Introduction - Labov’s Study and Sociolinguistic Research Methods
In this study appraisal of sociolinguistics in the English language will be described. Sociolinguistics study shows various social contexts and specific functions of English to convey the aspects properly. The sociolinguistic study is further divided into two sects such as interactions and variations. The learners can learn the appropriate ways to speak English fluently and write the language by following all the rules. Labov’s Vineyard study presents a synchronic analysis of centralization or fronting the issues with diphthongs to correlate the germinal comparison of sociolinguistic issues. Labov's study raised the perspective and elemental change of diphthongs to identify the social factors. The study will further help to reconstruct the ideological changes and various factors to be analyzed saliently. The basic purpose is to express informative purposes of language in direct ways. According to D'Onofrio (2020), ideological linguistic variation performs to describes ways in which to speaker explicitly gives constructive ideas about several linguistic variations, styles, contextual categories, and perceptions about processing and representing structural patterns at an interactional level.
Grab The Best Academic Assistance In Just One Click
The aim of the study is to use the English language effectively and reciprocate with the social organization through the correct interpretation of English contextually.
Objectives
To observe different aspects of the linguistic system.
Labov's study functions in sociology to practice culture as a crucial and concerning role tool for developing human assessment.
To evaluate the constitutional procedures of the sociolinguistic study and the explained study method of Labov
To explore innovative ways for distilling values and linguistic competence.
Research Question
1) What are the observed aspects of differentiating several systems in sociolinguistics?
2) What are the revealed functions of Labov's study as a concerning tool?
3) How do constitutional procedures of sociolinguistic study help in defining the method of Labov?
4) What are the distilled innovative ways to value linguistic competence?
Methodology
Introduction
The methodology is a necessary part of conducting the study further on Labov's linguistic study. The study initially reflects the analytical advantages and disadvantages of the perspective of the sociolinguistic study of Labov. The study aims to evaluate the approach consideration of linguistic variables to create further literacy and linguistic sensibility within the learners. According to Siregar (2021), sociolinguistic science seeks ways to express the values of language in life. Furthermore, the study is prepared to gain sociolinguistic knowledge and understanding of the different aspects of language in the world. The study is based on primary data analysis which is purely empirical and evaluates the approach consideration of linguistic variables.
Research Philosophy
Research philosophy is systematic through the structure to obtain new reliable knowledge by formulation of research choice, processing, and analysis. According to Tamminen and Poucher (2020), the execution of methodological research visualizes attributed phenomena to construct the predominant philosophical position of the research. Basically, there are three types of research philosophies used in a research field and all these philosophies can be used to state different reasons according to different needs and objectives that will be chosen in the research. In this study, positivism research philosophy will be chosen to process different factors and ideas of the learners and help them to relate with existing studies. According toAlharahsheh and Pius (2020), positivist research enables engagement and classroom practice to stance social leads and general regularities to explain the study further. Positivism research philosophy will support the sociolinguistic study effectively and discuss the factors and approached data by the learners.
The research approach is another crucial part of conducting any research for supporting the data collected by the learners effectively and helping further to provide support to the research terms for evaluating the overall aim of the study. According to Mehra and Zangeneh (2019), research methodology approaches the assumed critical factors in the research work to endeavor distinguishable purposes of the research factors. Furthermore, two research approaches are followed to conduct research and such as inductive and deductive. Conducting this study is required following an inductive research approach to explore new updated information. According to Walter and Ophir (2019), the inductive research approach uses computational farms to emphasize and measure organizational topic networks. The learners to define facts and hypotheses considerably will base the analysis of the assigned study on innovative research work.
Research Design
Research design is systematically crucial to learners to meet the aim and objectives of the study by following the proper framework. The total framework of the sociolinguistic study is based on an appropriate approach and philosophy to be selectively for framing the research design. According to Bloomfield and Fisher (2019), learners are required to consider the conceptual descriptive design to identify any flaws within the study and find any interference further to report the implementation of the research structure. Generally, three types of design are followed such as exploratory, explanatory, and descriptive. Out of three research designs, the descriptive design will be followed in the study to support the factual viewpoints and supportive analysis perspective of sociolinguistic variables.
Research Strategy
The research strategy conducts the objectives of the study strategically to guide the methodological target of the research in the proper direction. According to Ziegler et al. (2021), explicit sociolinguistic enterprises originally represented the transmission of acquisition-based language change. The qualitative research method ensures to identification research gap and data collection to refill the research properly. Research strategy can be developed by following different experiments, questionnaires, and tarn scripts to follow the secondary qualitative data analysis. It is further suggested that authentic data collection will be done to conduct the research further.
Hypotheses
H0: The linguistic system observes analytical values in the linguistic system.
H1: Linguistics seeks evaluation to consider the aspect of Labov to understand the perspective of sociolinguistic usage.
H0:Labov's study cannot be recognized as a concerning tool in the sociolinguistic aspect.
H2: Labov's study is the most used practice culture to develop the human assessment.
H0: Labov's study method cannot be taken as one of the constitutional procedures.
H3: Labov's study method is one of the crucial constitutional procedures to evaluate sociolinguistic considerations.
H0: Sociolinguistics is not able to explore distilled values and linguistic competence
H4: Sociolinguistics explores Labov's study to value innovative competence.
Data collection
Generally, researchers to conduct the study further can use two types of data sources. These two types of data sources are qualitative and quantitative. Primary data sources further support the effectiveness of conducting the study. According to Alsoraihi (2021), specific assortment demonstrates a hypothesis to consider the essential presumption of literary properties to present different degrees of sociolinguistic etymology. Primary data analysis will be more effective in helping the researcher meet the research objective and do a thematic analysis. This primary quantitative data will use a survey of 51 persons and 10 questions to conduct a further research analysis. Majorly crucial parts of collecting data while doing primary quantitative analysis are Likert scale questions, open-ended and yes-no questions will be genuine, authentic, and highlight the latest sources. Primary quantitative data will help the researchers to select 10 important questions successfully to conduct the research.
Data analysis
The researchers will be required to follow the proper demonstration of the study to review primary quantitative data analysis. According to Bodó et al. (2022), sociolinguistic participation involves the engagement and participation of learners thoroughly to elaborate scrutinize, and considerable language expertise properly. In this research, the primary data collection method will be used and for this, the researcher will use the factors related to a survey among 51 people. Therefore, 10 questions will be prepared and the research will use Excel to analyze the data set. Therefore, after performing the data coding in Excel and after that, the SPSS tool will be used to test the hypothesis. After considering the topic, questions will be made based on the research objectives and research questions. Furthermore, the aspects related to data coding will be followed and it will use descriptive analysis, Anova analysis, regression, and coefficient analysis to conduct the findings chapter. Therefore, it is also needed for the research to test the hypothesis by using the above-mentioned tools. Moreover, the research will focus on the independent and independent variables to test the validity and reliability of the data set and to test the mentioned hypothesis.
Details of recruit participants
Recruited participants in this study will require 51 people. This technique will satisfy the aim and objective of the sociolinguistic study and deliver adequate information related to the study. Random data sampling research will represent unbiased sources and equal probability. Furthermore, random sampling is the most convenient method to experiment on the gathered data statistically. According to Uwen et al. (2020), globalization and multiple trending practices in the domain of the English language retrieved data responses indigenously. However, random data sampling represents an unbiased opinion of the selected participants and develops the quality of the research by further satisfying the aim and objective of the study. Random sampling derives consideration and assumption of these selected 51 participants to receive suitable answers for specific criteria.
References
Alharahsheh, H.H. and Pius, A., 2020. A review of key paradigms: Positivism VS interpretivism.Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences,2(3), pp.39-43. https://gajrc.com/gajhss
Alsoraihi, M.H., 2021. Linguistic Variation From The Scope Of Sociolinguistics: A Review Article.Multicultural Education,7(6).
Bloomfield, J. and Fisher, M.J., 2019. Quantitative research design.Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association,22(2), pp.27-30. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.738299924514584
Bodó, C., Barabás, B., Fazakas, N., Gáspár, J., Jani?Demetriou, B., Laihonen, P., Lajos, V. and Szabó, G., 2022. Participation in sociolinguistic research.Language and Linguistics Compass,16(4), p.e12451. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12451
D'Onofrio, A., 2020. Personae in sociolinguistic variation.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science,11(6), p.e1543. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1543
Mehrad, A. and Zangeneh, M.H.T., 2019. Comparison between qualitative and quantitative research approaches: Social sciences. International Journal For Research In Educational Studies, Iran, pp.1-7. https://gnpublication.org/index.php/es/article/view/998/783
Siregar, I., 2021. Epistemological Challenges Against Sociolinguistics.International Journal of Linguistics Studies,1(2), pp.37-42. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijls.2021.1.2.6
Tamminen, K.A. and Poucher, Z.A., 2020. Research philosophies. The Routledge International Encyclopedia of Sport and Exercise Psychology (pp. 535-549). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315187259-39/research-philosophies-katherine-tamminen-zo%C3%AB-poucher
Uwen, G.S.O., Bassey, V.O. and Nta, E.G., 2020. Emerging Sociolinguistic Teaching Trends of English as a First Language in Nigeria.International Journal of Language Education,4(3), pp.398-407. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1286108
Walter, D. and Ophir, Y., 2019. News frame analysis: An inductive mixed-method computational approach.Communication Methods and Measures,13(4), pp.248-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1639145
Ziegler, A., Edler, S. and Oberdorfer, G. eds., 2021. Urban matters: Current approaches in variationist sociolinguistics.
