Seismic Design Techniques for Earthquake-Resistant Structures
If you want to be successful in your assignments and improve your grades, use our case study at Native Assignment Help. Our team of proficient assignment help experts is knowledgeable and experienced enough to produce outstanding papers that meet academic standards. Thus, come together with us at Native Assignment Help for sure success in everything.
Task 1
Literature survey of the different aspects
Earthquakes are nothing but naturally occurring disasters which can pose a very serious threat to the concerned built environment. So, it becomes extremely necessary to comprehensively design the buildings which have the capability to withstand the seismic activity for minimizing the total loss of the lives as well as properties (Crowley et al. 2021). The aspect of seismic design regarding the buildings includes the incorporation of the architectural as well as structural considerations for the creation of buildings which are strong enough for thwarting the seismic forces. The requirements of all of the occupants also need to be properly followed in this regard. The structural requirements incorporate the assurance of the fact that the concerned building has an adequate strength, greater ductility, and can remain as a single integral unit respectively. The aforementioned criteria’s needs to remain properly in place even while the building is subject to very high ground motions in general.
When the architectural requirements are concerned, it essentially includes the designing of the building for lowering the risk pertaining to the flying debris. Moreover, the factors such as risk of fires, and the ensuring of the availability of the proper escape routes in any event of earthquakes also need to be taken into consideration. This also includes the designing of the buildings having sufficient stiffness, regularity as well as mass for that matter. The parameter known as “adequate stiffness” is very crucial for the controlling of the lateral displacement, as the adequate mass is crucial in resisting the lateral forces respectively. The regularity in the designing of the building is very important for ensuring that the concerned building does not experience torsion. The recognition of the potential risks which can have an impact on the structure is another key part of the entire domain of seismic design. These risks comprise floods, landslides, as well as soil liquefaction respectively.
Methods and Design Codes Requirements
Several design codes offer guidelines as well as procedures for the seismic planning of the buildings. The "International Building Regulation" which establishes minimum standards for the seismic design of the buildings is one such regulation. Considering the seismic danger of the area the "IBC" necessitates that the concerned structures be designed for a specific level of ground motion (Roslan et al. 2021). This particular rule also mandates that a specific level of ductility be properly built into buildings. The methods for the calculation of the seismic forces upon the buildings are provided by the "ASCE 7" standard. This specific standard takes into account a number of factors that includes the building of the specifications, conditions regarding the soil, as well as ground motion characteristics.
Different structural systems that can be used to make a building earthquake resistant.
A popular technique for the objective of examining the behaviour of the structural systems which are subject to load is known as "beam theory". With respect to this particular theory, the beam needs to be deformable, straight, and made of an isotropic as well as homogeneous material. It also requires that shear forces along with the bending moments inside the beam fluctuate linearly throughout its length. Moreover, the loads applied to the beam are also transmitted through its cross-section. As it offers a quick as well as easy approach to ascertain the stresses and underlying forces in a beam, the beam theory has the advantage of being simple and easy to utilize. This hypothesis does have certain limits particularly when it comes to more intricate structures which fail to behave like perfect beams. The other approaches for analysing structures that are frequently utilized include flexibility as well as moment distribution methods. These techniques are appropriate for the structures with complex cross-sections or many supports which are not susceptible to simple beam analysis
The "moment distribution" approach utilizes iterative computations for the purpose of determining the manner in which the internal forces are distributed within a structure. It is essentially predicated upon the premise that as a load is applied a member's stiffness increases. In respect of this approach the structure is normally divided into sections and the overall distribution of the internal forces is estimated in the first place. Furthermore, the solution is then constantly improved until the equilibrium has been achieved. While having both benefits and drawbacks the flexibility as well as moment distribution approaches are more adaptable than the "beam theory" and may be used with a wider variety of constructions (Lagos et al. 2021). The “Truss” systems can be utilized to calculate the stresses generated by applied loading on the system's structure and its constituent parts. The straight members with joints on their ends compose the truss system's components. Whenever loads are applied to the truss system the members tend to function either in compression or tension in general
Drawings / Sketches
Engineers can study several design options and also analyse a structure's linear and really unpredictable behaviour. Numerous forms of nonlinearity, such as P-delta inquiry, tension/compression components et allows, cables, and hinges constructed of plastic, to mention a few, may be readily and effectively analysed using this program (Nuzzo et al. 2019). Market-leading tools for the dynamics analysis of structures are offered by AutoCAD Robots Structural Analysis professional reasons and high-level rapid dynamics solvers facilitate that time-consuming analysis can be done fast for any size of construction.
Figure 1: Seismic analysis code and load combination
Even partial ignorance or contempt of the quake rules of the building regulations could contribute to a deficient structure. The retrofitting expenditures less the extra expenses that could have been invested to ensure the building's earthquake resistance during its development and building stage are some examples of the value reduction that may apply.
Figure 2: Shear force and bending moment analysis
During the event of an earthquake, the designers may be mutually and jointly responsible with those who own the building for any associated material damage plus for any retrofitting expenditures. In most cases, a retrofit becomes far more expensive than it would have been to create a contemporary building having suitable earthquake protection. Disruptions may also result in substantial expenses.
Figure 3: Seismic analysis Building plan
Different Structural Systems
An earthquake-resistant building can be constructed with an array of structural systems. The "moment-resisting frame" system is one such system in general (Thiers-Moggia et al. 2021). In respect of the aforementioned system, the structure is constructed to be resistive to lateral forces. This in turn takes place by way of the stiff frames which can verily withstand the bending moments. Another approach is the "shear wall system" for that matter. This system essentially mandates the utilization of the vertical walls which can withstand shear forces for the creation of a structure that can resist lateral stresses.
The "shear walls" refers to the vertical walls which render lateral support over the horizontal stresses generated by seismic activity. This is another essential structural need in this context (Bai et al. 2020). These walls that are usually stonework or reinforced concrete are positioned strategically around the structure to boost its stability in particular. Furthermore, the seismic design takes into account a number of architectural factors that can mitigate the effects of seismic disasters. To minimize the surface area that is subjected to seismic stresses the developers can implement creative forms like tapering or setback constructions. The building's total weight can be decreased and its resilience to seismic activity can also be increased by integrating lightweight materials like glass and aluminium.
The "seismic design" of the buildings has been improved significantly as a result of technological breakthroughs. A concrete instance is the use of computer modelling and simulation technologies which enables engineers as well as architects to test various design hypotheses and assess how effectively they can operate in various earthquake situations.
These instruments can be useful in identifying the possible flaws in the structural elements of a building and also allow planners to create strong remedies to address them. The creation of the new materials, such as "fiber-reinforced" polymers that have great tensile strength and flexibility also has a significant impact upon the seismic design (Filiatrault et al. 2021). For the sole objective of strengthening the current structures and increasing their durability against seismic activity the "FRPs" are becoming more prevalent in seismic reinforcement projects.
Case Study
The “Taipei 101” building situated in “Taiwan” is a proper example of a particular building that has been designed for the purpose of withstanding the earthquakes. This building has been designed with the “Tuned Mass Damper” system. It has been utilized for the reduction of the lateral displacement pertaining to this building. The “TMD” system comprises a very large mass which gets suspended from this building’s roof and can also move with respect to the lateral forces. This particular building has also been designed with the combination of “braced frame systems” as well as “MRF”. Furthermore, the “Petronas Towers” located in Malaysia” is another example regarding the buildings which have the potential to properly withstand the earthquakes. Both the “shear wall systems”, and “MRF” have also been utilized for the aforementioned building in this regard.
However, the cost necessary for ensuring acceptable seismic resistance may be significantly affected by what approach is chosen during the phase of conceptual design and by the appropriate design method: Early communication with the architects and a civil engineer is essential for the first conceptual design phase
Figure 4: Column and beam elevation
When contrasted with the past, a structure's ability to withstand damage during an earthquake is significantly better, lowering the overall cost of earthquake defines and thus diminishing vulnerability (Habte, 2021). The associated ductile concepts may require special care.
Figure 5: Beam and column properties
Figure 6: Model of RCC building
Many catastrophes during earthquakes can be due to the fact that the ground level lacks the bracing features, such as walls, that are found in the higher floors and is instead held up by columns (Habte, 2021). As a result, a ground floor with a soft story (soft in the horizontal axis) is created. Supporting cyclic engines with displacements between the shifting earth and the top section of the building frequently lead to harm to the columns. A hazardous sway mechanism (storey process) with an elevated amount of the deformations in plastic at each of the column ends is triggered by the aluminium bends (plastic joints) at the top and the bottom of the columns (Nuzzo et al. 2019).
During earthquakes, asymmetric reinforcing is frequently to blame for structural failures. Only the rear bracing elements (walls and trusses) are shown in the two drawings ahead. Because the columns' ability to resist upward stresses and displacements is minimal, they are not illustrated. However, the skeletons of the structure, which are required to support gravity loads, should be able to move per the structure's horizontal displacements without losing their ability to support loads (Habte, 2021).
Blended structural systems having structural masonry walls and steel or concrete columns respond very negatively to earthquakes. The frames that the columns create when coupled with the paving stones or beams have a far lower horizontal rigidity than the mortar that composes walls. Consequently, masonry structures carry a significant portion of the impact of seismic events.
Floating Foundation
The rising or hovering foundation divides a building's superstructure from its foundation.
A building may be raised beyond its base utilizing lead-rubber bearings, which are made out of an all-lead core wrapped in alternative layers of elastic and steel. The sheets of steel are used to join the bearings to the structure's base and to the structure itself. Thus, the floating ground can shift during a seismic event without troubling the structure.
Shock Absorption
Buildings utilize this kind of equipment in an approach that is similar to how shock absorbers are used in an automobile. Buildings benefit from earthquake-resistant tech through the way their vibrating vibrations slow down and diminish in intensity.
Symmetry, Diaphragms, And Cross-Bracing
Symmetry is often one standard for earthquake designs. Asymmetrical designs carry a higher seismic risk. Although split-level, L-shaped, and T-shaped buildings are more pleasing to the eye, they are also more susceptible to torsion. Therefore, designers and engineers create symmetrical structures to maintain a symmetrical distribution of stresses throughout the building and to minimize aesthetic features like cornices and cantilever projections (Nuzzo et al. 2019).
Task 2
Force in each member
The responses at the supports are equal and opposing if the truss construction is symmetric and supported at both ends. The response force is denoted by R.
The overall tension action the member is calculated at 45 kn.
Forces in the members
In order to ascertain the internal forces in its members, an inverted truss construction with a 36 m span and loads of 90 kN, 90 kN, and 75 kN must be analysed. The member forces may be calculated using the joints approach.
Consequently, the forces in the truss structure's leftmost components are “Fleft, Ftop, Fright, Fleft” respectively.
The beam's full length is subjected to the UDL of 25 kN/m.
Right-hand section next to the point load:
A point load of 150 N is applied at x = 10 m.
The beam's full length is subjected to the UDL of 25 kN/m.
From the earlier part, we are aware of the responses R1 and R2.
The shear force and bending moment equations' negative signs denote that the forces and moments are operating in the inverse of the x-axis's positive direction.
(b)
The shear force and bending moment equations' negative signs denote that the forces and moments are operating in the inverse of the x-axis's positive direction. Suppose the beam is 6 meters long and the concentrated load of 12 ken is applied 3 meters away from the left support. As a result, a = 3 m.
Therefore, at x = 4 meters, the shear force is 27 kN and the bending moment is 15.5 kN.m.
SFD and BMD
In order ascertain the internal forces in the beam, an analysis of a simply supported beam with a span of 24 m and a uniformly distributed load of 15 kN/m is required. The shear force and bending moment at any point along the beam may be determined using the method of sections.
In order to design and analyses the beam for strength and deflection, as well as to make sure that it can carry the imposed load safely, these numbers can be employed.
Use Native Assignment Help to make your engineering dreams come true! Our skilled writers are specialised in delivering high-quality engineering assignment that are accurate, well-researched, and tailored to satisfy your educational objectives. We have you in mind regarding civil, mechanical, electrical, or any other engineering field!
References
Amiri, H.A., Najafabadi, E.P., Estekanchi, H.E. and Ozbakkaloglu, T., 2020. Performance-based seismic design and assessment of low-rise steel special moment resisting frames with block slit dampers using endurance time method. Engineering Structures, 224, p.110955.
Bai, J., Chen, H., Jia, J., Sun, B. and Jin, S., 2020. New lateral load distribution pattern for seismic design of deteriorating shear buildings considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 139, p.106344.
Bakarman, S.N., 2019. STRUCTURAL STEEL ANALYSIS DESIGN OF COMMERCIAL FACTORIES FOR LOADING AND EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE. Neutron, 19(1), pp.51-63.
Bedon, C., Amadio, C. and Noé, S., 2019. Safety issues in the seismic design of secondary frameless glass structures. Safety, 5(4), p.80.
Crowley, H., Despotaki, V., Silva, V., Dabbeek, J., Romão, X., Pereira, N., Castro, J.M., Daniell, J., Veliu, E., Bilgin, H. and Adam, C., 2021. Model of seismic design lateral force levels for the existing reinforced concrete European building stock. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19, pp.2839-2865.
Filiatrault, A., Perrone, D., Merino, R.J. and Calvi, G.M., 2021. Performance-based seismic design of nonstructural building elements. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 25(2), pp.237-269.
Habte, D., 2021. Structural analysis of high-rise building using ETABS and RSA software. ???????????? ???????? ?????????? ??????????? ? ??????????, 17(2), pp.133-139.
Hentri, M., Hemsas, M. and Nedjar, D., 2021. Vulnerability of asymmetric multi-storey buildings in the context of performance-based seismic design. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 25(5), pp.813-834.
Kaveh, A., Mottaghi, L. and Izadifard, R.A., 2021. An integrated method for sustainable performance-based optimal seismic design of RC frames with non-prismatic beams. Scientia Iranica, 28(5), pp.2596-2612.
Lagos, R., Lafontaine, M., Bonelli, P., Boroschek, R., Guendelman, T., Massone, L.M., Saragoni, R., Rojas, F. and Yañez, F., 2021. The quest for resilience: The Chilean practice of seismic design for reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 37(1), pp.26-45.
Merino, R.J., Perrone, D. and Filiatrault, A., 2020. Consistent floor response spectra for performance?based seismic design of nonstructural elements. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 49(3), pp.261-284.
Nabid, N., Hajirasouliha, I. and Petkovski, M., 2019. Adaptive low computational cost optimisation method for Performance-based seismic design of friction dampers. Engineering Structures, 198, p.109549.
Nuzzo, I., Losanno, D. and Caterino, N., 2019. Seismic design and retrofit of frame structures with hysteretic dampers: a simplified displacement-based procedure. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 17, pp.2787-2819.
O'Reilly, G.J. and Calvi, G.M., 2019. Conceptual seismic design in performance?based earthquake engineering. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 48(4), pp.389-411.
Roslan, H.A., Adiyanto, M.I., Harith, N.S.H., Faisal, A. and Razak, S.M.S.A., 2021, February. Impact of seismic design on cost of structural materials for two storey hostel building in Sabah. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 682, No. 1, p. 012024). IOP Publishing.
Thiers-Moggia, R. and Málaga-Chuquitaype, C., 2021. Performance-based seismic design and assessment of rocking timber buildings equipped with inerters. Engineering Structures, 248, p.113164.
Share this
Cite This Work
Go Through the Best and FREE Case Studies Written by Our Academic Experts!
