The report highlights the necessary information for the infrastructure development project of a multi-school contract in Frankfurt, Germany. The report discusses all the essential information required for making decisions regarding the chosen development project. The case project selected is the multi-school contract in Frankfurt which is a typical German PPP project; it represents the importance of schools which are the major activities as still there are numerous investment require for the development of these projects (Kiplang, and Park, 2021).
Grab The Best Academic Assistance In Just One Click
Public-private partnerships in Germany are not governed by a single set of legislation (PPPs). An abundance of acts, rules, and regulations are in place instead. But, the state and federal representatives now understand the significance of PPPs for upcoming future growth in the public sector. Several pieces of legislation have been passed in Germany to support PPPs, with the PPP Acceleration Act being the most prominent. Institutions established by the federal government are also in charge of coordinating and promoting the growth of PPPs in Germany. Recently, around 100 PPP projects are planned or are in the application stage in Germany. They include both large-scale projects, like the multibillion-euro expansions of highways, and smaller ones, like the expansion and repair of schools, hospitals and jails (Klein, 2015). The federal government and various states have implemented legislative procedures extending from regulations and requirements for the participation of public and private associates to the intended purposes of such cooperation to assist the development and execution of PPPs. Both the quantity and the value of PPPs in Germany are anticipated to rise in the wake of the recent financial crisis. The development of new regulations to simplify PPP implementation and planning is proceeding.
The city of Frankfurt has put out to bid a set of four schools that have already been up and running; the contract covers infrastructure and facility development, design, execution, financing, operation, and management. This study analyses and discusses the "PPP schools Frankfurt" project, which serves as an example of a standard German PPP project. It explains the project and the consequences for the next PPP initiatives in Germany and worldwide (Kostka, 2016). Since there are significant capital requirements, constrained public finances, and significant benefits to using PPP type of frameworks for public sector infrastructural development, property investment, and functions, schools are a prominent focus of PPP operations in Germany.
Scope of project
The issue of significant investment demands for schools in Frankfurt's city was forced on by aging building infrastructures, new fire safety standards, and safety precautions. The project "PPP schools Frankfurt" is a collection of three schools and a cultural and education hub for a total of 5.250 students, as stated in the accompanying table. The project is one of the biggest PPP schools in Germany, with a total investment amount of € 108 million and an estimated contract amount of € 248 million. In terms of investment requirements and NPV, school bundling is now frequently utilized to group PPP projects with higher capital volumes. Even though the project was originally intended to be a renovation, the idea was revised to include both new construction and renovation of some facilities and structures (Klein, 2015). The entire value chain of the resources is handed to private sector partners, comprising financing, operating, and maintaining infrastructure and facilities. Each project has a unique set of development, management, maintenance and user requirement, which correlates to the project's overall size and complexity.
Development of a suitable stakeholder engagement strategy
Even though there are significant multinational corporations among the special purpose vehicle owners, a sizable portion of the development, operation, and maintenance procedures are outsourced to small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs). Due to the dominance of SMEs in Germany's infrastructure facilities management and construction sector, involving local SMEs is frequently a top priority for the public sector. Construction processes for this particular project comprised 348 subcontractors, of whom 50% were from the Frankfurt/Rhine-Main area and 60% were small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). In the region, SMEs receive subcontracts for roughly 30% of the facilities management services or about 40% of the total.
Risks for prospective investors
The German procurement legislation has currently undergone modification by the German parliament. The requirement to purchase large amounts of product and services in many lots rather than as a single thorough bundle is particularly tightened by the new regulation.It was stated that this change may harm future PPPs by requiring the contractor to subdivide PPP contracts, which could also lower the performance of the projects. The new rule does, however, permit public agencies to distribute various properties as part of a single package where necessary for technical or financial reasons (Calhoun, et. al.2016). This clause offers plenty of leeway for preserving the execution of complete PPP projects in Germany. Additionally, there are certain circumstances in which a division into "vertical" amount lots may be appropriate. For instance, it would be effective to divide the 60 school facilities in one area into either two or three lots, each with 30 or 20 structures, depending on the amount of work that has to be done on them.
The topic of who will assume the possibility of a decline in demand is likely that the extremely contentious one in the negotiations in the lead to a PPP contract at the stage of each specific PPP project. Frequently, the public partner tries to move the liability to the potential investor. If the real demand is lower than anticipated, the private investor is forced to shoulder the costs. For instance, the present financial crisis may result in fewer heavy-goods vehicle (HGV) traffic on highways (Rothballer, and Gerbert, 2015). However, the HGV toll collection may be less than anticipated or perhaps fewer patients than anticipated are visiting medical facilities managed by PPP programs. Due to the private investor's reliance on project earnings to fund the project, this might put them in a precarious situation. The investor can become bankrupt if the numbers don't stack up. The private investment must consequently require that the public partner accept the possibility of a demand decline. Only if the reduction in sales can be ascribed entirely to the private investor's competence which might take on this risk.
Development of suitable governance arrangements
The federal, state and local levels of the Federal Republic of Germany each have their own set of regulatory framework requirements, including public financing, taxes, and approval processes. Governmental endeavours like schools, townships, cities, or communities control the land and the structures, and they are responsible for assigning the students to various educational institutions like secondary, primary, and vocational schools as well as to particular institutions. They must offer sufficient capacity for various kinds of services (Carpintero and Siemiatycki, 2015). The organizations are in charge of providing efficient and effective services, such as cleanliness, upkeep, utility administration, supply, and removal. On the other side, they have discretion in private affairs, such as the budgetary distribution of instructors, staff, or upkeep. The program is under the control of the state of Hesse, which also grants local governments/municipalities international and project-specific funding reimbursements in exchange for documentation of the funds' proper usage. The state budget includes funding for teachers. With a recent emphasis on federal financing programs, the federal government offers extra incentives, such as those for all-day school expansions or vigorous building and facility restoration. These funding initiatives can be incorporated into PPP projects' lengthy financial plans.
Local governments and communities may offer projects as PPPs under European legislative framework requirements, but before contracts are signed, supervisory bodies like the state audit office must assess the proposals (Ahmed and Iqbal, 2015). The net present value (NPV) of lifespan expenses is compared toward the NPV of the expected lifecycle costs of traditional delivery to determine whether value for money has been achieved (PSC)
Development of a suitable funding strategy
Reimbursement arrangements are based on set monthly payments for services once the buildings are operating using a project financing structure. The payments are based on the facilities and services being accessible both during school hours and thereafter to ensure supplementary utilization, such as by athletic groups. The temporary fixes adhered closely to established patterns and were controlled beyond ordinary functioning (Valentukeviciute, 2021). Penalties may be added to the monthly instalments if certain requirements are not met or if the level of service is subpar. Such errors or flaws are reported to a central helpdesk run by IT if they occur. Because these so-called Service Level Agreements (SLAs), essentially govern the user's requirements about the quality and quantities of services, specifying timeframes for their deletion, the private partner then has to remove them. For instance, a cracked window must be fixed within xx hours, and any painting on a wall must be covered up or eliminated before xx hours.
The project is rather large-scale for German PPP projects with a combined contract volume of € 248 million. Because the city of Frankfurt is aware of the benefits of project financing, the project was put out to bid using a project financing framework. To ensure accountability for all project-related expenditures of the authority, project funding is divided into five tranches, one for each school and one for management fees (Alfen, and Barckhahn, 2017). The project's equity investment by the project's equity investors, an effective special relationship for the construction, and a performance bond for the remaining three years of the implementation phase to assure the requirements for project transfer reserve accounts for the special purpose company are major securities for the city of Frankfurt. Additionally, a restriction on the dissemination of stock and debt was agreed upon. The associated banks have the authority to step in and take over for the special-purpose company in the event of insolvency or contract cancellation.
Clear and justified recommendations for the project board
Public funding for a project can come from government sources such as grants, loans, or tax incentives. It has the advantage of being generally more accessible, but may come with strings attached such as specific requirements or conditions on how the funds are used. The most appropriate funding option for a project will depend on a variety of factors, including the goals of the project, the industry and market, the financial resources and goals of the project team, and the political and regulatory environment. In general, a project board should carefully consider each option and make a recommendation based on what best aligns with their goals and priorities.
Professional project report (layout, structure, presentation)
European-wide tendering is required by law for public sector projects having a valuation of even more than € 193,000 for services or € 4,845 million for construction. The majority of PPP projects in Germany are bid on using a negotiation process that includes the steps of bidding documents, pre-qualification (PQ), invitation to tender (ITT), acquiescence of indicative bids, negotiations, an invitation to submit a best and final offer (BAFO), contractual close, and, following authority approval, financial close (Palcicet. al. 2022). It is crucial to maintain a substantial number of participating consortia in the process to ensure competition throughout the whole process until the contractual close.
Pre-qualification was employed in the negotiating process for the project "PPP schools Frankfurt." The tender notice was released in April 2005, and 30 bidding consortia asked to participate. This indicates the significant interest private sector enterprises have in investing in PPP in Germany, as well as the fierce competition. The city submitted ITT to the five pre-qualified bidder consortiums in September 2005. There were only four proposals filed, one of which had to be rejected, thus the other three offers were assessed using the established criteria. As a consequence of the bid examination, it was determined that some of the buildings would benefit more from new construction than from the initially proposed rehabilitation of all existing structures (Verger, 2019). Due to the favoured bidder's unsatisfactory performance and the discussions' slow pace, the process was delayed and two extensions of the binding bid periods were required. As a result, discussions with the favoured bidder were abandoned and the consortium that came second in the bidding process was asked to participate. In April 2007, negotiations with the HOCHTIEF consortia came to a commercial finish. The financial closing and transaction execution occurred in July 2007 following municipal council permission. August 2009 saw the completion of construction, and all projects are still effectively running today.
Models to help analysis
The phases explained below could be applied to analyze the typical phases of the PPP project.
Phase I: classification of possible projects
In this phase I, it is very important for the public partner to classify and identify all the likely projects and to measure the demand of economic for PPPs, and the technological and legal viability of a project. The federal constituent law might require whole control over the public authority for a particular service or institution, or maybe just for some levels of control of the public on the procedure.
For example, the Basic Constitutional Law specifiesin article 33 paragraph 4 that civil retainers have the power over administrative authorization. Sothe administrative and constitutional structure of a PPP might need a specific commercial arrangement for the private partner (Guo et. al. 2017). The rules governing public subsidies, tax, budget, and investment policies may have a significant impact on a project's ability to raise the necessary funds.Additionally, the project needs to abide by the state assistance rules outlined in Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty. For instance, it is very important to establishstate guarantees ordirect payments from the government to finance a PPP project to qualify as illegal state assistance. The state budget legislation and the Federal Budget Law require that the financial viability of a project be proven. This calls for a PPP project economic analysis and comparison to the project's implementation using a "traditional" procurement basis (Zancajo, et. al.2021).Additionally, the budget laws may impose restrictions on the use or sale of public property as well as mandate a clearance process.A few federal states have implemented judicial rules to encourage the growth of PPPs since such restrictions and requirements may make it difficult to implement PPPs.
Phase II: preparation and planning
In this phase II, the public associateis required to grow a commissionand also the implementation which is associatedwith the specifications. It requires the analysis of the fundamental of projects and their characteristics, for example, the time limit, which is appropriatefor the model of the contract and various levels of public control. This phase, corporate law and contracts have a very essential role. These apprehensions, the applied kind of contract, all describe the partner’sshared obligations and rights, over the several different models of finance and the corporate designing of the project. In Frankfurt, Germany, a variety of contract might be applied depending on the PPP projects like franchise agreements or rentalcontracts and these models involves management and supply agreements, various lease, and franchise models,and some of the private ownerships and assets utilization model. For example, in some of the cases of concession models, it is very important to have some legal advice for further making sure that the amount charged as the price by a private company conforms with rules and laws related to public fees and taxes.
Phase III: award procedure
The III phase talks about, how the public partner typically regulates a contract reward process and attracts applications from various interested private companies. Based on section 2 of the Procurement Ordinance, If the project's amount increase a predetermined limit, such as in year 2008 it was €412,000 for services and supplies related to water, transportation, and energy, the other was of €133,000 for supplies which are general and services relayed to the federal government institutions, €206,000 were used for all other general services, and for construction projects amount of €5,150,000 was utilized, the PPP project is part of a formal reward process. Even if the project stays under the criteria in the Procurement Law, budget regulations may nevertheless demand a tender. A European-wide contract is frequently required under procurement law, and section 107 et seq Federal Act on Restrictions on Contest grants the applicant the right to pursue legal solutions ahead of a public procurement committee (Krönke, 2020). An achievement notification, success requirements, and a rewards procedure must all be prepared and published by the public partner in line with procurement rules.Legal counsel is sometimes required at this point to make certain that the process conforms with all relevant laws and the rights of bidders are properly upheld.
Phase IV: implementation and controlling
In phase IV, after the implementation of the project. The regulations of public and private construction law, transportation law, civil law and environmental laws may apply in the event of a construction or transportation project, for example, during this phase depending on the subject matter. The private organization can be required to hire public employees if the project has to take over a service that has previously been managed by the government. The purpose of public service regulation and pertinent laws of specific and cooperative labour law is necessary for this.
Conclusion
After deeply studying the successful operation of the case study of the Frankfurt schools project PPP, it is concluded that all the buildings which were constructed under the project were delivered faster in comparison to other projects, and with the speedy construction, the project was also completed in the specified time and within the given budget. The service provided, and the quality which was been maintained of the building was very high in comparison to the traditional procurement. The implementation of the PPP requirements and the sustainable commitment of all the politicians and the administration which were involved in this project were very dedicated. Further involvements of all the users which are relayed to schools, staff and teachers were quite standard and very helpful.
The major drawback analyzed by the report was that a team of legal, technological, and financial advisors was further required for proposing the procedure. One more limitation analyzed in the case study was the requirements of specification which needed to be based on output to access the private sector. The major important aspect of Frankfurt City is that the Net Present Value of the contract of PPP is further calculated to be around 15% less than the traditional project delivery NPV. The report also recommends the model which the project can consider for implementation and better results.
Reference
Ahmed, I. and Iqbal, M., 2015. Exploring New Dimensions in Public-Private Partnerships in Education. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Alfen, H.W. and Barckhahn, S., 2017. PPP and Infrastructure. Understanding German Real Estate Markets, pp.473-490.
Calhoun, C., Mendieta, E. and VanAntwerpen, J., 2016. Habermas and religion. John Wiley & Sons.
Carpintero, S. and Siemiatycki, M., 2015. PPP projects in local infrastructure: Evidence from schools in the Madrid region, Spain. Public Money & Management, 35(6), pp.439-446.
Guo, S., Li, H., Guo, Y. and Gao, K., 2017. The experience and reference on PPP development in Germany. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 5(6), pp.327-333.
Kiplang, Z. and Park, S., 2021. Utility-scale Solar PV Adoption: Public-Private Partnership as a Stimulating Instrument. ?????????????, pp.221-222.
Klein, M., 2015. Public-Private Partnerships.
Klein, M.U., 2015. Public-private partnerships: Promise and hype. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (7340).
Kostka, G., 2016. Large infrastructure projects in germany. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Krönke, C., 2020. PPP and concessions in Germany. In Public-Private Partnerships and Concessions in the EU (pp. 71-88). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Palcic, D., Reeves, E., Flannery, D. and Geddes, R.R., 2022. Public-private partnership tendering periods: an international comparative analysis. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 25(2), pp.156-172.
Rothballer, C. and Gerbert, P., 2015. Preparing and structuring bankable PPP projects. Public private partnerships for infrastructure and business development: Principles, practices, and perspectives, pp.57-80.
Valentukeviciute, L., 2021. Camouflaged Privatization: The Influence of the Fratzscher Commission and PricewaterhouseCoopers on Berlin’s Schools. Professional Service Firms and Politics in a Global Era: Public Policy, Private Expertise, pp.237-248.
Verger, A., 2019. Partnering with non-governmental organizations in public education: contributions to an ongoing debate. Journal of Educational Administration.
Zancajo, A., Fontdevila, C., Verger, A. and Bonal, X., 2021. Regulating public-private partnerships, governing non-state schools: an equity perspective: Background paper for UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report.
