledge and abilities, not tailored to particular organizational threats.
Secondly, one-time training cannot have a long-term effect on workers, and they could not have sufficient time to perform and incorporate the new abilities into their job procedures.
Moreover, workers could not perceive the significance of working out their work, conducting it in the absence of inspiration and interest.
Alternately, training in prepared problem-solving approaches such as brainstorming can be further effective in making innovative results to difficult organizational concerns. Brainstorming permits the invention of fresh ideas, encourages collaboration, and includes a prepared procedure that assures every idea is listened to and measured. It is a comprehensive procedure that permits the experience of every worker in any case of their job stage or practice. This technique is adapted to particular organizational difficulties and could be included in the organization’s culture and performances for enduring impact.
Though there can be problems in acquiring a prepared issue-solving style like brainstorming. One difficulty is reflection, where workers can be utilized to do stuff in a certain manner and find it difficult to crack from the model. One more challenge is a state of mind and insight, where workers can have a permanent mindset that thwarts their skills to think innovatively or cannot feel comfortable distributing their thoughts. To defeat these difficulties, TUI Group must boost a development mindset and help workers who display industrial attributes (Gali et al., 2020). The company must also offer a secure and supportive atmosphere for workers to allocate their ideas and analysis with fresh ways of issue-solving.
As an extremely complex company that has developed through the procurement of other organizations, TUI Group can face problems in making shared insights and culture. Nevertheless, the organization has announced many initiatives to help ethnicity change, involving flexible operations, open interaction, suitable dialogue formats, and general insight (Barsalou, 2017). TUI Group could use these actions to help enact a prepared problem-solving method, such as brainstorming and making a custom of innovation that operates the organization forward.
Brainstorming
Brainstorming is an innovative method to produce many thoughts in the short term. It encompasses an in-group coming cooperatively and freely giving their ideas on a certain topic without condemnation or judgment. Brainstorming aims to boost innovative thinking and design with creative solutions (Alsafadi et al., 2020). This approach may support the case study of TUI organization by making ideas for dealing with the difficulties faced by the Company.
Advantages of the Technique/benefits of the Company
Brainstorming is a dominant approach that could be helpful to the TUI organization in various ways. Several of the advantages are given below:
Making innovative ideas: Brainstorming permits an in-group to team their cooperative knowledge and conceive unique thoughts that cannot have been measured before.
Boosting collaboration promotes: Collaboration and encourages people to work jointly to accomplish a universal goal.
Encouraging output: Brainstorming classes that can support the TUI organization to gain time and enhance productivity by rapidly making solutions to challenges or recognizing fresh opportunities (Karami, 2021).
Improving interaction: Brainstorming encourages open interaction, which can build trust and generate a more optimistic work atmosphere.
Increasing decision-making: it can also assist the TUI company in generating further informed decisions by allowing for numerous perspectives and aspects.
Disadvantages/Challenges to be Overcome
One possible drawback of brainstorming is the likelihood of team thinking, where persons may be unwilling to say their thoughts or viewpoints for the terror of being judged or discarded by the team. This may affect the absence of variety in thoughts and potentially induce unacceptable solutions.
Another problem with ideation is that it could be time-consumption and amorphous, leading to an absence of concentration and complexity in choosing the most practical ideas.
To surmount these problems, TUI could apply strategies to boost open interaction and various ideas throughout brainstorming classes (Hameed, 2019). This can involve setting a clear plan for involvement and boosting equivalent contributions from every member. TUI could also set up a procedure for choosing and organizing thoughts to ensure the main committing solutions are tailed.
Attribute Analysis
Attribute scrutiny is a decision-making approach utilized by TUI Company to estimate a set of choices and recognize the most appropriate one dependent on a set of qualities or criteria (Schäfer, 2020). It includes collapsing an issue or decision into minor elements and analyzing all elements dependent on a lay of predetermined attributes.
In this framework of TUI organization, Attribute Analysis could be utilized to estimate several options connected to product expansion, marketing tactics, consumer experience, and working efficiency (Johann, 2022.). By employing this approach, TUI could create further informed decisions dependent on aim analysis and estimating every option's powers and weaknesses instead of predetermined standards.
Advantages
Better product expansion: Attribute Analysis supports TUI in recognizing the main attributes consumers are worth in travel packages, allowing the organization to build fresh products that improve and meet consumer requirements.
Competition: By recognizing different attributes valued by consumers, TUI could gain a competitive advantage over additional travel organizations (Vernon, 2016).
Cost savings: This analysis supports TUI's recognition attributes that consumers do not sign as extremely, allowing the organization to decrease prices by knocking out these factors from their tour packages (Laursen, 2019).
Increased marketing: TUI may employ the visions obtained from attribute scrutiny to make further targeted marketing initiatives that emphasize the most significant quality of their tour packages, bettering the usefulness of their marketing powers.
Enhanced consumer fulfilment: By designing travel packages that coordinate with the attributes consumers mainly value, TUI could enhance consumer satisfaction, increasing consumer reliability, and replicating business (?slim, 2016).
Disadvantages
Time-consumption: The procedure of illuminating and balancing attributes could be time-consumption, particularly if the TUI Company has many goods and services to scrutinize.
Subjectivity: The scrutiny might be an issue of the personal tendencies and views of the analyst, which could impact the accuracy and dependability of the outcomes (Lim, 2020).
Limited range: The procedure cannot report for every relevant aspect which impacts consumer preferences, for example, external aspects like economic circumstances, political shifts, and technological improvement.
Absence of innovation: Concentrating only on accessible attributes could limit the probability of advance and creativity in rising new goods or services.
Dependence on data: Attribute scrutiny can need a wide-ranging data set, which can be expensive and time-consuming, leading to a possible dependence on statistics and the qualitative factors of consumer preferences (Kanca et al., 2020).
VIGNETTE 2: Frameworks to promote creativity and innovation
One potential cause for the uselessness of earlier modernization initiatives at the TUI organization may be the absence of an organized approach that combines multiple approaches for idea creation and growth. Lacking a structured procedure in position, innovation creation may become disorderly and fail to produce touchable outcomes (Puccio et al., 2020). Moreover, a lack of clear innovation tactics and insights, and an absence of interaction and teamwork between diverse departments and groups, may also delay the victory of modernization initiatives.
To address these concerns, TUI may benefit from acquiring a further organized technique for innovation, for instance, the Osborn Parnes Framework CPS and Design Thinking.
The Osborn Parnes Framework CPS is a planned procedure for innovative problem-solving that includes many stages involving problem recognition, idea production, selection, preparation, and implementation. This technique highlights the significance of different and intersecting thinking (Guner, 2020). By utilizing this framework, the Company may ensure that innovation intentions are assisted in a planned and systematic way that permits the looking at a wide range of possible solutions while still handling a clear concentration on mainly auspicious options.
Design Thinking is one more approach that may be useful for TUI Company. It is a people-oriented technique for problem-solving which includes considering the requirements and viewpoints of shareholders and customers, creativity, prototyping, and experimenting. By placing the requirements of consumers and shareholders in the middle of the innovation procedure, it can also support TUI in making solutions that are further suitable and impactful (Goswami, 2017).
Design thinking
Design Thinking is an analytical technique that concentrates on humanistic solutions. It encompasses identifying with users, describing the difficulty, imagining solutions, sampling, and testing (Garg et al., 2018.). Several benefits of Design Thinking are discussed below:
Client-oriented approach: Design Thinking sets clients in the middle of the issue-solving procedure. By comprehending users and considering their requirements, designers could build solutions that meet their needs.
Creativity: This procedure boosts creativity and new thinking. It permits designers to consider the outer box and arise with different solutions that cannot be measured in a customary problem-solving technique.
Partnership-Design:Thinking includes collaboration among designers, clients, and shareholders (Kittel et al., 2021). This boosts communication and collaboration, conducting a more effective problem-solving procedure.
Iterative procedure: This process is monotonous, permitting designers to process their solutions by repeated trial and feedback. Although, this induces improved solutions, which are further liable to succeed.
Adaptability: Design thinking could be implemented to various industry issues (Biswas, 2016). However, it is not restricted to every field, creating an adaptable problem-solving method.
The usefulness of design thinking
Design Thinking is an issue-solving technique that highlights understanding the customer’s requirements, exploring other solutions, and guiding them to make creative solutions. It has various benefits which may support the TUI Company:
Client-oriented Approach: Design Thinking is a consumer-oriented approach concentrating on consumer's requirements and desires (Wright, 2023). This approach may support TUI's improved comprehension of its consumers, make further customer-centric solutions, and improve the consumer experience.
Boosts Innovation: Design thinking boosts innovation through challenging presumptions, exploring fresh ideas, and trialling diverse solutions. This technique can support TUI in expanding further innovative items, services, and trade models which distinguish the organization from competitors.
Empowers multifunctional teams: It is a cooperative approach that boosts multifunctional teams to work jointly to solve difficult problems. This method can support TUI to conk out silos, promote collaboration, and fill in varied perspectives and abilities to develop further useful solutions.
Quicker Time-to-Market: This thinking is repetitive. The prototyping method could help TUI experiment and authorize ideas rapidly and efficiently, decreasing the time-to-market for fresh goods and services (Mishra, 2019).
Minimize Risk: This thinking is user-oriented. A trial approach may support TUI to ease the Risk of initiating new gods and services through experiments and authenticating ideas with customers before contributing major resources.
Constraints to be overcome
As Design Thinking provides a prepared method for problem-solving, here are some necessities that must be reflected through TUI when implementing this model (Lages et al., 2020). It involves:
Time consumption: Design thinking is a slow procedure, including numerous levels of research, creativity, prototyping, and experimenting. TUI can want to assign major time and capital to assure that the procedure is inclusive successfully.
Needs experienced practitioners: Design thinking needs skilled specialists who are skilled in research, creativity, and prototyping (Chatterjee, 2016). The Company can want to spend on training or recruiting experienced professionals to successfully implement this model.
Limited range: Design Thinking cannot be appropriate for every challenge or circumstance. It is helpful when the difficulty is complex, unclear, and needs a user-oriented approach. TUI can need to evaluate the appropriateness of the model to the difficulty they are searching to solve.
An encouraging organizational culture: Needs a helpful one that boosts innovation, risk-taking, and experimentation (Azevedo et al., 2016). The Company can require promoting a culture that ideals innovation and assists in employing this model.
Recommendations
Based on the live case study, TUI may take several steps to make sure that innovation and ideation remain a priority. Here are some recommendations:
Establish training programs and studios that place a focus on the development of skills including plan design, critical thinking, and problem-solving.
To encourage innovation and creativity, use structured tactics like hackathons, design thinking, and ideation.
Create a centre for innovation where employees may work together on creative ideas and initiatives.
Promote communication and knowledge sharing among cross-functional teams.
Recognize and honor staff members who volunteer their time to the company's activities to foster creativity and innovation.
Promote a culture of continuing learning and growth by fostering a friendly workplace where staff members feel free to voice their ideas and opinions (Adams, 2016).
Promote staff acceptance of innovation and change by organizing frequent feedback sessions.
Promote a growth mindset among workers by giving them chances for education and advancement.
Underline the significance of innovation and creativity as the company's guiding principles.
Collaborate with industry leaders and outside specialists to create original ideas and viewpoints.
Ace your business assignment help with Native Assignment Help! Our expert team ensures precision and clarity in every project, delivering insightful analyses and strategic solutions. Don't let complex business theories hold you back; trust us for top-tier assignments that elevate your academic performance.
Conclusion
This report concludes that the purpose of techniques for thought generation and increasing innovation and ideation through an entrepreneurial mindset in companies may induce major benefits. These approaches, for instance, brainstorming, and design thinking, promote collaboration and innovation, resulting in a further creative and competitive company. The report also emphasizes an entrepreneurial mindset, highlighting risk-taking and flexibility, which may support companies to remain agile and approachable to shifting market situations. However, it is necessary to make a supportive custom that values testing and innovation and to include leadership that boosts and empowers workers to take a hazard and follow new ideas to make the Company more dynamic and creative.
References
Aburumman, A.H., 2020. The concept of global governance in tourism franchises: a case study of TUI group. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2), p.1321.
Adams, C. and Nash, J., (2016). Exploring design thinking practices in evaluation. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 12(26), 12–17.
Alsafadi, Y., Aljawarneh, N., Ça?lar, D., Bayram, P. and Zoubi, K., 2020. The mediating impact of entrepreneurs among administrative entrepreneurship, imitative entrepreneurship and acquisitive entrepreneurship on creativity. Management Science Letters, 10(15), pp.3571-3576.
Azevedo, I., Morais, M.D.F., Martins, F. and Cramond, B., 2016. The future problem-solving program international (FPSPI): A Challenge for creative citizens. Kie Conference Publishings.
Barsalou, L.W., (2017). Define design thinking. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(2), 102–105.
Biswas, P., Pramanik, S. and Giri, B.C., 2016. Aggregation of triangular fuzzy neutrosophic set information and its application to multi-attribute decision making. Neutrosophic sets and systems, 12, pp.20-40.
Chatterjee, S., (2016, March). A synthesis of structural creative problem-solving from the OR/MS methodology perspective. In 2016 International Conference on Computational Techniques in Information and Communication Technologies (ICCTICT) (pp. 398–403). IEEE.
Gali, N., Niemand, T., Shaw, E., Hughes, M., Kraus, S. & Brem, A. (2020). Social entrepreneurship orientation and company success: The mediating role of social performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, p.120230.
Garg, H., Munir, M., Ullah, K., Mahmood, T. and Jan, N., 2018. Algorithm for T-spherical fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on improved interactive aggregation operators. Symmetry, 10(12), p.670.
Goswami, B., Jain, A. and Koner, B.C., (2017). Evaluation of brainstorming session as a teaching-learning tool among postgraduate medical biochemistry students. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 7(Suppl 1), p.S15.
Guner, S. and Ilker, K.O.S.E., 2020. A new approach proposes TRIZ as a creative problem-solving technique in health services. Research Journal of Business and Management, 7(2), pp.67-79.
Hameed, I. & Irfan, Z. (2019). Entrepreneurship education: a review of challenges, characteristics and opportunities. Entrepreneurship Education, 2, pp.135–148.
?slim, Ö.F. and Karata?, S., 2016. Using the Scamper technique in an ICT course to enhance creative problem-solving skills: An experimental study.
Johann, M., (2022). CSR Strategy in Tourism during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 14(7), 3773.
Kanca, I.N., Ginaya, G., Astuti, S. and Nyoman, N., 2020. The effectiveness of the problem-solving method on learning outcomes of the English course for room division operation during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(1), pp.12-22.
Karami, M. and Read, S., 2021. Co-creative entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(4), p.106125.
Kittel, A., Cunningham, I., Larkin, P., Hawkey, M. & Rix-Lievre, G. (2021). Decision-making training in sporting officials: Past, present and future. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 56, p.102003.
Kwilinski, A., Dalevska, N., Kravchenko, S., Hroznyi, I. and Kovalenko, O., 2019. Formation of the entrepreneurship model of e-business in the context of introducing information and communication technologies. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22, pp.1-7.
Lages, L.F., Ricard, A., Hemonnet?Goujot, A. and Guerin, A.M., 2020. Frameworks for innovation, collaboration, and change: Value creation wheel, design thinking, creative problem?solving, and lean. Strategic Change, 29(2), pp.195-213.
Laursen, L.N. and Haase, L.M., 2019. The shortcomings of design thinking when compared to designerly thinking. The Design Journal, 22(6), pp.813-832.
Lim, C. & Han, H. (2020). Development of instructional design strategies for integrating an online support system for creative problem-solving into a University course. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21, pp.539–552.
Linton, G. and Klinton, M., 2019. University entrepreneurship education: a design thinking approach to learning. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), pp.1-11.
Merrotsy, P., (2017). Pedagogy for creative problem-solving. Taylor & Francis.
Interaction Design Foundation, Dam, R.F. and Siang, T.Y., 2021. What is design thinking, and why is it so popular?
Mishra, A.R. & Rani, P. (2019). Shapley divergence measures with the VIKOR method for multi-attribute decision-making problems. Neural Computing and Applications, 31, pp.1299–1316.
Puccio, G.J., Burnett, C., Acar, S., Yudess, J.A., Holinger, M. and Cabra, J.F., 2020. Creative problem-solving in small groups: The effects of creativity training on idea generation, solution creativity, and leadership effectiveness. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), pp.453-471.
Schäfer, J.C., (2020). The case of TUI: sailing into a bright future or sinking like Thomas Cook? (Doctoral dissertation).
Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F. and Hansen, E.G., 2016. Business models for sustainability: A co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(3), pp.264-289.
Vadana, I.I., Torkkeli, L., Kuivalainen, O. and Saarenketo, S., 2020. Digitalization of companies in international entrepreneurship and marketing. International Marketing Review, 37(3), pp.471-492.
Vernon, D., Hocking, I. and Tyler, T.C., (2016). An evidence-based review of creative problem-solving tools: A practitioner's resource. Human Resource Development Review, 15(2), 230–259.
Wright, B., (2023). Resilient decisions: Crisis-event decision making and the influence of post-event scrutiny.
Share this
Cite This Work
Go Through the Best and FREE Case Studies Written by Our Academic Experts!
