Samsung, a diversified global conglomerate, has been at the forefront of cutting-edge technology, innovation, and digital transformation for decades. From electronics to mobile technology to retail, textile, food processing, and construction among others, Samsung has presence in a wide variety of industries and business segments. In this report, we will analyze Samsung’s current market position, performance, and growth potential through the lens of innovation, adaptability, and agility. This report will examine the technological innovations and change management policies that help Samsung stay relevant and maintain its market position. Besides analysing the relative merits and demerits of Samsung’s business strategies, processes, and practices, we will also share actionable insights and recommendations that could be used by Samsung to further enhance its performance.
Organisation’s Profile and Background Information
Samsung, a multinational enterprise-scale company, headquartered in Suwon-Si, South Korea, predominantly operates in the telecommunication, information technology, consumer electronics, chipmaking, and the broader electronics sector. In addition, Samsung has a notable presence in industries, such as financial services, construction, and shipbuilding.
Figure: Samsung
As of April 2023, Samsung Electronics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Samsung, commands a sizeable market share in mobile devices, mobile and IT communications, and semiconductor industries across the globe. While Samsung, with an average market share of 20% in the last five years, contends for the top spot with competitors like Apple in the smartphone segment, it has maintained clear supremacy and dominance in the memory chipmaking segment of the semiconductor industry, by consistently commanding a market share in excess of 30% globally.
Despite economic headwinds and challenges in the recent past, Samsung has consistently demonstrated resilience and robust growth. This becomes immediately evident from the following piece of data. From an annual turnover of 200 trillion KRW in 2017, Samsung raised its annual revenue to 279 trillion KRW (or about USD 230 billion) in 2022, marking an absolute growth of almost 40%. Data suggests that this growth was primarily driven by Samsung’s superlative performance in the semiconductor, consumer electronics, and mobile communication & technology segments. Further, to bolster its inorganic growth and enhance its technological prowess, the company has focused on mergers, acquisitions, and strategic partnerships in different markets.
Figure: Samsung Worldwide Smartphone Sales
Current Issues Facing the Organisations
Key Challenges Faced by Samsung
Extreme competition:
Samsung operates in competitive industry segments, such as consumer electronics, telecommunication, and semiconductor manufacturing. Let’s take the smartphone market as an example, where Samsung is a major player. To protect and boost its market share, it is compelled to stave off competition from other major manufacturers like Apple, and upstart Chinese brands that offer premium smartphones and high-specification devices at lower prices. In the supercompetitive advanced chip technology space, it is pitted against giants, such as TSMC and Intel that stand as a barrier to its growth aspirations. To maintain its pole position in the market, Samsung is forced to continuously pump in money and resources to support its innovation and technology modernization activities.
Global Supply Chain Disruptions:
In the last few years, the global supply chain has been in disarray due to political and social unrests, other destabilizing factors, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, and complex trade hurdles. For a global manufacturer like Samsung, this meant contending with difficulties in procurement of raw materials, leading to production delays and ballooning expenses, impacting its profit margins. This problem has been even more pronounced in the semiconductor space, where chip shortages have led to manufacturing delays, product release postponements, and loss of revenue.
Pressure of constant innovation and business transformation:
Advancements in areas, such as AI, ML, IoT, 5G, wearables and other communication technologies mean a global conglomerate like Samsung must constantly innovate and adapt to gain and maintain business momentum. The market demands that legacy companies, such as Samsung, constantly display nimbleness and agility in integrating new technologies and practices into its business operations to not stay relevant but to be a pioneering technology company.
Need to track and adapt to evolving consumer preferences and new market trends:
The modern consumer demands not just great products but complete accountability and transparency in business practices. They demand sustainable and environmentally safe products that are smart, easy-to-use, and cost-effective. To keep up with changes in modern consumer tastes and expectations, Samsung is compelled to constantly change or rearrange its business priorities.
Dealing with regulatory and compliance issues:
As a multinational corporation, with presence across the globe, Samsung often finds itself in the crosshairs of conflicting geopolitical interests. It must not only adapt to global security standards, but also comply with divergent regulatory environments across countries. Furthermore, it must withstand the increased scrutiny in terms of antitrust, cybersecurity, and data privacy regulations, and negotiate complex geopolitical conflicts, such as the ongoing trade war between the USA and China(Dodgson, Gann and Salter, 2006)..
Figure: Key Challenges Faced by Samsung
Examining Samsung’s Challenges with the Help of SWOT Analysis
Strengths (Internal)
Strong research and technology capabilities: Samsung’s unquestioned leadership in technology and innovation, puts it on solid footing when it comes to navigating industry and sociopolitical challenges.
Diversified portfolio of products and businesses: Samsung’s product and service offerings across multiple sectors and industries diminishes its reliance on any one market or industry – thereby reinforcing its business foundation and creating a natural cross-sectoral synergy.
Instant brand recognition and strong market presence: As a global brand, with presence across multiple geographies, markets, and segments, Samsung has access to a large customer base, deep market penetration, and strong brand influence.
Weaknesses (Internal)
Overreliance on a few sectors: Despite being a diversified conglomerate, Samsung is heavily leveraged in only a few sectors, such as smartphone, wearables, consumer electronics, mobile communication, and semiconductor.
Complex corporate structure: While the subsidiaries work in a decentralized, semiautonomous fashion, being a part of a large legacy organization exposes them to bureaucratic inefficiencies, making them inert to new ideas, technologies, and trends.
Lack of cohesion in software development and integration: Unlike Apple or Google, Samsung is not as focused on software development and integration as it is on the hardware and manufacturing side, thereby introducing an inefficiency into its electronics and telecommunications ecosystem. Opportunities (External)
New-age technologies: Being at the vanguard of new and emerging technologies, such as AI, 5G, ML, and IoT, Samsung can further expand its presence across markets, product categories, and audience segments.
Leading sustainable technology growth: There is an increasing demand for sustainable products that are powered by smart technology. Samsung is uniquely positioned to create awareness around sustainable products and drive global change in consumer habits and preferences.
Market expansions: By creating efficient, affordable, and user-friendly technology, Samsung can expand into new markets, and augment its customer base and loyalty.
Threats (External)
An intensely competitive business landscape: In a market, where Samsung must co-exist with companies like Apple and Huawei, it is not a choice; it’s an absolute imperative.
Unstable supply chains: Unstable supply chains, affected by geopolitical upheavals, can throw a spanner in the works anytime.
Regulatory obstacles: Increasing awareness about and inspections of anticompetitive practices, data privacy breaches, and other security issues can expose the company to financial penalties, legal problems, and government interventions, which could result in loss of consumer confidence.
Analysing Barriers to Change Within Samsung with the Help of Lewin's Change Management Model
Let us now put Samsung’s change management strategies to a litmus test. With the help of Lewin’s Change Management model, we will analyse the barriers to Samsung’s transformation and growth. The model breaks down and examines change in three stages, namely, Unfreezing, Change, and Refreezing.
Organizational resistance to change: Often organizations as large as Samsung fall prey to organizational inertia. It can lead to resistance towards change and adoption of new technologies, ideas, and approaches. Additionally, it can hinder growth and adaptability – where entrenched corporate cultures and long-established practices could take precedence over the need to transform in keeping pace with the changing times and trends.
Employee resistance to change: This usually happens when employees cannot keep pace with changes in technology, processes, and industry best practices. Employees resist change as they fear potential job losses, inability to come out of their comfort zones, and uncomfortable management decisions. Change Stage Barriers
Inefficient resource management: To constantly change, innovate, and grow, a company requires abundant resources in the form of money, time, raw materials, workforce, and more.
Not addressing communication gaps: In a large conglomerate like Samsung, there is a need to quickly communicate change management policies, strategies, and decisions to various stakeholders, managers, employees, and change agents. Refreezing Stage Barriers
Reverting to old habits: Instituting and driving changes in a sprawling and diversified company like Samsung can be a challenge, given that there is a propensity among the management as well as employees to revert to old habits or hindering the process of change.
Not setting up safeguards against external threats: A global and highly diversified company like Samsung can be quite vulnerable to external factors, such as market volatilities, global unrest, compliance and regulatory changes, and technological disruptions.
Current innovative/change processes & critical evaluation the organisation
Samsung's commitment of technology supremacy and responsiveness to the market shapes its approach to creativity and shift control. The organization's framework for handling novel ideas and shifts is comprehensive and strong, fitting to its scope, difficulty, as well as range of industry operations.
Commitment to R&D and Technological Leadership
Samsung makes huge investments in research and development (R&D), which is a major source of company innovations. Its significant yearly expenditure on research and development, which routinely places it among the top globally, demonstrates this dedication. The goal of this financial commitment is to support emerging technological industries like IoT, 5G, AI, and semiconductors(Hage, 1999).
Important Advances:
Creation of cutting-edge chip production methods and other cutting-edge semiconductor technology.
Innovative work in the areas of infrastructures and 5G technology
Open Innovation and Strategic Partnerships
Samsung regularly participates in free innovation because it understands the limitations of its own development. Working together with new businesses, colleges and universities, and additional tech enterprises is part of this strategy.
Important Advances:
The venture fund arm Samsung NEXT makes investments in companies that show promise and fit with Samsung's over time business goals.
Collaborations with university departments and research centres to promote creativity and gain entry to revolutionary studies(Bethke, 1986).
User-Centric Product Development
Recognizing customer requirements and integrating these requirements into its manufacturing process is a major priority for Samsung. This strategy makes sure that advancements are both consumer-friendly and scientifically cutting-edge.
Important Advances:
Customer input is incorporated into the functioning and aesthetic of goods like household appliances and cell phones.
Creation of services focused on the needs of the client and interfaces that are intuitive.
Digital Transformation and Agile Practices
Because of quickly changing economic situations and innovative headways, Samsung has been embracing coordinated techniques and advanced change systems across its tasks (Suraeva and Popova, 2023).
Important Advances:
Executing adaptable work cycles and task management methods in programming improvement and different regions.
Digitalizing inside cycles and client cooperation to further develop proficiency and responsiveness.
Sustainability and Eco-Innovation
With an expanding worldwide spotlight on manageability, Samsung has integrated eco-accommodating advancements into its item plan and functional cycles (Galetsi, Katsaliaki and Kumar, 2023).
Important Advances:
Send off items with energy-productive elements and practical materials.
Obligation to diminish ozone-depleting substance outflows in assembling and production network tasks.
Global Market Adaptation
Samsung's advancement interaction is additionally equipped to adjust to various worldwide market requests, guaranteeing that items and administrations are custom-fitted to territorial requirements and inclinations(Ince, 2023).
Important Advances:
Customization of item highlights and promoting procedures to suit different shopper bunches in different global business sectors.
Development of administration organizations and neighbourhood Research and development focuses on all the more likely comprehending and answering territorial market elements.
Culture of Continuous Learning and Adaptability
Perceiving the quick speed of innovative change, Samsung encourages a culture of consistent learning and flexibility among its labour force.
Important Advances:
Broad worker preparing projects and opening doors for ability advancement.
Support of imaginative reasoning and development at all levels of the association(Junge, 2023).
Innovative-Based Issues within Samsung
Samsung has a strong dedication to innovation, however the company's ability and efficacy in this area are challenged by a number of problems. Although the aforementioned issues are typical of big, technologically advanced businesses, they are more noticeable in light of the company's size and reach.
Balancing Core and New Businesses
One of the critical difficulties Samsung faces is adjusting speculation and concentration between its centre organizations (like cell phones and customer gadgets) and rising advancements (like artificial intelligence and IoT). While centre organizations give consistent income, rising regions are significant for future development. Finding some kind of harmony is testing and now and then prompts either over-venture or under-interest in key regions(Wang et al., 2023).
Fast-Paced Technological Changes
The innovation area is described by fast changes and developments. For an enormous organization like Samsung, staying up with these changes, particularly in regions like programming refreshes, UI enhancements, and coordinating new advancements into existing product offerings, can challenge. Quick innovative advancement sporadically prompts Samsung to linger behind more modest, more light-footed contenders.
Intellectual Property and Patent Issues
Samsung works in a profoundly serious market where licensed innovation (IP) and licenses are basic. The organization has once in a while confronted lawful difficulties and patent questions with contenders, which can block its capacity to uninhibitedly develop. Exploring these intricate IP scenes while attempting to keep an upper hand is a steady test.
Cultural and Organizational Barriers to Innovation
While Samsung has been pursuing cultivating a culture of development, there are as yet imbued components of conventional corporate culture that can be hindrances. This incorporates hazard avoidance, progressive dynamic cycles, and an emphasis on steady as opposed to leading-edge developments. These social viewpoints can dial back the advancement interaction and hamper innovativeness(Moslehpour et al., 2023).
Market Saturation in Core Areas
Saturated business sectors is a big problem in sectors like smartphones, where Samsung has been a major player. Introducing cutting-edge characteristics or goods that can drive demand is getting harder and harder. Due to saturation of the market, novel product groups must be redefined through innovation or by exploring frontier markets.
Sustainability and Environmental Concerns
As natural worries become more unmistakable, Samsung faces the test of integrating manageability into its advancement procedure. This incorporates creating eco-accommodating items as well as guaranteeing practical assembling processes. Offsetting ecological contemplations with innovative headways and buyer assumptions is an intricate errand.
Overall, it can be said that although Samsung keeps on being a forerunner in innovation and development, it faces different difficulties that come from fast mechanical headways, market elements, legitimate and IP issues, social obstructions, and ecological worries. Resolving these issues is vital for supporting its development energy and keeping up with its strategic advantage in the worldwide market (Tobing and Sunardi, 2023).
Any Leadership-Based problems/issues?
Samsung, as a worldwide innovator in innovation, faces a scope of authority challenges that are both perplexing and complex, principally originating from its customary corporate culture, authority progression issues, the requirement for versatility in a high-speed worldwide market, and the developing requests of computerized change and moral initiative. At its centre, Samsung's initiative model has been generally established in a progressive, hierarchical methodology, regular of South Korean chaebols. This construction, while adding to Samsung's ascent as an innovation force to be reckoned with, likewise presents critical difficulties. The incorporated dynamic interaction can prompt hazard avoidance, possibly easing back the organization's reaction to quickly changing business sector elements and smothering advancement at lower hierarchical levels. Representatives in such conditions could feel less enabled to start and seek after imaginative thoughts, affecting the generally imaginative result of the organization. Progression arranging and authority security have been other basic issues for Samsung(D., 2021). The lawful difficulties including key pioneers, like the case with Lee Jae-Yong, have prompted times of vulnerability and raised worries over corporate administration and moral authority. This unsteadiness can have extensive ramifications, from influencing key decision-production to influencing long-haul arranging and financial backer certainty. The initiative's capacity to explore these difficulties while keeping an unmistakable and predictable vital bearing is critical for Samsung's supported development and market administration. One more test lies in Samsung's need to adjust to assorted worldwide market elements. Successful worldwide administration in an organization as tremendous as Samsung requires not just a thorough comprehension of different worldwide business sectors but also the capacity to offset worldwide normalization with neighbourhood variation. This is especially difficult given the different administrative conditions, social subtleties, and buyer inclinations across locales. There's a developing requirement for Samsung to decentralize a portion of its dynamic cycles, giving more independence to nearby offices to answer all the more really to territorial market patterns. Moreover, the quick computerized change across enterprises requires a change in authority style. Samsung's conventional initiative might have to develop towards a more nimble, versatile, and carefully canny model. This change includes cultivating a culture that embraces computerized development, supports constant learning, and is receptive to innovative changes. Ultimately, the rising significance of maintainability and moral strategic policies in the present corporate world presents another authority challenge for Samsung. The organization needs to guarantee its chiefs are not just dedicated to supportable practices in regions like assembling and natural administration but also maintain exclusive requirements of moral direction. Reinforcing corporate social obligation drives and considering pioneers responsible for manageable and moral practices is turning out to be progressively indispensable for keeping up with buyer trust and corporate standing(Prakasam, 2023).
Recommendation
To address the initiative and development-based difficulties confronting Samsung, an all-encompassing methodology coordinating key speculations and cycles is vital. Initially, embracing a groundbreaking initiative style could catalyze the fundamental social shift towards a more imaginative and versatile association. A groundbreaking initiative, as hypothesized by Bass and Avolio, urges pioneers to rouse and persuade representatives, encouraging a culture that embraces innovativeness and change. Samsung's administration can go through preparing projects to foster abilities in really imparting a common vision, empowering risk-taking, and enabling workers to contribute creative thoughts. Besides, consolidating components of Kotter's 8-Step Change Model can direct Samsung in tending to explicit authority and hierarchical difficulties. Laying out a need to keep moving and making a directing alliance inside the organization can handle issues connected with hazard avoidance and dynamic deferrals. This includes clear correspondence from top initiatives about the requirement for change and building an alliance of key powerhouses inside the association to drive the change interaction. As far as supporting advancement, Samsung ought to embrace standards from the Lean Startup philosophy, underlining iterative turn of events and speedy transformation. This can moderate difficulties connected with fast innovative changes and market immersion. Empowering cross-practical joint effort and making little, lithe groups can work with fast prototyping and testing of novel thoughts, encouraging a more imaginative and dynamic item improvement process. In conclusion, integrating manageability standards into the development cycle lines up with the Triple Bottom Line theory, which thinks about the natural and social effects close by monetary execution. Samsung can lay out clear supportability objectives, coordinating eco-accommodating practices into item plans and assembling processes. This not only addresses the ecological worries featured in the past segment but additionally resounds with the developing purchaser's interest for feasible and morally delivered innovation.
For the time being, Samsung can execute a development-run approach roused by Design Thinking techniques. This includes sorting out cross-useful groups to strongly centre on unambiguous difficulties or item enhancements, empowering quick ideation and prototyping to quickly address market requests and arising advancements. Moreover, utilizing open advancement stages to team up with outside accomplices and new businesses can infuse new viewpoints and speed up item improvement. Focusing on the long haul, Samsung ought to decisively put resources into basic advances like man-made reasoning and maintainable practices. Creating man-made intelligence-driven arrangements upgrades item capacities as well as positions Samsung at the front line of innovative advancement. Moreover, a guarantee to practical development, including eco-accommodating materials and dependable assembling, lines up with long-haul worldwide patterns, meeting customer assumptions for naturally cognizant items and guaranteeing the organization's flexibility in a changing business scene.
Conclusion
So, it can be concluded from the study that A complicated picture emerged from the examination of Samsung's creativity, managing changes, and management problems. A bureaucratic leadership paradigm, uncertainty surrounding order, market saturation, and the requirement for environmentally friendly procedures are some of the obstacles that have been noted. The proposal includes adopting a sustainable approach, adopting flexibility through the application of Lean Startup concepts, and implementing a transformative management shift. By implementing these tactics, Samsung may not only overcome the obstacles of the present, but also establish itself as a creative, flexible, and morally upright leader in the rapidly evolving global technological industry.
Wondering who can write your assignment best?
Choose our expert Professional Assignment Writers trusted by thousands of students across the UK for their unmatched academic expertise and dedication. Whether it's essays, dissertations, reports, or case studies, our writers deliver top-notch content that meets university standards. We guarantee well-researched, plagiarism-free work, accurate formatting, and on-time delivery for every project. Let our reliable team support your academic journey and help you achieve the grades you deserve with ease and confidence.
References
D., 2021. The Influence of Work Environment and Leadership Style on Employee Productivity. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS, [online] 04(02). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v4-i2-02.
Bethke, W.M., 1986. Setting Corporate Goals and Objectives for Asset/Liability Management. ICFA Continuing Education Series, [online] 1986(2), pp.46–54. https://doi.org/10.2469/cp.v1986.n2.7.
Galetsi, P., Katsaliaki, K. and Kumar, S., 2023. Realizing Resilient Global Market Opportunities and Societal Benefits Through Innovative Digital Technologies in the Post COVID-19 Era: A Conceptual Framework and Critical Literature Review. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, [online] pp.1–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2023.3303080.
Hage, J.T., 1999. ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE. Annual Review of Sociology, [online] 25(1), pp.597–622. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.597.
Ince, F., 2023. The Digital Edge for Entrepreneurship. Digital Natives as a Disruptive Force in Asian Businesses and Societies, [online] pp.1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6782-4.ch001.
Junge, I.P., 2023. Designerly Ways of Entrepreneuring for a Sustainable Circular Economy - Envisioning a Smartphone Firm of the Future. Circular Economy and Sustainability. [online] https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-023-00292-z.
Moslehpour, M., Faez, S.E.P., Gupta, B.B. and Arya, V., 2023. A Fuzzy-Based Analysis of the Mediating Factors Affecting Sustainable Purchase Intentions of Smartphones: The Case of Two Brands in Two Asian Countries. Sustainability, [online] 15(12), p.9396. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129396.
Prakasam, N., 2023. Leadership. [online] SAGE. Available at: <http://books.google.ie/books?id=JpGREAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Leadership+:+A+Diverse,+Inclusive+and+Critical+Approach&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api>.
Suraeva, M.O. and Popova, E.S., 2023. Sustainable Development of Russian Business: Management Challenges and Innovative Solutions. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, [online] pp.292–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38122-5_41.
Tobing, C.I.L. and Sunardi, 2023. User Experience Analysis of Indonesia Train Booking Mobile Application Using User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) and Usability Testing. 2023 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech). [online] https://doi.org/10.1109/icimtech59029.2023.10277833.
Wang, H., Zheng, L.J., Zhang, J.Z., Behl, A., Arya, V. and Rafsanjani, M.K., 2023. The dark side of foreign firm presence: How does the knowledge spillover from foreign direct investment influence the new venture performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, [online] 8(3), p.100399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.10039
