Strategic Analysis of Market Forces Transforming International Business Today
The UK's leading assignment help company, Native Assignment Help, will help you get your academic journey on the right foot. We pride ourselves on being able to offer you all-encompassing support that meets your every need. Moreover, we know that we can deliver excellent results on each task, which is a source of joy for us. Try out our case study UK to get a taste of good work.
Introduction
This paper aims to critically assess the major variables affecting and currently posing challenges to organizations operating in the global market in 2022–2023 and beyond (Bobro, 2018). The process of Globalization has been ongoing for centuries. However, in recent years, significant disruptions and distortions have impacted the world economy and presented difficulties for businesses attempting to compete on a global scale (Sindi & Roe, 2017). This essay will examine the various forces reshaping the world today, including Globalization's political, cultural, and economic aspects, and how they affect the competitiveness and efficiency of organizations doing business worldwide (Storper, 2016). The report will help better understand the current state of Globalization and its effects on organizations by looking at academic perspectives like those of Dicken and O'Sullivan and other pertinent literature (Li, Cousins, and Hornbuckle, 2023). Ultimately, this paper offers insights into organizations' difficulties and chances in negotiating the complex and quickly shifting global landscape (Pound Sterling Live, 2021.). Figure 1 shows that the IMF predicts slow growth for the eurozone in the next two years while global growth is projected to increase. However, uncertainties remain due to the potential impact of new COVID-19 strains on vaccine efficacy, as cited in Pound Sterling Live, 2021.
Figure 1: U.K. Economy to Outperform Both Eurozone and U.S. in 2022
Rationales for CW1
Logistics and supply chain management (SCM) have become increasingly important in facilitating the movement of goods across international borders due to Globalization, which has changed how businesses operate (Guan et al., 2023). By examining O'Sullivan and Dicken's perspectives, this assignment seeks to understand how Globalization has affected logistics and SCM (Puri et al., 2023).
According to O'Sullivan, Globalization has resulted in the development of global supply chains characterized by the dispersion of production processes among various nations (Sindi & Roe, 2017). He claims that this has brought about a fresh set of logistical and SCM challenges, including coordinating and managing intricate global networks of suppliers, distributors, and clients (Rampke, 2016). In order to achieve successful global logistics and SCM, O'Sullivan also emphasizes the need for infrastructure improvement and technical innovation (Kandil et al., 2020).
O'Sullivan and Dicken have roughly similar views on Globalization and SCM. However, Dicken focuses more on how it impacts the geography of production and how multinational companies (MNCs) affect international supply chains (Puri et al., 2023). Dicken asserts that MNCs have substantially impacted where manufacturing and distribution facilities are located and have advanced Globalization (Sindi & Roe, 2017). He argues that the dominance of MNCs has led to a concentration of power in the hands of a few very strong companies, who have tremendous influence over suppliers and distributors (Puri, Gandhi and Kumar, 2023).
The key factors are currently facing and influencing organizations operating in the global landscape of 2022/2023 and the future.
Organizations operating in the global environment of 2022–2023 and the future deal with various intricate and interconnected factors that affect their daily operations and strategic choices (Hayuth, 2017). This essay aims to critically assess the major variables affecting and posing challenges to organizations across the globe right now (Gartner, Inc., 2023).
First, technological innovation is one of the major factors affecting businesses operating on a global scale (Todd Alessandri, 2022). From automation and artificial intelligence to blockchain and the Internet of Things (IoT), the rapid pace of technological change is changing how businesses operate (Hamdani et al., p. 217). Increasing productivity and efficiency in operations, supply chains, and customer experience, these technologies help businesses compete more successfully globally (Todd Alessandri, 2022).
Second, it is becoming clearer how international instability and eccentricity affect global relationships (Vaubel & Willett, 2019). Worldwide inventory organizations are concerned about the rise in nationalism, protectionism, and trade conflicts, increasing administrative risk and complexity (Zhou & Zhou, 2020). The coronavirus pandemic has worsened these problems, which have affected travel and business, disrupted the production network, and produced deliberate complications (Hirschhorn et al., 2018).
Third, associations' operations and the development of their strategies are also significantly impacted by changes in the social and market environment (Unfccc. int, 2023). Consumer behavior and decision-making changes affect associations' approaches to product design, marketing, and customer service (Taylor & Perkins, 2021). Furthermore, the socioeconomics of the labor force and the evolving conception of work impact labor force progression, the ability of the board, and hierarchical culture (Suša, 2019, p.316).
Fourth, businesses that operate on a global scale are increasingly emphasizing manageability (Storper, 2016). According to Huang (2021), Organizations are under greater pressure than ever before to demonstrate their commitment to sustainability and responsibility as investors and customers give environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations more weight (p. 338).
Finally, the competitive environment is evolving as new competitors join the market and challenge existing business strategies (Sindi & Roe, 2017). Startups and nimble competitors are redefining markets and sectors by creating new business models using technology and creativity (Rampke, 2016).
Critical Evaluation
In the contemporary global business climate, a company's performance depends heavily on its worldwide supply chains, logistics, and transportation (Pound Sterling Live, 2021). This essay will critically evaluate how the role of global logistics, transport, and supply chains may affect that idea in order to ascertain how "organizational competitiveness and effectiveness" may be impacted for any organizations seeking to implement a global supply chain strategy today, in 2020/2021, and the future (Govindasamy & Ramakrishna, 2019).
Worldwide methods, transportation, and supply chains considerably affect an organization's proficiency and seriousness in the worldwide market (Pound Sterling Live, 2021). Organizations that effectively supervise international strategies and supply chains may work on tasks, save prices, and increase market responsiveness (Pasimeni et al., 2021). This could give firms battling the international market a large upper hand (Puri et al., 2023).
Organizations should develop strategies that put a high demand on expanding the productivity and viability of their global stockpile chains and coordinated elements (Pasimeni et al., 2021). Along with a mix of innovation and development, solid linkages and coordinated efforts with key partners are essential (Norouzi & Khademi, 2021).
Instances of specialized improvements that might boost permeability, straightforwardness, and discernibility while increasing inventory network processes incorporate blockchain, artificial intelligence, and computerization (Murariu, 2016). Moreover, strong collaborative efforts and collusion with big partners, including providers, merchants, and clients, may encourage assurance and increase the strength of the production network (Ghauri et al., 2021).
Theory to conceptualize those structural and macro disruptions, distortions, shocks and changes
The viewpoints on Globalization have shifted entirely throughout the long term, with numerous scholastics providing alternative perspectives on the uniqueness (Murariu, 2016). For example, Howl's original work from 1989 recognized Globalization as a path of growing contact among countries. It contended that organizations anticipated embracing a worldwide outlook to prevail in the worldwide commercial center (Zhou & Zhou, 2020).
STEEPLE analyses
The global scene has, in any case, gone through tremendous adjustments as of late, with massive scale disturbances and mutilations that could be sorted in a "STEEPLE examination." Researchers like Dicken (2012) and O'Sullivan have presented contrasting points of view on what these advancements might entail for Globalization. (2019).
Dicken (2012) declares that regionalization is a significant inclination because of the intricacy and discontinuity of Globalization. Likewise, he displays the expanding pertinence of creating markets and the presence of new adversaries worldwide. Dicken says that the increased attention on maintainability and ecological issues is affecting how firms perform in the worldwide market (Norouzi & Khademi, 2021).
O'Sullivan (2019) presents a more negative perspective on Globalization, saying that it has increased to greater inequalities and cultural insecurity. He ensures that the 2008 monetary emergency revealed the framework's deficiencies and that a more even-handed and durable worldwide request is required.
Scholastics have introduced varied perspectives on the subject, and in general, mentalities on Globalization have developed dramatically over the long haul (Govindasamy & Ramakrishna, 2019). The key disturbances & distortions that have happened in the global economy might be categorized using a "STEEPLE analysis." Businesses must remain current on these developments and create plans to support them if they are to compete successfully in the global economy (INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, 2022). The STEEPLE approach analyzes the macro-environmental elements that might impact an organization's strategy and operations. The term encompasses social, technical, economic, environmental, political, legal, and ethical aspects.
These components may be applied to diverse industries and geographical regions Dicken (2012) to comprehend the external influences that affect an organization's strategy. Regionalization has become a prominent trend, while Globalization has become more convoluted and fragmented, claims Dicken (2012). He contends that the growing economic power of developing nations like China, India, and Brazil poses a danger to the supremacy of the Western economy. Dicken also emphasizes the impact of technological developments such as e-commerce, automation, and artificial intelligence on the global scene (Taylor & Perkins, 2021).
O'Sullivan (2019) contends that Globalization has increased inequality and created social discontent in his assessment of the phenomenon. He argues that Globalization, which has also raised awareness of the issues with the global economic system, is to blame for the development of populism and nationalism. O'Sullivan emphasizes the need for a more just and durable international system (Ghauri et al., 2021).
Present the current status and definition of a phenomenon known as 'globalisation.'
The expression "globalization" portrays how various countries' economies, individuals, and societies are interwoven and reliant upon each other (Destek, 2020). Notwithstanding being a cycle that has existed for centuries, present-day innovation, transportation, and correspondence, headways have significantly sped up it (Crosbie. blogspot, 2012). Globalization is currently dynamic and complex (EmeraldWorksLimited, 2022). On one side, there is a pattern toward worldwide combination, with more merchandise, individuals, and capital exchange across borders (Duna, 2021). Free trade agreements, the expansion of multinational corporations, and a rise in digital technologies have all contributed to this (Bobro, 2018).
However, the trend of Globalization also meets formidable obstacles. The COVID-19 epidemic has highlighted the frailty of our interconnected civilization by upsetting supply and global trade networks (Aprile & Fiorillo, 2017, p.121). Global collaboration and integration are also in danger due to the growth of nationalism and protectionism in many regions of the world (Destek, 2020). Globalization has many implications, which have changed over time (Begou & Kassomenos, 2023). A few researchers center on the social, social and political parts of the peculiarities, while others underline the developing meaning of the interconnection of the world economy (Duna, 2021). Most definitions agree that "globalization" alludes to a universally situated course of interconnectedness and dependence propelled by mechanical, monetary, and social variables (Bobro, 2018).
3‘key factors 'are currently raging in the debates around Globalization and global strategy
The idea of "globalization" alludes to the interconnectedness and relationship of different nations' financial matters, networks, and societies (Hayuth, 2017). Regardless of how the cycle has been continuous for a long time, it has fundamentally advanced in ongoing a long time because of progressions in innovation, transport, and data (Pasimeni, Fiorini & Georgakaki, 2021). The current status of Globalization is muddled and multi-faceted. On the one hand, there is a propensity towards worldwide reconciliation, with an ascent in the development of cash, individuals, and things across global limits (O'Sullivan, 2019). This has been conceivable through international alliances, the development of global firms, and an ascent in computerized innovation (Ernst & Haar, 2019).
Not with standing, the three key worries at the focal point of the current Globalization and worldwide technique discussions are also significant (Ernst & Haar, 2019).
Figure 2: Globalisation and global strategy
Monetary Globalization is the expression used to portray the expanding incorporation of public economies into a solitary worldwide economy (Kahle & Stulz, 2017). Unlimited cross-line development of work, cash, and different assets is associated with this. Globalization of the economy has been worked with by international alliances, the development of worldwide firms, and progressions in correspondence and transportation innovation (Norouzi & Khademi, 2021). The extension of abundance holes, employment misfortunes, specifically enterprises, and the advancement of a rush to the base regarding work and ecological standards have all been credited to monetary Globalization (Murariu, 2016).
The expression "social globalization" alludes to the dispersal of social standards, values, and practices past worldwide lines (Huang, 2021). This is commonly associated with the spread of Western culture, which incorporates things like Hollywood films and inexpensive American food chains (Destek, 2020). Social Globalization does not simply influence one culture; numerous others, such as Japanese anime and Korean popular music, have also impacted the globe (Li et al., 2023). Social Globalization has gotten praise for expanding variety and cosmopolitanism yet has additionally experienced harsh criticism for killing nearby societies and customs (Kahle & Stulz, 2017).
Political Globalization's rising interconnectivity of public political frameworks and the making of worldwide administration establishments are alluded to as "political globalization “(EmeraldWorksLimited, 2022). This is because of the development of global foundations like the Global Crook Court, the World Exchange Association, and the Unified Countries (Guan et.al, 2023, p.12). Political Globalization has worked with worldwide collaboration on issues like environmental change, basic freedoms, and worldwide well-being (Kahle & Stulz, 2017). However, political Globalization has also come under criticism for purportedly weakening democratic accountability and national sovereignty (Ghauri, 2021, p.101794). The present focus of debates on Globalization and global strategy is its political, cultural, and economic effects (Hayuth, 2017, p. 158). While there are many benefits to Globalization, such as greater affluence and cross-cultural interchange, there are also drawbacks, such as economic disparity, cultural uniformity, and the erosion of national sovereignty (Hamdani et al., 2018).
Organizations and politicians must comprehend these talks and consider the ramifications of their global initiatives. Globalization experiences difficulties (Getz et al., p. 579). The Coronavirus pandemic has caused us to notice the delicacy of our connected society by disturbing worldwide trade and supply frameworks (Pound Sterling Live, 2021). The ascent of patriotism and protectionism compromises the objective of worldwide coordinated effort and mixes in different pieces of the globe (Pew Research Centre, 2023).
The idea of Globalization has been challenged and has developed over the long run (Ernst & Haar, 2019). A few scientists underscore the peculiarity's social, social, and political parts, while others stress how the worldwide economy's interconnectedness is becoming progressively significant (EmeraldWorksLimited, 2022). In any case, most definitions concur that "globalization" alludes to a course of network and reliance on a worldwide scale driven by specialized, monetary, and social reasons (Puri, Gandhi, and Kumar, 2023).
The structural changes affecting the global landscape
The structural changes influencing the global landscape are the basic modifications and transformations occurring in the global economic, political, and social systems (Ernst & Haar, 2019). These developments affect how nations, regions, and organizations engage and do business internationally (Getz, et al. 2017). The following are some of the most important structural changes affecting the global landscape.
Technological advancements: Due to the swift growth of technology, the world is changing quickly, and companies now find it simpler and more efficient to operate worldwide (Pasimeni, Fiorini, & Georgakaki, 2021).
Economic liberalisation: More possibilities for international commerce and increased economic interconnection are generated as trade and investment rules are liberalized (Gartner, Inc., 2023). According to Adams et al. (2017), Two examples of the shifting demographic patterns that affect societal standards, the global labor market, and consumer behavior include ageing populations and increasing diversity (p. 151).
Political instability: Growing social discontent, geopolitical tensions, and political irrationality pose hazards to international commerce and capital flows (Suša, 2019).
Environmental concerns: As the general public becomes more aware of environmental problems like resource depletion and climate change, there are more possibilities and hazards for global enterprises (Aprile & Fiorillo, 2017).
The neo-liberalist view of the global project, the hyper-globalist debate between the pro- & anti-globalists
The neo-liberalist global project is known as a political and economic philosophy favoring market liberalization, economic deregulation, and less government intervention in the economy (Begou & Kassomenos, 2023). According to neoliberal proponents, open markets and free trade lead to economic growth, jobs, and wealth for everyone (Crosbie. blogspot, 2012). In the hyper-globalist argument, the pro- and anti-globalist camps disagree on the benefits and drawbacks of globalization (Destek, 2020). Hyperglobalists, who support Globalization, assert that it strengthens the world economy, generates employment, and increases everyone's level of life (Storper, 2016). They claim that eliminating poverty and promoting innovation are all benefits of globalization (Crosbie. blogspot, 2012).
Figure 3: Neo-liberalism: neither new nor liberal
The argument put out by people opposed to globalization is that it has increased inequality, damaged the environment, and homogenized cultures (Begou & Kassomenos, 2023). They claim that globalization imperils local cultures and traditions, exploits labor, and helps the affluent at the cost of people experiencing poverty (Aprile & Fiorillo, 2017, p. 121). The hyper-globalist argument is based on the neo-liberal concept of the global project, which has been a major contributor to the growth of globalization (Gartner, Inc., 2023). In response to the discussion, governments, international organizations, and companies are changing their rules and practices (Vaubel and Willett, 2019).
The 'Totalist' vs. the ‘Non-Totalist’ perspectives of global strategy
Two opposing viewpoints on how businesses should handle globalization are represented by the "Totalist" and "Non-Totalist" approach to global strategy.
The "Total" point of view encourages a comprehensive and integrated global strategy in which all of the organization's activities are coordinated to attain global competitiveness (Destek, 2020). In order to achieve economies of size and scope, this approach strongly emphasizes the requirement of standardizing and centralising activities (Bobro, 2018). According to the "Totalist" approach, a company's structure, culture, and operational procedures must be completely transformed in order for it to compete effectively on a global scale (Murariu, 2016).
In contrast, the "Non-Totalist" perspective promotes a more dispersed and adaptable approach to global planning (Crosbie. blogspot, 2012). This strategy acknowledges that many markets and regions have distinctive cultural, economic, and social factors that need specialist strategies (Destek, 2020). The "Non-Totalist" approach underlines the significance of local adaptation and reaction to local market situations while still using global resources and synergies (Rampke, 2016).
The "Non-Totalist" point of view is all the more frequently seen in more modest, more versatile organizations that work in developing business sectors, rather than the "Totalist" disposition, which is for the most part connected with tremendous enterprises (INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, 2022). Prior to choosing an overall technique, associations should completely evaluate their interior capacities and the outer market climate; the two points of view offer advantages and disadvantages (Destek, 2020).
Ace your business assignment help with Native Assignment Help! Our expert team ensures precision and clarity in every project, delivering insightful analyses and strategic solutions. Don't let complex business theories hold you back; trust us for top-tier assignments that elevate your academic performance.
Conclusion
This study provides a critical assessment of the major difficulties that organizations today deal with and are anticipated to affect them in 2022–2023 and beyond. The report successfully examines how macro changes impact the global economy and the life cycles of multinational corporations. According to the study, organizations should concentrate on political, economic, and social issues while creating a global strategy. The neoliberal vision of the global project, the hyper-globalist argument between pro- and anti-globalists, and the total and non-totalised viewpoints on global strategy have been discussed. These points of view emphasize the numerous approaches organisations might take to global objectives and the possible benefits and risks associated with each strategy. The report has also shown how crucial it is to understand how macroeconomic shocks impact the world economy and how businesses may change their strategy to secure long-term survival and prosperity. The life cycle model demonstrates the potential effects of economic cycles on various global economies and organizations. Organizations must be equipped to handle these major interruptions and adjust their plans as required.
The importance of having a firm understanding of the global landscape and the ability to respond rapidly to changes in the business environment is emphasised throughout this article. By adopting a strategic and flexible strategy, organisations may effectively traverse the possibilities and challenges posed by the global environment of 2022–2023 and beyond.
References
Adams, J., Scott, P., Gallagher, J., & Parry, J. (2017). Research in an open, global landscape. New landscapes and languages of higher education, pp. 149–170.
Aprile, M. C., & Fiorillo, D. (2017). Water conservation behavior and environmental concerns: Evidence from a representative sample of Italian individuals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 159, 119-129.
Begou, P. and Kassomenos, P., 2023. The ecosystemic framework of the global environmental change and the COVID-19 pandemic. Science of The Total Environment, 857, p.159327.
Bobro, M. (2018). Collective identity in the age of globalization. The Person and the Challenges. The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II, 8(1), 121–133.
blogspot, 2012. Neo-liberalism: neither new nor liberal (Online). <https://crosbiew.blogspot.com/2012/10/government-has-only-itself-to-blame-but.html> accessed on 08.04.2023.
Destek, M.A., 2020. Investigation on the role of economic, social, and political Globalization on environment: evidence from CEECs. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(27), pp.33601-33614.
Duna, N.G., 2021. Globalisation and COVID-19-related Mental Crisis: Reconsidering Ideology of One Humanity. The Beacon: Journal for Studying Ideologies and Mental Dimensions, 4(2), p.020412320.
EmeraldWorksLimited,2022.Pestle Analyses,(online). https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMC_09.htm accessed on 17.04.2023.
Ernst, R. and Haar, J., 2019. Globalization, competitiveness, and governability: The three disruptive forces of business in the 21st century. Springer.
Gartner, Inc., 2023. Technological factor for STEEPLE analyses, (Online). https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/insights/technology-trends accessed on 17.04.2023.
Getz, K., Brown, C., Stergiopoulos, S. and Beltre, C., 2017. Baseline assessment of a global clinical investigator landscape poised for structural change. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 51(5), pp.575-581.
Ghauri, P., Strange, R. and Cooke, F.L., 2021. Research on international business: The new realities. International Business Review, 30(2), p.101794.
Govindasamy, D.P. and Ramakrishna, P.R., 2019. Contemporary Contemplation on Integrated Global Financial Climate. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8, pp.186-188.
Guan, Y., Yan, J., Shan, Y., Zhou, Y., Hang, Y., Li, R., Liu, Y., Liu, B., Nie, Q., Bruckner, B. and Feng, K., 2023. Burden of the global energy price crisis on households. Nature Energy, pp.1-13.
Hamdani, A., Hashai, N., Kandel, E., & Yafeh, Y. (2018). Technological Progress and the Future of the Corporation. J. British Acad., 6, 215-225.
Hayuth, Y., 2017. Globalisation and the port-urban interface: conflicts and opportunities. In Ports, cities, and global supply chains (pp. 157-172). Routledge.
Hirschhorn, F., Veeneman, W. and van de Velde, D., 2018. Inventory and rating of performance indicators and organisational features in metropolitan public transport: A worldwide Delphi survey. Research in Transportation Economics, 69, pp.144-156.
Huang, D. Z. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: A review and consolidation. Accounting & finance, 61(1), 335-360.
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, 2022. Economic factors, (Online). https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO accessed on 17.04.2023.
Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2017). Is the U.S. public corporation in trouble?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 67-88.
Kandil, N., Battaïa, O. and Hammami, R., 2020. Globalisation vs. Slowbalisation: a literature review of analytical models for sourcing decisions in supply chain management. Annual Reviews in Control, 49, pp.277-287.
edu, 2023. Legal factors, (online). https://www.law.cornell.edu/ accessed on 17.04.2023.
Li, X.D., Cousins, I.T. and Hornbuckle, K.C., 2023. ACS Environmental Au Recognizes 2022 Rising Stars in Environmental Research. ACS Environmental Au.
Murariu, M., 2016. The State of Research. In Totality, Charisma, Authority: The Origins and Transformations of Totalist Movements (pp. 17-46). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Norouzi, M., & Khademi, S. (2021). Geography: A Hidden Antidote to Rescue Modern Architecture. Hidden Geographies, 295-312.
O'Sullivan, S. (2019). Supply Chain Disruption: Aligning Business Strategy and Supply Chain Tactics. Kogan Page Publishers.
Pasimeni, F., Fiorini, A., & Georgakaki, A. (2021). International landscape of the inventive activity on climate change mitigation technologies. A patent analysis. Energy Strategy Reviews, 36, 100677.
Pew Research Center, 2023. Socio cultural factors, (Online). https://www.pewresearch.org/ accessed on 17.04.2023.
Pound Sterling Live, 2021. U.K. Economy to Outperform Both Eurozone and U.S. in 2022, (Online). <https://www.poundsterlinglive.com/economics/15242-uk-economy-to-outperform-both-eurozone-and-u-s-in-2022> accessed on 09.04.2023.
Puri, M., Gandhi, K. and Kumar, M.S., 2023. Emerging environmental contaminants: A global perspective on policies and regulations. Journal of Environmental Management, 332, p.117344.
Rampke, B., 2016. Interconnectedness, Healing & Harmony: The application of Ubuntu in peace research and in Namibian-German postcolonial disputes emerging from the return of human remains (Master's thesis).
Sindi, S. and Roe, M., 2017. Strategic Supply Chain Management: The Development of a Diagnostic Model. Springer.
Storper, M., 2016. The neo-liberal city as idea and reality. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(2), pp.241-263.
Suša, O. (2019). Global dynamics of socio-environmental crisis: Dangers on the way to a sustainable future. Civitas-Revista de Ciências Sociais, 19, 315-336.
Taylor, S. and Perkins, G., 2021. Work and Employment in a changing business environment. Kogan Page Publishers.
int, 2023. Environmental factors, (online). https://unfccc.int/ accessed on 17.04.2023.
Vaubel, R. and Willett, T.D., 2019. The political economy of international organizations: A public choice approach. Routledge.
Zhou, Y. and Zhou, Y., 2020. Art Under Impact of Globalization (1989–1999). A History of Contemporary Chinese Art: 1949 to Present, pp.267-333.
Share this
Cite This Work
Go Through the Best and FREE Case Studies Written by Our Academic Experts!
