Systematic Literature Review of Ancient DNA Assignment Sample

Chapter 1: Introduction

1.1 Introduction - Key Steps for Content Evaluation

This research study was about the systemic review of the ancient DNA extraction methods that might be present. For DNA sequencing the ‘Sanger sequencing’ method is used. Which could be used by researchers in modern times to extract DNA for their analysis. The reliability of those ancient methods in the study of modern genetics will also be analyzed. In this section, the background, aim and objectives, research questions, and the rationale and significance of the research were discussed. Also, an overall framework of the research has been provided.

Looking for top-notch assignment help? Get Online Assignment Help UK Across All Cities with Native Assignment Help. Our expert tutors are ready to assist with your academic needs, whether you're in London, Manchester, Birmingham, or anywhere else in the UK.

1.2 Background

The extraction and sequencing of DNA has become an important part of modern genetics study. In today’s era, techniques like the physical disruption of the host cell by crushing or cell wall disruption using chemicals were commonly used. These methods are designed in such a manner that would increase the yield of DNA after the PCR process. For DNA sequencing the ‘Sanger sequencing’ method was used (Shu, et al. 2020). But, nowadays, next-generation sequencing methods are also used by researchers. However, there are very few studies present that analyses the impact of using those during the DNA extraction from bones, fossils, or other ancient materials from caves. And, this needs more investigation. So, this research study would help the researchers to understand the impact of modern-day DNA extraction techniques and methods on ancient DNA during extraction. Which could be both positive and negative. Also, the reliability and comparative efficacy of Genetic Studies from those ancient materials can be understood. This would help the researchers to also use the data and results during the conduction of future research (Capo, et al. 2021). And, also whether those methods are reliable for future use or not. Methods like agarose gel electrophoresis, PCR analysis, and Sanger sequencing methods among others were used in modern-day genetics and analysis which should be measured, and compared regarding the extraction of ancient DNA materials.

1.3 Research Aim

The study aims to analyses the various DNA extraction and sequencing methods present regarding DNA extraction from ancient materials and complete a reliability and comparative efficacy analysis.

1.4 Research Objectives

The objectives of the study are given below.

1. To analyze the impact of modern-day DNA extraction techniques on ancient DNA extraction.
2. To compare the various extraction methods available.
3. To measure the reliability of these methods regarding the extraction of ancient DNA.
4. To compare the efficacy of these technologies during genetic studies.

1.5 Research Questions

The research questions that should be asked in this study are given below.

1. What is the impact of modern-day DNA extraction methods on ancient samples?
2. How the extraction methods are available compared regarding DNA extraction of ancient samples?
3. Are those methods used currently reliable for the extraction of ancient DNA?
4. Are these modern-day extraction methods effective enough regarding the extraction of ancient DNA samples?

1.6 Research Rationale

Research is important in several aspects. There are very few studies present which had analyzed the impact of modern-day DNA isolation, extraction and sequencing techniques on ancient materials. This study would help the researchers to evaluate and understand the impact, positive or negative, on the success of ancient DNA extraction (Buoy, et al. 2021). As, in the case of ancient DNA materials, the samples had to be handled carefully before them being subjected to chemical or other additional nucleotides for further analysis. And, the chances of success regarding the successful DNA extraction in an accurate form could not be confirmed easily. Bovine serum albumin is used for the analysis of the performance of PCR amplification. Which is already a biological product, the success or failure as a result of damage to the DNA could not be ruled out (Drieu, et al. 2020). Thus, a comprehensive analytical study or review is important for the measurement of the reliability and comparative efficacy of those methods.

1.7 Research Significance

The significance of the research could be understood from the fact that there are very few studies being carried out in the past that compared the various modern-day DNA extraction methods. With the other methods available regarding the extraction and isolation of DNA and other genetic materials from the ancient samples (Jones, 2021). In general, for the extraction of DNA, gel electrophoresis, along with PCR amplification analysis was carried out. But, carrying out the extraction of genetic materials from ancient samples is difficult, as the DNA samples had to be carefully handled due to their delicate nature. And, also they were present in a small amount that could get destroyed as a result of the rough handling of those samples (Armbrecht, et al. 2019). So, the study would help future researchers to take a cue from the result of this analysis regarding the extraction of genetic materials from the ancient samples.

1.8 Research Framework

The research framework is given in the figure below.

Figure 1: Research Framework

1.9 Conclusion

In conclusion, it can be said that the study was about the systemic review of various pieces of literature published on the subject of DNA material extraction and isolation from ancient samples. Although there are not many pieces of literature were published on the said subject, this study would help to compare the various available modern-day genetic material isolation processes with that of other technologies regarding the isolation of DNA from ancient materials. This study would also help to test the reliability and comparative efficacy of those methods.

Chapter 2: Literature Review

2.1 Introduction

The study was about the systemic review of the different literature published previously about the isolation and extraction of DNA. From the ancient materials and fossils. And, whether the use of modern and available technologies for isolation, sequencing and extraction of DNA was validated or not. Also, whether there are any ancient methods present that could be used for the isolation and extraction of DNA from such materials. In today's era, processes like The Sanger Sequencing method, and ‘PCR methods’ are widely used by scientists to carry out the isolation of DNA. As the genetic materials present inside the fossils stored for millions of years were vulnerable, the handling of such materials was also essential and critical. In this chapter, different previously published studies that were linked to the subject of the use of modern technologies for the isolation of DNA and other materials of scientific interest were discussed. This would help the researchers associated with the study to develop a comprehensive understanding of the importance of modern genetic technologies for isolating fossiled DNA. Also, the importance of fossils regarding the preservation of genetic materials.

2.2 Empirical Study

According to the author, Orlando, (2021), the earliest ancient DNA molecules were discovered well over thirty years ago, and high-throughput sequencing was necessary to characterize the first ancient nuclear genomes. Thousands of ancient archaeological artefacts have now produced genome-scale data, and the volume of ancient biological tissues accessible to genome sequencing is increasing constantly. Prehistoric DNA fragments are usually very small molecules that have a significant amount of post-mortem chemical damage. To evaluate designs of genetic variation from historical populations, individuals, and species precise experimental dry-laboratory and wet-laboratory procedures are needed for their manipulation, extraction, and validation. Numerous issues in evolutionary biology, the environmental and archaeological sciences, and anthropology are managed by ancient DNA data (Orlando, 2021). These results have changed the perception of multiple but significant prehistoric and historic events and revealed a far more dynamic past than previously thought. This primer shows the variety of applications that arise from ancient DNA analysis and gives an introduction to the ideas and cutting-edge techniques that underpin it. The study also highlights the necessity of fully including stakeholders and archaeologists in the design and analytical process and design of the research, tackles certain ethical issues relating to the irreplaceable material’s destructive analysis, and explores potential future directions.

Figure 2: DNA Extraction classification

According to the author, Scarsbrook, (2023), the study of ancient DNA continues to transform because of advancements in methodology and technology. Future investigations and small or fragmentary subfossil remnants are disproportionately affected by the majority of ancient DNA extraction technologies, which necessitate the complete and partial demolition of museum models present in finite form. The study provides details about an ancient DNA extraction technique tailored for the remains of smaller vertebrates that causes the least amount of damage. The researchers used this technique to identify the genetic diversity of the lost mainland animals in the vast genus of New Zealand diplodactylid geckos, Hoplodactylus, which is currently limited to sanctuaries on the mainland and islands free of predators (Scarsbrook, 2023). With the help of 19 modern, 6 historical/archival, 16 Holocene Hoplodactylus duvaucelii sensu latu samples, 6 historical/archival, and 1 modern Woodworthia sp. sample, the researchers concluded in the report the first mitochondrial genomes for diplodactylid geckos found in New Zealand. Detailed structural analysis of phylogeographical present inside Hoplodactylus spp. revealed the effects of ‘Late Cenozoic biogeographical obstacles’, such as changes in the extent and suitableness of eustatic sea-level change, glacial refugee, and the opening and closing of Pliocene maritime straits. These signals were hidden from the current tissue-derived data by the recent continental extinction. These findings demonstrate the value of least disruptive DNA extraction for both the preservation of natural history collections and genomic investigations of small vertebrate taxa that have received less attention.

Figure 3: Graphical representation of Allele frequency

According to the author, Dehasque, et al. (2020), Genomics variability patterns within live populations or species can be used to implicitly deduce evolutionary processes, including selection. However, this can lead to the making of incorrect predictions about ancestral demography and selective regimes. Because data that constitute of time series allow for the direct assessment of inhabitants’ parameters that were collected during, after, and before the genetic changes induced by selection. Sequencing of ancient DNA from historically separated samples can provide information on the past selection processes. In this study, the researchers highlight some of the recent developments that evolutionary biologists have not yet widely adopted (Dehasque, et al. 2020). Also, they argue for the consolidation of ‘temporal sampling’ and the creation of paleo genomic datasets in the field of evolutionary biology. The researchers also discussed how the methods of genome sequencing improve the interpretation of the timing and pace of genomic alteration that is driven by selection. Also, the expected signatures of purifying, positive selection, and balancing in time series data. However, the researchers were aware of the limitations of such data, as the data was low in sample size, fragmented, and subject to examination damage. Hence, the researchers draw attention to the various presumptions and factors involved in the analysis of 'paleo genomic data' as well as the presumptions about analytical techniques.

According to the author, Jiao, et al. (2020), one of the most promising methods for identifying wood at the species level is DNA barcoding technology, which helps with both the preservation of forestry supplies and the tracking of the timber trade. This study examines the advancements, difficulties, and current issues in the last 10 years in the development of DNA barcoding for wood identification. The compilation of a wood DNA reference database, particularly regarding the maintenance of important taxa, the comparison and comprehensive utilization of sequence analytical methods would help to accomplish accurate designation, the optimization of DNA extraction methods for processed or ancient wood (Jiao, et al. 2020). The approach of examining high-resolution DNA barcodes that are suitable for wood identification was also prioritized. The possibility of alternative genetic tools for wood identification is also explored alongside DNA barcoding by the researchers. Furthermore, a plan for future wood DNA barcoding research is presented through the research. The study suggests that the integration of wood DNA barcoding with other techniques, such as wood anatomy, can provide an alternative perspective and an effective way of advancing legal logging in the timber trade. Which would also help in protecting biodiversity worldwide.

According to the author, Murcia, et al. (2021), in cases where there is a complete absence of remaining tissues, sedimentary ancient DNA, or sedan, is a reliable bimolecular proxy for tracing taxon occurrence over time in a local environment. It is believed that sedan survives by being bonded to different minerals, which helps with long-term 'bimolecular preservation', but complicates DNA isolation. The persistence of other chemicals that impede enzyme-associated processes and the loss of genuine sedan when trying to eliminate inhibitor co-elution are two prominent constraints in 'sedan' extraction. Here, the researchers had provided a targeted enrichment technique combined with 'sedan' extraction which intended to optimize DNA recovery (Murcia, et al. 2021). In comparison to a commercial soil extraction kit, the method followed by the researchers shows a 7.7–19.3x increase in on-target plant and animal ‘sedan’ and a 1.2–59.9x increase compared to a met barcoding strategy. The research also provides findings regarding the diachronic presence of plants and animals from permafrost samples of Yukon after ‘carbon-dating’ and the ‘Pleistocene-Holocene transition’. The result of the study also discussed new possible proof for the late survival (~9700 years ago) of mammoth (Mammuthus sp.) and horse (Equus sp.) in the Klondike region of Yukon, Canada''. This would help the researchers to demonstrate the efficacy of the cold spin extraction and PalaeoChip capture enrichment methods. The research concluded that greater 'on-target sequencing' and a more scientifically varied dataset are the results of this enrichment strategy.

According to the author, Irving-Pease, et al. (2021), Substantial studies related to the genetic association data from national biobanks have provided new avenues for researching the genetic development of multifaceted human traits and disorders. In contrast, genomes from prehistoric 'human archaeological remains' are now more accessible than ever before and offer a clear insight into historical shifts in the frequency of trait-associated genes associated with traits. This resulted in a spike of studies that seek to use historical DNA to analyze the genetic component of traits from historical and ancient times to identify whether all of these features were influenced by natural selection (Irving-Pease, et al. 2021). But when it comes to humans, concerns regarding the robustness and portability of complex trait inference across demographics are particularly important when making judgments about people who died thousands of years ago. In this study, the researchers deal with the benefits of using ancient genomes in those studies that relied on the different variants of a trait. They also concluded that the need for models that can more effectively integrate ancient genomes into quantitative genetic frameworks was necessary.

Figure 4: Measures of DNA extraction

According to the author, Capo, et al. (2021), Paleoecological research is rapidly increasing in the fields of tracking long-term shifts in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems through the use of the DNA present in the sedimentation underwater of the lakes. Even though that subject is now mostly executed, there are still information gaps, thus further research must be done to ensure the dependability of signals coming from sedimentary DNA. The researchers formulated state-of-the-art analytical procedures for efficient extraction, sampling, amplification, generation, and quantification of DNA inventories from sedimentary ancient DNA samples (sedan) using high-throughput sequencing technologies, based on the most recent pieces of literature (Capo, et al. 2021). This would help to increase the output regarding the usability of SedaDNA for the analysis of any changes in the aquatic and celestial nature of the earth. This would further help the researcher to understand the complex nature of the development of earth soil millions of years ago during the presence of ancient animals.

According to the author, Abdelmanova, et al. (2020), tracing the genetic variation of local cattle breeds across millennia can be greatly assisted through the analysis of ancient and historical DNA. The researchers had taken nine polymorphic microsatellite loci which have been genotyped on forty-nine sample species that ranged from the end of the 19th century to the first half of the 20th century. The samples represented five different cow breeds; Kholmogor, Yaroslavl, Great Russian, Novgorod, and Holland. The study identified a consensus genotype of all examined samples and loci through the use of a 'multiple-tube method'. The mean frequency of amplification mistakes, such as false alleles (FA) and allelic drop-out (ADO), was 0.79% and 2.35%, respectively. The allelic length was found to have a substantial impact on the 'ADO rate' (r2 = 0.620, p = 0.05). The study also found no discernible variations in genetic diversity between historical samples and contemporary Kholmogor and Yaroslavl groups.For the historical and modern context, the heterozygosity values were 0.726–0.774 and 0.708–0.739, respectively (Abdelmanova, et al. 2020). The allelic richness values were 2.716–2.893 and 2.661–2.758. FST and Jost's D genetic distance analyses, along with the outcomes of 'structure clustering', demonstrated that some historical components are still present in the current Kholmogor and Yaroslavl cow populations. The research thus helps to preserve the genetic resources and biodiversity of the local Russian cattle.

According to the author, Bohmann, et al. (2022), as 'met barcoding' acts on specific targets and enables parallel sequencing of genetic markers from several samples, it becomes increasingly common in basic and applied biodiversity research. This study would characterize organisms from ambient or bulk specimen samples. To achieve this, primers which were intended to target taxonomically informative marker within a taxonomic group are utilized for PCR amplification. Before sequencing begins, 'sample-specific nucleotide identifiers' are mixed with the amplicons. This mixing makes it possible to identify the DNA sequences of the actual samples. When the amplicons become available for DNA sequencing, a process known as library preparation, or met barcoding PCR, was used. During these processes, the nucleotide identifiers can be added. There are various methods for achieving this labelling. However, the use of these processes could sometimes lead to misleading results. For researchers who wish to use met barcoding for biodiversity assessments, data collection must be reliable and appropriate for the purpose it is intended for, considering the variety of issues that can be addressed using this method (Bohmann, et al. 2022). In this study, the researchers also described the three primary PCR techniques—one-step PCR, two-step PCR, and tagged PCR—for labelling the samples in a specific manner in met barcoding studies. The researchers had also compressed different important factors to take into consideration about when or when not choosing a met barcoding approach for their specific study. In conclusion, the study concluded that any further reinforcement of the power of met barcoding could be helpful in studying the variations in the biodiversity across a range of species.

According to the author, Kistler, et al. (2020), in the past thirty-five years there was an increase in the depth, subtlety, and variety of problems that could be tackled with the use of ancient biomolecules like DNA. As a result of revolution in the ancient DNA extraction technologies. These technologies are consistent and essential elements for this plant study. Researchers have examined plant domestication and dissemination, plant evolution and ecology, paleo environmental composition and dynamics, and other issues. Which were extended related fields using plant tissues from herbariums, paleontologist, and archaeological sites. In this study, the researchers look through the background of the age-old field of DNA research. Also, how plant science has contributed to its advancement and improvement. The study describes the knowledge regarding the properties of degraded DNA and the long-term preservation of plant DNA (Kistler, et al. 2020). Researchers associated with the study also go over the difficulties in recovering and analyzing ancient DNA as well as the laboratory and bioinformatics techniques employed to overcome them. Lastly, the study discusses the most recently used technologies for ancient plant genetic research.

According to the author, Yang, et al. (2020), the microbiota of the human gut had been understood better because of using the shotgun metagenomics sequencing of cells present in that area. To develop an understanding of the most accurate technology used in genetic technology, several DNA extraction techniques have been analyzed. Also, not much research has been done on the effectiveness of fungal DNA extraction. A total of six different DNA extraction protocols were followed in this research (Yang, et al. 2020). Those are Magpie Fast Stool DNA KF Kit B, Machete Nag NucleoSpin Soil Kit, Zymo Research Quick-DNA Fecal/Soil Microbe Kit, MOBIO DNeasy PowerSoil Kit, the manual non-commercial protocol MetaHIT'', and protocol Q. All the DNA samples which were extracted in manual form, showed a variation in the presence of bacterial samples. The study concluded that if during the selection of samples, they were completed in a manner that is bead-sized it could be more effective [Referred to Appendix 4].

2.3 Theories and Models

The procedure of DNA extraction methods is a very crucial study in the field of genetics which can reveal the mystery of the past genomic history, this study can enable the researcher to assist in the understanding of the analysis of the population of ancient history. Here are two models and two theories are described to present the review of the study. The two models are models of sequential extraction and preservation quality. These two frameworks help to understand the recovery of the ancient DNA. The two theories that represent this study are the temporal degradation of the genomic sequence and the inhibitor dynamics. These two theories emphasize the obstacles to changes in the integrity of the DNA.

The Sequencing Extraction Model

A methodological framework called the Sequencing Extraction Model promotes a methodical, stop-by-stop approach to the extraction of ancient DNA. A series of techniques, such as separation by force, chemical procedures, and enzymatic operations, are used in the process.

The model of the study starts with the various samples that are observed in the archaeological and paleontological settings of the extraction of DNA (Orlando et al. 2021). The differences of the situation of the preservation method and the structure include the various body parts in the extraction method. The objective of this procedure is to increase the efficiency of the recovery rate of the DNA. This type of research paper helps to signify the wide range of materials that are used in the research of DNA.

Figure 5: The sequencing extraction Model

The model of the preservation quality

The successive rate of the extraction of the DNA can be determined by the preservation of the sample (Allio et al. 2020). It recommends that examples that are better pr?s?rv?d, for instance, bonds that have been kept of the sample of DNA are bound to deliver DNA of a more excellent quality. As indicated by the model, the ?ff?ctiv?n?ss of extraction methods can vary upon how the material was pr?s?rv?d at first. This ?mphasiz?s that it is so vital to consider the techonomic and ?nvironm?ntal ?l?m?nts influencing the preceding ?xist?nc? of antiquated biological substances. By comprehending the influence of preservation quality, researchers can adjust their extraction methods to maximize DNA recovery from the preserved samples while also comprehending the potentiality of the samples [Referred to Appendix 3].

The theory of DNA Extraction pattern

Figure 6: The theory of DNA Extraction pattern

The impact of different types of alterations to the construction of DNA across time is ?xamin?d by the theory of DNA Extraction pattern. Tests against DNA exploitation instruments cause harm and fracture to the helix structure of the DNA molecule (Ide et al. 2020). For these reasons this thought proposes, given the different d?gr??s of degradation, some extraction methods may be more relevant for tests that are more established or more effective. By adopting this strategy, researchers can change their extraction techniques to address the novel challenges pr?s?nt?d by old and cleaved DNA, accordingly uncovering the hereditary information from old examples that would some way or another have been lost.

DNA Preservation Theory for Historical Samples

Figure 7: Schematic of index hopping during ExAmp clustering

Preserving DNA in samples from ancient depends on the burial ?nvironm?nt and practices. The diagenetic theory states that ?nvironm?ntal factors including humidity, t?mp?rtur?, and soil composition are important in determining whether DNA is degradd over time or pr?s?rv?d. The equilibrium of this variales is necessary for the long-term survival of anciet DNA. T?mp?ratu?s that are lower and stable soil pH, for example, are thought to d?cr?as? DNA degradaion processes, which may have an impat on the efficacy of present-day DNA extraction techniques.

use my discount

Hypothesis of Ancient Samples' DNA Damge and Healing Mechanism

The d?gr?? of dmage to DNA and the ?xist?nc? of molecular lesion that can be repaird affect how well contemporary DNA extraction techniques work on samples that date back thousands of years. Acording to the repairing and harming concept. Ancient DNA is subject to a variety of alterations throughout tie, such as cross-linking, fragmentatin, and chemical changes. In other cases, though, ?ndog?nus repair processes can still be in operation. The ability of DNA extraction techniques to remove or cop with the particular kinds of damage foud in ancient DNA d?t?rmin?s the ?xt?nt to which those techniques perfom. Selecting the right extraction techniqes involves an understanding of the type and d?gr?? of DNA damage present in ancient samples.

Bayesian Hierarchicl Developing for Comparison of Extraction Methods

Figure 8: Skeleton data examples

Several factrs, including sample age, preservation type, and ?nvironm?nt circumstances, can be considered for consideration when comparig various DNA extraction techniques for historical materials using Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling. The model might inclde information from several extraction techniques applied to historical samples, valuating the ?ff?ct of variables such as t?mp?rtur?, the composition of the soil, and the damage to DNA on the extraction process’s performnce. It is possible to update beliefs in response to now facts and incorporate past knowledge by utilizing a Bayesian framewrk. In relation to the setting of ancient samles, this model would offer an in-depth comprehension of the relative efficcy and dependability of various DNA extraction techniques.

2.4 Conceptual Framework

Figure 9: conceptual framework

This conceptual framework of this study contains different types of information regarding the dependent and independent variables of this research. The development of this section is very important because it helps in the easy identification of the entire empirical study section. The implementation of these variables was essential for the proper completion of this study. As the independent variable, the extraction methods of this practical are identified in this section and are done with the proper implementation of this practical. The fragments of the DNA, the rate of success of the transcription process, and the levels of the contaminants are identified as the dependent variables for this research study. These elements are chosen as the dependent variables because it depends on the process of the extraction process of a DNA molecule.

2.5 Literature gap

Although the study highlights how crucial it is to involve those affected and archaeologists at every step of the planning and analysis of ancient genetic data, it does not go into great detail about the precise procedures or models that make this possible. The paper briefly discusses the n??d of ?ngag?m?nt among the particles, but a more thorough examination of cooperative frameworks, possible obstacles, and ?ff?ctiv?n?ss case studies could improve our comprehension of how to incorporate many viewpoints in the field (Laporte et al. 2021). In k??ping with the last disruptive procedures, the paper also presents an antiquated DNA extraction method intended for smaller v?rt?brat?s. N?v?rth?l?ss, neither the article’s recommendations for addressing these limitations nor its thorough analysis of the wider methodological constraints of the prehistoric DNA extraction technologies present in us. A thorough analysis of the difficulties and possible ?nhanc?m?nts in different extraction methods might contribute to methodological progress. The difficulties and unique factors related to temporal sampling in pal?og?nomics are not thoroughly discussed in the paper. The review papers provide a focused ?nrichm?nt method for the extraction of ancient DNA from sediments, but they do not go into great detail about the larger challenges in doing so.

Chapter 3: Research Methodology

3.1 Introduction

This specific chapter contains different types of methods which will be used in this specific research chapter. The data collection and data analysis methods of this specific research which is the analysis of secondary data are described properly. The implementation of different research philosophies, approaches, and strategies is described properly. This section will help to guide the way of further analysis into the next sections of the study.

3.2 Research Onion

Figure 10: Research Onion

3.3 Research Method

This systematic review will utilize a secondary research methodology to ?xamin?d existing literature comparing the efficacy and reliability of different ancient DNA extraction techniques. Secondary data analysis presents a ?ffici?nt means to synthesize the present ?vid?nc? case without ?nt?ring to conduct expensive and tim?-int?nsiv? original lab research replicating prior work. The first phase will involve a compr?h?nsiv? search to identify published studies that have ?xtract?d ancient DNA using varied methods and analyzed diff?r?nc? in performance (Orlando et al, 2021). This research will cover major scholarly literature databases. Scr??ning criteria will focus on original ?xp?rim?ntal research published in the past decade that ass?ss?d ancient DNA yield, purity, fragment length, amplification success, genome coverage, or related metrics after applying different extraction protocols. Variables to be captured contain ancient sample types, are ranges, geographic sources, specific lab techniques, chemical reagents employed, quantification methods, and measurements indicating extraction performance. After Scr??ning titles, abstracts, and full texts for relevant and removal of duplicate records, the final sample of included studies will undergo coding and data extraction using a standardized template.

Structured qualitative and quantitative synthesis will summarize the current empirical findings regarding comparative efficacy across the different ancient DNA extraction approaches identified (Scarsbrook et al, 2023). The relative reliability and limitations of these methods will also be analyzed narratively. Outcomes will guide r?s?arch?rs regarding optimal ancient DNA extraction protocols to deploy for genetics and genomics investigations based on sample characteristics and study objectives. Critical appraisal and examination of ?vid?nc? quality will be performed to judge validity and aid understanding.

3.4 Research Philosophy

Figure 11: Philosophies of this study

This systematic publications review is grounded in a pragmatism research philosophy focused on the real-world applicability of the ?vid?nc? g?n?rat?d. The underlying ?pist?mology recognizes both objective and subjective factors influencing the ancient DNA extraction process and avoidance of a forced choice b?tw??n positivism and constructivism in understanding method efficacy. While procedural details and sample characteristics have impacts that can be quantitatively modelled, interpretational nuances also shape how findings on extraction performance are analyzed and contextualized across studies (Shu et al, 2020). This review adopts an ontological p?rsp?ctiv? acknowledging the complexities of biomolecule degradation in ancient specimens make strictly law-like generalizations about extraction yields challenging, but useful heuristics and principles can still be derived through comparative effectiveness research.

Contingent relationships between methods utilized and outcomes achieved are ?mphasiz?s more than universal deductive truths given the early state of ancient genomics and intrinsic variabilities in samples and techniques. This pragmatic philosophy allows balancing empirics on metrics with thoughtful context to offer practical guidance on selecting ancient DNA extraction methods for genetics studies contingent on resources available and study aims.

3.5 Research Approach

Figure 12: Research Approach

The approach that the research took is inductive as the data that has been taken from the existing data is going to be proceeded as per the need for this approach. The systematic review of the existing literature on ancient DNA extraction techniques takes a deductive approach and emphasizes the extraction and analysis of existing data by the goals of the research. This logical procedure includes combining bits of knowledge from recently distributed examinations to assess the viability and dependability of different old DNA extraction strategies for hereditary investigations. The inductive type of research approach was chosen for this research work.

A structured framework for data collection and analysis is provided by the initial step of defining the research questions and objectives. The insightful cycle permits the specialists to draw upon laid-out hypotheses and systems, directing the recognizable proof and extraction of important information from the current collection of writing (Dehasque et al, 2020). In this specific situation, the logical methodology fills in as a strategic ?stablishm?nt, guarant??ing that the examination lines up with laid-out standards and information inside the field of old DNA extraction.

The systematic organization of the data from various studies makes it possible to compare and contrast various extraction techniques. By utilizing existing information, the exploration means adding to a nuanced comprehension of the qualities and limits of these techniques. The insightful methodology works with the classification of review because of pre-determined measures, ?mpow?ring an organized combination of data. Through this logical focal point, the exploration ?xp?cts to d?t?rmin? significant bits of knowledge into the relative viability and unwavering quality of old DNA extraction techniques, giving an important asset to specialists and ?xp?rts participated in hereditary examinations including old DNA.

3.6 Research Strategy

The research on systematic literature review will undergo a method to compile and synthesize the existing evidence that compares the efficacy and reliability of different extraction techniques for recovering ancient DNA. Comprehensive searches will help to identify the relevant articles from the past decades.

The research strategy will combine terms targeting the ancient materials tested, DNA extraction protocols analyzed, genetic data yield and quality metrics ?xamin?d, and comparative efficacy focus. Targeted indexing terminology will also be utilized to capture relevant records, including controlled vocabulary descriptors and databas?-sp?cific subject headings as available in perspective platforms. R?f?r?nc? lists of highly relevant articles will undergo manual review to surface any additional appropriate studies missed in ?l?ctronic database searches. Strict criteria will isolate publications directly comparing efficacy metrics between two or more extraction techniques applied to genuine ancient DNA samples (GHR and Aithal, 2022). The final included articles will undergo coding and data extraction into a standardized template for ?vid?nc? synthesis. Outcomes sought will d?t?rmin? guidelines for selecting optimal ancient DNA extraction approaches contingent upon specimen characteristics and genetics study goals.

3.7 Data Collection Process

This research goes through a secondary data collection method to review the existing literature that shows that a mixed method will be applied which means that both the qualitative and the quantitative data will be used and referred to. Qualitative data in data combination implies non-numeric information that gives ?ncount?rs into the attributes, characteristics, and nuances of a subject. It incorporates profound discernments, sentiments, and depictions, adding to a more ?xc?ssiv? perception of quirks.

Quantitative data in data grouping incorporates numerical information, giving a quantifiable and coordinated structure for assessment. It ov?rs??s quantifiable points of view and objective estimations, offering verifiable pieces of information into models, ?xampl?s, and associations. Accumulated through procedures like investigations, assessments, or discernments, quantitative data works with an authentic examination, allowing r?s?arch?rs to arrive at truly basic inductions (Kirongo and Odoyo, 2020). It is particularly significant in spreading out associations, making ?stimat?s, and recognizing plans that add to demonstrate based power across various fields, from science and business to humanistic systems.

3.8 Research Limitation

It is ?ss?ntial to acknowledge several inherent limitations in this research, despite the promising insights that can be gathered from studying ancient DNA extraction methods. To begin, the study's success depends on the quantity and quality of w?ll-pr?s?rv?d ancient DNA samples. Archaeological ?xampl?s might change fundamentally in their protection state, acquiring fluctuation and possibly predispositions with the near examination (Murcia et al, 2021). Tainting remains an inescapable worry, as the gamble of present-day DNA invasion during extraction and resulting lab processes is trying to completely dispose of. The possibility of ?xt?rnal DNA influencing results, which would have a ?ff?ct on the reliability of the comparative efficacy assessment, n??d to be considered despite the strict contamination controls that are in place.

The study is made more complicated by the dynamic nature of DNA extraction advancements and laboratory methodological variation. The methods chosen may have an impact on comparative analysis, and the advancement of techniques may outpace the scope of the study, rendering some findings out of date (Jones and Bösl, 2021). Also, the restricted accessibility of assorted and all-around safeguarded tests, combined with moral contemplations encompassing the treatment of antiquated remains, may compel the generalizability of results to more ?xt?nsiv? populaces or verifiable periods. All in all, while the review holds important changes for hereditary examination, these recognized impediments stress the r?quir?m?nt for a careful understanding of discoveries and feature valuable open doors for future purposes in old DNA extraction strategies.

3.9 Research Ethics

This research utilizes a review synthesizing data from already published studies, it is considered low-risk from a research ethics standpoint, with no direct interaction or intervention with human subjects. However, upholding fundamentals of research integrity remains ?ss?ntial for conducting a valid and high-quality systematic review. In line with ethical systematic review practices, a protocol detailing the research question, specific objectives, inclusion criteria, search strategy, data extraction forms, and synthesis methods planned was d?v?lop?d in advance and documented before ?x?cution.

This aids in protecting against possible tampering that can turn the basic results. Most importantly, for clear and comprehensive reporting, this study follows existing PRISMA criteria (Page at al., 2021). This valuation is restricted to a study of the information that the authors of published articles were willing to provide about the procedures and results of ancient DNA extraction since it depends on secondary data. There's no chance to look into any more potentially constructed secret methods. Such reporting gaps are obvious when evaluating the limits of particular studi?is, as critical valuation clearly points out at that matter. This valuation is restricted to analyzing the information that the authors of published articles that were selected for study on ancient DNA extraction techniques and results have to offer because of its d?p?nd?nc? on secondary data. Th?r?'s no chance to look into any other hidden methods that can distort interpretations. However, critical appraisal transparently notes that such reporting gaps exist in assessing individual study limitations. In compiling and presenting the synthesized review findings, utmost care is taken to avoid misr?pr?s?nting primary data or conclusions reached by original r?s?arch?rs through inaccuracies, selective reporting, or ov?rg?n?ralization. Fair and objective representation of all included studies will ?nabl?d radars to draw their judgments on ancient DNA extraction efficacy. Any recommendations made will align with the ?vid?nc? on best practices that ?m?rg?ncy.

3.10 Research Timeline

Figure 13: Gantt chart

3.11 Conclusion

This chapter of the study gives a far-reaching outline of the literature that has been reviewed on ancient DNA extraction methods. This section features the efficacy and reliability of the various techniques used in the method of extraction. The secondary method analysis gives a methodical and organized way to study the protocols of extraction by understanding the limitations and ethics for apprehending the research.

Chapter 4: Findings and Data Analysis

4.1 Introduction

The methodical review of the literature on ancient DNA extraction techniques aimed to analyze the existing ?vid?nc? comparing the efficacy and reliability of different methods for recovering genetic material from ancient specimens. A total of studies published over the past decade let the inclusion criteria for comparative analysis of extraction protocols. The articles ?ncompass?d testing on varied ancient materials with samples ranging from years in are derived from geographic regions. Across the included studies, unique DNA extraction techniques were ?xamin?d using standardized metrics quantifying DNA yield, purity, integrity, and amplification success during subsequent genetics workflows. Both qualitative data analysis strategies were to synthesize key results regarding differential effectiveness b?tw??n the ancient DNA extraction methods under examination.

4.1 Secondary Analysis

Mapping of Ancient DNA

Figure 14: Precision alignment and two mapping quality filters

Analyzed planning devices for primitive DNA (aDNA) information, which are habitually corrupted and defiled by natural variables, were completely assessed by the authors of this paper. On reproduced and genuine aDNA datasets from different sources, including human, creature, plant, and microbial genomes, they thought about the exhibition of 14 mappers. They took a glimpse at every mapper’s sp??d, ?xactn?ss, and memory use, as well as their capacity to manage different harm ?xampl?s and infection levels (Kapp et al. 2021). They additionally investigated what read planning meant for resulting examinations like population hereditary qualities and phylog?n?tics.

The key disclosures of their survey were:

• No single mapper performed best across all circumstances and estimations. The choice of the most sensible mapper depends upon the specific credits and focuses of each aDNA project.
• A couple of mappers, for instance, BWA aln, Bowti?2, and NGM showed high accuracy and power across different datasets and hurt models, while others, such as BWA m?m, HISAT2, and SNAP, performed insufficiently on aDNA data.
• A couple of mappers, for instance, BWA aln, Bowti?2, and NGM-LR had the choice to gainfully manage long ?xamin?d (>150 bp), which are ending up being more ordinary in aDNA concentrates in light of improved sequencing progresses.
• A couple of mappers, for instance, BWA aln, Bowti?2, and NGM-LR had the choice to ?ff?ctiv?ly reduce the debasement rate by filtering through ?xamin?d that didn't match the r?f?r?nc? genome or had low arranging quality.
• The choice of the read mapper can by and large influence downstream assessments, for instance, allele repeat appraisal, people structure acceptance, and phylogenetic revamping. The makers proposed using various mappers and standing out the results from assessing the strength and constancy of the closures.

The authors summarized that the survey provides a huge resource for ?xp?rts working with aDNA data, as it offers an organized assessment of different read-arranging gadgets and their ideas for downstream examinations (Castañeda-Rico et al. 2020). They moreover suggested a couple of headings for future investigation, for instance, developing new mappers that are unequivocally planned for aDNA data or dealing with ongoing ones by combining features that can manage models and degraded levels.

Figure 15: Computerized genetic analysis

SNP-based r?f?r?nc? inclination, with th? BWA-aln and BWAm?m d?finitions having quite recently a little bundle of basically uneven t?sts, whil? th? Bowti?2 d?finitions showed moderate levels of tendency and most NovoAlign d?finitions were d?p?ndably impacted by r?f?r?nc? inclination. Intriguingly, th? SNP-based r?f?r?nc? predisposition examinations additionally showed that th? mimicked East Asian ?xampl? arrang?m?nts were mor? vulnerable to r?f?r?nc? inclination by and large. This may b? a result of th? r?f?r?nc? genome get together being for th? most part a composite of African and Europ?an g?n?alogi?s — ∼42% of th? social ?v?nt is gotten from a single provider of African American dive getting a bl?nd of African and Europ?an families — with simply a minor proportion of East Asian DNA being combined.

Sequencing of the sample DNAs

Figure 16: Sequencing statistics of sample DNA

Th? ?ndog?nous DNA cont?nt, th? d?gr?? of DNA that wanted to th? appropriate r?f?r?nc? genome, in each library. Th? 2 ssDNA library approaches r?cov?r?d ?ith?r mor? or a near d?gr?? of ?ndog?nous DNA diverged from th? dsDNA library approach for all of th? 5 concentrates. SsDNA2. 0 r?cov?r?d th? most raised d?gr?? of ?ndog?nous DNA for all concentrates, and SCR r?cov?r?d some plac? in th? scope of 72. 8% and 93. 1% of that r?cov?r?d by ssDNA2. 0 (Kapp et al. 2021). Th? 2 ssDNA methods mad? librari?s with relative ordinary area lengths and, for most models, mor? restricted typical piece lengths stood out from BEST. Th? ordinary piece length contrast b?tw??n th? SCR and ssDNA2. 0 librari?s went from 0. 18 bp to 3. 52 bp, and th? two philosophies achieved a relative segment length dispersal.

Librari?s organized with ssDNA2. 0 have a d?p?ndably higher repeat of terminal deamination on both th? 5′ and 3′ terminations diverged from th? SCR and BEST librari?s. Th? r?s?arch?rs have moreover s??n a terminal deamination disparity in basically all librari?s where th? 5′ end contains a higher sp??d of deamination diverged from th? 3′ end. Librari?s organized with th? SCR show th? most raised deamination imbalance all in all y?t AV005, which in lik? manner has th? passing common pick length and is likely going to b? th? most spoiled of th? 5 concentrates.

Recovery of old mitochondrial genomes utilizing the method of DNA extraction

Figure 17: Heat map produced through R package copilot

Despite modifications to reduce digestion t?mp?ratur? and duration, the success rate was comparable to studies using more destructive sampling. This study demonstrates the successful recovery of high-coverage mitochondrial genomes from Holocene subfossil bonds using a minimally destructive DNA extraction technique. Clear geographical biases were observed, with higher ?ndog?nous DNA yields from South Island specimens, likely due to more stable t?mp?ratur? enhancing preservation (Scarsbrook et al. 2023). The singl?-strand?d library preparation outperformed doubl?-strand?d methods in capturing degraded DNA fragments characteristic of the on exterior. Although ?nrichm?nt targeted mitochondrial DNA, most r?cov?r?d reads Whir non-diplodactylid, reflecting contamination and adapter dimer formation. S?v?r?ly recommendations are proposed to enhance performance: UV, chemical or enzymatic decontamination pr?-?xtraction; discarding initial digest fractions to reduce ?xog?nous DNA; substituting kit purification for specialized methods to r?cov?r?d shorter DNA fragments. Destructive preprocessing is contingent on specimen type and condition. Localized digestion could minimize damage to valuable materials.

The Tagging and Indexing approach

Figure 18: Structure of dual-tagged and dual-indexed met barcoding library sequence

The detailed analysis discusses different m?tabarcoding strategy for DNA sequencing, focusing on their relative PCR amplification biases and errors. It compares thr?? main approaches: on-stop PCR, two-stop PCR, and tagged PCR. The key diff?r?nc? relates to primer design, number of PCR steps, and risk of contamination or index misassignment. It is important to note that the additional PCR steps can introduce more errors like substitutions and chimeras. So approaches with fewer PCR amplifications have an advantage. However, all methods have some risk of reduced PCR ?ffici?ncy due to nucleotide additions on primers. One-stop PCR has the longest additions and likely that creates ?ffici?ncy. Two-stop PCR has shorter additions, Whil? tagged PCR has the shortest tags of 5-10 nucleotides (Bohmann et al. 2022). There is speculation tagged PCR may have the highest sensitivity for detecting taxa, but no formal comparisons.

The study also recommends optimizing PCRs regardless of strategy, by tracking inhibition and ?ffici?ncy issues. Adding unmodified primers or a pre-?nrichm?nt PCR are mentioned as ways to potentially improve ?ffici?ncy for on- and two-stop methods. However, this introduces more process complexity or contamination risks. There are inherent tradeoffs b?tw??n accuracy, sensitivity, workload, cost, and contamination risk across the different m?tabarcoding strategy. Whil? tagged PCR may have some advantages, the optimal approach depends on the specific study goals and design considerations. More comparative r?s?arch?rs on taxon detection across methods would help inform best practices.

Adjusting the PCR cycles using DNA dilution

Figure 19: Heat map of individual white blood cells

This literature review comprehensively ?xamin?d how reducing amplification reaction volume impacts STR profiling success and quality when genotyping single calls. The review also modelled ?xp?ct allele/locus dropout rates at low DNA inputs to benchmark the empirical results. The models predict high dropouts with only a little DNA template, equivalent to the full gnomic content of on call. This aligns with the finding that none of the kits achieved complete profiling success from single cells.

A key finding is that decreasing PCR volume leads to increased PCR sensitivity and higher RFUs, but also more artefacts and allele/locus dropouts at very low volumes with high DNA inputs. The review compares S?v?r?ly leading forensic DNA amplification kits - Safest, NGMD?t?ct, and Fusion 6C- systematically testing different reaction volumes on single white blood cells and sperm cells. The results indicate that NGMD?t?ct performs best overall for singl?-c?ll STR genotyping under the tested conditions. Importantly, a reduced reaction volume increases assay sensitivity without substantially increasing artefacts compared to the manufacturer’s recommendation. By evaluating multiple amplification regimes and chemistries on isolated cells, this review provides an improved understanding of the tradeoffs between sensitivity and artefacts than optimizing protocols for track DNA analysis (Bohmann et al. 2022).The results highlighted the difficulty of maximizing allele coverage from just on copy of a gnome, underscoring the stochastic limits of current STR typing technologies. Overall, the r?s?arch?rs demonstrate assay design and reaction volume as critical parameters than developing forensic genotyping tools for minimal DNA ?vid?nc?.

4.3 Discussion

The literature review and r?s?arch?rs articles provide valuable insights into ancient DNA (and) analysis using modern genetic technologies. A key theme is the tradeoffs b?tw??n different DNA extraction and sequencing methods when working with degraded or contaminated ancient samples.

Sequencing of the extraction model

The sequencing of the extraction model outlines a systematic workflow for recovering and emphasizing customized approaches based on samples preservation quality. Better pr?s?rv?d specimens should yield higher quality DNA, but all extraction protocols involve inherent DNA damage and loss (Shu et al. 2021). This highlights the n??d to tailor methods to samples conditions Whil? maximizing the yield. The inhibitor dynamics theory ?xamin?d how compounds in ancient samples inhibit DNA analysis, underscoring the importance of extraction methods that removed contaminants.Th? temporal degradation theory details how DNA fragmentation over time impacts analysis, suggesting matched extraction protocols depending on are and deterioration..

Reliability of the modern day DNA extraction methods

Th? strategies including mass residue tests and shotgun m?tag?nomic sequencing offer promising roads for removing antiquated DNA from different ecological sources. Thr?? methodologies have ?xhibit?d their adequacy in recovering hereditary material from different depositional conditions, traversing sedimentary stores to frigid ice. Shotgun m?tag?nomic sequencing, specifically, gives a thorough comprehension by breaking down all organismal DNA, upgrading check of DNA g?nuin?n?ss and working on our grip of past conditions. Notwithstanding, challenges p?rs?v?r? in regards to th? taphonomy of ecological DNA, including restricted information about statement pathways and variables affecting long haul safeguarding (Matsvay et al. 2019). In spite of strategic advances, th? dependability of thr?? methods for old DNA extraction relies on factors like pr?f?r?nc?s gnome accessibility and taphonomy processes, calling for consistent r?fin?m?nt and data set d?v?lopm?nt to improve their viability.

DNA recovery from sediments

Environmental DNA (Edna) from lake sediments or permafrost is a promising avenue for reconstructing pal?o?nvironm?nts. But as Kapp et al. (2021) discussed, rigorous controls and standardization is n??d to ?nsur?s sedimentary signals are valid temporal proxies. Murcia et al. demonstrated a novel target ?nrichm?nt approach that boosts on-target DNA recovery from sediments by over an order of magnitude, enabling sensitive identification of taxon pr?s?nt?d and turnover. Scarsbrook et al. (2021) detailed an extraction technique tailored for small subfossils that causes minimal specimen destruction. When combined with ?nrichm?nt, this unlocked Pl?istoc?n? mitog?nom?s from rare Now Zealand gecko’s und?t?ctabl? with conventional sampling.

Comparison of extraction method regarding DNA of ancient samples

Th? correlation b?tw??n extraction techniques for antiquated DNA tests uncovers unmistakable results in Salix and Xanthium species. Salix displays a higher ?xt?nt of inferior quality peruses, credited to short, harmed DNA sections from corrupt?d herbarium ?xampl?s. Strangely, PTB-DTT extraction yielded a larger number of peruses than Qian units, showing DNA focus' more prominent ?ff?cts than d?bas?m?nt levels. In Xanthium, half and half catch responses alleviated bad quality peruses, while locality issues surfaced because of post-catch PCR cycles. Standard twofold abandoned library planning in Salix held high ?xt?nt of ?ndog?nous DNA, especially obvious in th? most ?stablish?d ?xampl?s. Notwithstanding, for incredibly old herbarium ?xampl?s (>200 years), changed sanitization steps and singl?-abandon?d library readiness demonstrated profitable (Kirch et al. 2020). In Xanthium, target ?nhanc?m?nt showed guarant?? for more seasoned ?xampl?s yet demonstrated less viable for those north of 200 years, proposing substitute methodologies for old DNA recuperation.

Impact on modern day extraction method

Th? noticed ?xampl?s of nucleotide r?plac?m?nts, especially th? higher r?curr?nc? of C/T r?plac?m?nts at th? finishes of and sections, lines up with past discoveries on antiquated DNA d?bas?m?nt. While th? Neanderthal sequencing information ?xhibit?d a sharp lessening in C/T r?plac?m?nts after th? underlying five nucleotides, our review showed a slower downfall, remaining outstandingly higher r?v?nu? at th? fifth situation from th? 3'- end. This ?rror could propose varieties in corruption designs in light of th? ?xampl?s ar?, safeguarding conditions, or explicit DNA attributes (Kistler et al. 2023). Understanding thr?? subtleties is ?ss?ntial for precisely deciphering antiquated DNA successions and knowing valid hereditary data from likely pollution or d?bas?m?nt relics.

4.4 Conclusion

Finally, our detailed research and data analysis brought to light the complicated field of past DNA extraction techniques. The examination of the comparison showed small variations in performance and trustworthiness, providing crucial data for genetic research. Significant patterns and disparities in performance among various approaches have been found. In the future, scientists should use these lessons to make informed choices that are appropriate to specific research goals. The blend of data and knowledge underlines how important methodological precision is to decoding the genetic algorithms concealed in ancient DNA. By providing basic information, our work improves the reliability of genetic research carried out in historical and chronological contexts and directs the improvement of extraction processes.

Chapter 5: Conclusion and Recommendation

5.1 Introduction

In short, the examination of past DNA extraction techniques has shed light on the complicated field of genetic studies. This contrast analysis shows how various methods vary in their ?ff?ctiv?n?ss and reliability. Moving forward, to enhance the quality and durability of genetic research, scientists need to give careful consideration to what contextually applicable extraction methods are. In this specific chapter different types of objectives of this specific research work will be justified with the help of different

5.2 Linking With Objectives

The case study analysis aimed to assess the Systematic literature review done on the ancient DNA extraction methods enabling a complete efficacy and reliability for the study in genetics. Four key objectives framed the modern day impact of the extraction, application, sequencing, genotyping, besides measuring the reliability of the extraction processes.

“To analyze the impact of modern-day DNA extraction techniques on ancient DNA extraction”

The ?ff?ct of current DNA extraction methods on old DNA extraction is a basic part of hereditary investigations, requiring a compr?h?nsiv? examination of the current writing. As of late, progressions in DNA extraction advances have altogether impacted the field of pal?og?nomics. Customary techniques frequently confronted difficulties in acquiring top-notch DNA from antiquated ?xampl?s because of d?bas?m?nt, pollution, and restricted yields. Notwithstanding, contemporary methods, for example, silica-based section r?fin?m?nt, attractive dab innovations, and enzymatic methodologies have ?xhibit?d significant upgrades. These strategies ?xp?ct to improve the safeguarding, yield, and trustworthiness of antiquated DNA, tending to verifiable difficulties. Silica-based segment cleansing, for example, has acquired unmistakable quality for its productivity in filtering DNA from complex blends.

Its application in antiquated DNA extraction includes streamlining, restricting circumstances and elution cycles to boost yield while limiting ?xp?ct foreign substances. Attractive specific advancements offer benefits in computerization and versatility, considering the high-throughput handling of old ?xampl?s. Moreover, enzymatic methodologies, like the usage of Uracil-DNA Glycosylase (UDG) to eliminate posthumous DNA harm, add to the conservation of credible antiquated DNA arrangements. Besides, the examination will survey the ramifications of this method on the yield of required DNA, taking into account factors like example age, geological area, and example type. Additionally, the uprightness of old DNA, an urgent viewpoint for exact hereditary investigations, will be ?xamin?d, assessing the capacity of present-day extraction strategies to limit harm and guarantee the credibility of hereditary data obtained from old ?xampl?s.

“To compare the various extraction methods available”

In this specific section, the second objective of this study which was the comparison of various DNA extraction methods is mentioned. Different types of secondary data are analyzed in the above chapter of this study which contains analysis and understanding of a wide variety of DNA extraction processes. In the above-mentioned analysis, different types of extraction processes are analyzed properly with the implementation of various past journals and articles which was done in this given context of the analysis. It was found with the help of the secondary data analysis section of this project it was found that there are a wide variety of DNA extraction processes are present such as the organic extraction process which is the phenol-chloroform method, different types of non-organic process and also the silica or gel-based methods of the DNA extraction process from a cell of an organism. The identification and analysis process of these methods are done with the help of a comparative analysis of different past articles and research papers which was based on this specific topic of the DNA extraction process. So it can be identified that the specific objective of this entire project work was justified in the analysis work which was done in the secondary data analysis chapter of this study.

“To measure the reliability of these methods regarding the extraction of ancient DNA”

The basic target of the d?lib?rat? writing survey is to dig into the estimation of unwavering quality in old DNA extraction techniques. This involves a fastidious valuation of different extraction procedures concerning their viability intending to key difficulties like tainting, corruption, and reproducibility related to old hereditary material. The writing will be completely ?xamin?d to recognize and dissect concentrates that explicitly explore these issues, revealing insight into the qualities and impediments of various strategies.

The valuation of dependability will reach out past the extraction stage to ?nv?lop a basic assessment of the trial controls carried out by scientists. It will likewise include a definite investigation of approval methods to guarantee the realness of the old DNA groupings. Besides, the review will investigate the factual examinations utilized, meaning to assess the heartiness and precision of results produced through various extraction strategies. By underlining the significance of firm quality, the survey tries to give a far-reaching comprehension of the strategic contemplations that influence the constancy of old DNA information. This ?xt?nsiv? examination is fundamental for laying out accepted procedures in the field of pal?og?nomics, encouraging trust in the dependability of hereditary data obtained from old ?xampl?s, and working with additional exact reproductions of past populaces and developmental series.

“To compare the efficacy of these technologies during genetic studies”

The examination of the viability of different DNA extraction innovations applied to hereditary investigations comprises a vital part of the methodical writing survey. This fragment ?xp?cts to carefully evaluate how different extraction techniques impact downstream hereditary applications, including PCR intensification, sequencing, and genotyping. By examining existing writing, the survey looks to concentrate on that demanding report on the achi?v?m?nt rats, restrictions, and difficulties related to using antiquated DNA separated through assorted procedures in more ?xt?nsiv? hereditary examinations.

The adequacy of extraction procedures will be ?stimat?s in light of their ?ff?ct on the dependability and reproducibility of hereditary outcomes, taking into account factors like example quality, age, and ecological circumstances. Understanding the nuanced connection between extraction techniques and downstream hereditary applications is urgent for specialists trying to make significant inf?r?nc?s from old hereditary material. Generally, this segment adds to the more ?xt?nsiv? target of the writing survey by offering ?xp?ri?nc?s into the down-to-earth contemplations for scientists working with old hereditary material. By thoroughly assessing the viability of extraction advances in working with fruitful hereditary examinations, the survey means to illuminate best practices in the field regarding pal?og?nomics and improve the dependability of hereditary information obtained from old ?xampl?s. This relative examination will direct analysts in choosing ideal extraction techniques custom-made to explicit exploration targets, ?v?ntually propelling the general comprehension of old populaces and d?v?lopm?ntal cycles.

5.3 Recommendation

This dissertation provides a comprehensive systematic review comparing the efficacy and reliability of different ancient DNA extraction techniques, synthesizing ?vid?nc? from studies across the past d?cad?. The analysis rivals small but meaningful diff?r?nc? in performance between methods, off?rings crucial insights to inform genetics r?s?arch?rs. Whil? no approach clearly ?xc?ls across all contexts, notable patterns and tradeoffs ?m?rg?ncy across the types of techniques ?xamin?d. The researchers should apply lessons in selecting extraction protocols administered to their specific r?s?arch?rs objectives and samples characteristics of the sample.

In addition, continuing innovation around enzymatic digestion holds promise for less destructive sampling crucial for valuable museum materials. Ultimately r?s?arch?rs are needed to balance maximizing DNA recovery against minimally damaging specimens. But this thoughtful synthesis of comparative data across varied samples types, ranges, and techniques provides an invaluable knowledge base for making cont?xt-sp?cific method selections. By elucidating technical complexities, this dissertation promotes improved reliability of ancient DNA r?s?arch?rs overall, from study design through ?vid?nc?-based inf?r?nc?s about past populations and evolutionary ?xp?rts. Its comprehensive analysis sets directional for the field through both practical guidance and highlighting fruitful areas for further extraction r?fin?m?nts.

5.4 Conclusion

Several settings of usefulness and reliability in genetic studies are shown by the compared contrast of previous DNA extraction techniques. The findings underscore the necessity for careful methodology and cont?xt-awar? making choices in future research. For the best results in ancient DNA examinations, tailored methods based on particular DNA and past vents are advised. This study's careful examination of several previous methods for obtaining DNA resulted in the conclusion that reliability and ?ff?ctiv?n?ss in genetic research interact in a complicated manner. The diversity of findings underlines how crucial it is to choose extraction methods wisely. In the future, scientific correctness should be given top priority by r?s?arch?rs, taking context and the composition of genetic material into mind. It is advised to use an individual approach for every study that takes now d?v?lopm?nts in extraction ?quipm?nt into account to boost overall reliability. In order to improve our understanding of d?v?lopm?ntal and past events and to solve the mysteries covered in ancient DNA, these recommendations aim to improve the precision and durability of genetic studies.

References

Journals

Abdelmanova, A.S., Kharzinova, V.R., Volkova, V.V., Mishina, A.I., Dotsev, A.V., Sermyagin, A.A., Boronetskaya, O.I., Petrikeeva, L.V., Chinarov, R.Y., Brem, G. and Zinovieva, N.A., 2020. Genetic diversity of historical and modern populations of Russian cattle breeds revealed by microsatellite analysis. Genes, 11(8), p.940.

Abu Bakar, A., Mahinderjit Singh, M. and Mohd Shariff, A.R., 2021. A Privacy Preservation Quality of Service (QoS) Model for Data Exposure in Android Smartphone Usage. Sensors, 21(5), p.1667.

Abu Bakar, A., Mahinderjit Singh, M. and Mohd Shariff, A.R., 2021. A Privacy Preservation Quality of Service (QoS) Model for Data Exposure in Android Smartphone Usage. Sensors, 21(5), p.1667.

Allio, R., Schomaker?Bastos, A., Romiguier, J., Prosdocimi, F., Nabholz, B. and Delsuc, F., 2020. MitoFinder: Efficient automated large?scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Molecular Ecology Resources, 20(4), pp.892-905.

Allio, R., Schomaker?Bastos, A., Romiguier, J., Prosdocimi, F., Nabholz, B. and Delsuc, F., 2020. MitoFinder: Efficient automated large?scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Molecular Ecology Resources, 20(4), pp.892-905.

Arbøll, T.P., Rasmussen, S.L., de Jonge, N., Hansen, A.H., Pertoldi, C. and Nielsen, J.L., 2023. Revealing the secrets of a 2900-year-old clay brick, discovering a time capsule of ancient DNA. Scientific Reports, 13(1), p.13092.

Bo, X.I.A.O., Gui-Lian, S.H.E.N.G., Jun-Xia, Y.U.A.N., Si-Ren, W.A.N.G., Jia-Ming, H.U., Shun-Gang, C.H.E.N., Hai-Long, J.I., Xin-Dong, H.O.U. and Xu-Long, L.A.I., 2020. Ancient DNA molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of Cervinae subfossils from Northeast China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 58(4), p.328.

Bohmann, K., Elbrecht, V., Carøe, C., Bista, I., Leese, F., Bunce, M., Yu, D.W., Seymour, M., Dumbrell, A.J. and Creer, S., 2022. Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies. Molecular Ecology Resources, 22(4), pp.1231-1246.

Bohmann, K., Elbrecht, V., Carøe, C., Bista, I., Leese, F.,Bunce, M., Yu, D.W., Seymour, M., Dumbrell, A.J. and Creer, S., 2022.Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies. Molecular Ecology Resources, 22(4), pp.1231-1246.

Bouby, L.,Wales, N., Jalabadze, M., Rusishvili, N., Bonhomme, V., Ramos-Madrigal, J.,Evin, A., Ivorra, S., Lacombe, T., Pagnoux, C. and Boaretto, E., 2021. Tracking the history of grapevine cultivation in Georgia by combining geometric morphometrics and ancient DNA. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 30, pp.63-76.

Briggs, L., 2020. Ancient DNA research in maritime and underwater archaeology: pitfalls, promise, and future directions. Open Quaternary, 6(1).

Capo, E., Giguet-Covex, C., Rouillard, A., Nota, K., Heintzman, P.D., Vuillemin, A., Ariztegui, D., Arnaud, F., Belle, S., Bertilsson, S. and Bigler, C., 2021. Lake sedimentary DNA research on past terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity: Overview and recommendations. Quaternary, 4(1), p.6.

Castañeda-Rico, S., León-Paniagua, L., Edwards, C.W. and Maldonado, J.E., 2020. Ancient DNA from museum specimens and next generation sequencing help resolve the controversial evolutionary history of the critically endangered Puebla deer mouse. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8, p.94.

Ciftci, A., De?irmenci, F.O., Luke, C., Roosevelt, C.H., Marston, J.M. and Kaya, Z., 2019. Ancient DNA (aDNA) extraction and amplification from 3500-year-old charred economic crop seeds from Kaymakç? in Western Turkey: comparative sequence analysis using the 26S rDNA gene. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 66, pp.1279-1294.

Dehasque, M., Ávila-Arcos, M.C., Díez-del-Molino, D., Fumagalli, M., Guschanski, K., Lorenzen, E.D., Malaspinas, A.S., Marques-Bonet, T., Martin, M.D., Murray, G.G. and Papadopulos, A.S., 2020. Inference of natural selection from ancient DNA. Evolution Letters, 4(2), pp.94-108.

Dehasque, M., Ávila-Arcos, M.C., Díez-del-Molino, D., Fumagalli, M., Guschanski, K., Lorenzen, E.D., Malaspinas, A.S., Marques-Bonet, T., Martin, M.D., Murray, G.G. and Papadopulos, A.S., 2020. Inference of natural selection from ancient DNA. Evolution Letters, 4(2), pp.94-108.

Der Sarkissian, C., Möller, P., Hofman, C.A., Ilsøe, P., Rick, T.C., Schiøtte, T., Sørensen, M.V., Dalén, L. and Orlando, L., 2020. Unveiling the ecological applications of ancient DNA from mollusk shells. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8, p.37.

Der Sarkissian, C., Möller, P., Hofman, C.A., Ilsøe, P., Rick, T.C., Schiøtte, T., Sørensen, M.V., Dalén, L. and Orlando, L., 2020. Unveiling the ecological applications of ancient DNA from mollusk shells. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8, p.37.

Der Sarkissian, C., Möller, P., Hofman, C.A., Ilsøe, P., Rick, T.C., Schiøtte, T., Sørensen, M.V., Dalén, L. and Orlando, L., 2020. Unveiling the ecological applications of ancient DNA from mollusk shells. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8, p.37.

Diaz-Maroto, P., Rey-Iglesia, A., Cartajena, I., Núñez, L., Westbury, M.V., Varas, V., Moraga, M., Campos, P.F., Orozco-terWengel, P., Marin, J.C. and Hansen, A.J., 2021. Ancient DNA reveals the lost domestication history of South American camelids in Northern Chile and across the Andes. Elife, 10, p.e63390.

Feldman, M., Master, D.M., Bianco, R.A., Burri, M., Stockhammer, P.W., Mittnik, A., Aja, A.J., Jeong, C. and Krause, J., 2019. Ancient DNA sheds light on the genetic origins of early Iron Age Philistines. Science Advances, 5(7), p.eaax0061.

Feldman, M., Master, D.M., Bianco, R.A., Burri, M., Stockhammer, P.W., Mittnik, A., Aja, A.J., Jeong, C. and Krause, J., 2019. Ancient DNA sheds light on the genetic origins of early Iron Age Philistines. Science Advances, 5(7), p.eaax0061.

Hofreiter, M., Sneberger, J., Pospisek, M. and Vanek, D., 2021. Progress in forensic bone DNA analysis: Lessons learned from ancient DNA. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 54, p.102538.

Humphrey, L. and Bouzouggar, A., 2023. Ancient DNA reveals how farming spread into northwest Africa.

Ide, S., Imai, R., Ochi, H. and Maeshima, K., 2020. Transcriptional suppression of ribosomal DNA with phase separation. Science advances, 6(42), p.eabb5953.

Ide, S., Imai, R., Ochi, H. and Maeshima, K., 2020. Transcriptional suppression of ribosomal DNA with phase separation. Science advances, 6(42), p.eabb5953.

Irving-Pease, E.K., Muktupavela, R., Dannemann, M. and Racimo, F., 2021. Quantitative human paleogenetics: What can ancient DNA tell us about complex trait evolution?. Frontiers in Genetics, 12, p.703541.

Izarraras-Gomez, A. and Ortega-Del Vecchyo, D., 2023. Ancient DNA uncovers past migrations in California.

Jiao, L., Lu, Y., He, T., Guo, J. and Yin, Y., 2020. DNA barcoding for wood identification: Global review of the last decade and future perspective. IAWA Journal, 41(4), pp.620-643.

Kapp, J.D., Green, R.E. and Shapiro, B., 2021. A fast and efficient single-stranded genomic library preparation method optimized for ancient DNA. Journal of Heredity, 112(3), pp.241-249.

Kashuba, N., K?rdök, E., Damlien, H., Manninen, M.A., Nordqvist, B., Persson, P. and Götherström, A., 2019. Ancient DNA from mastics solidifies connection between material culture and genetics of mesolithic hunter–gatherers in Scandinavia. Communications Biology, 2(1), p.185.

Kirch, M., Romundset, A., Gilbert, M.T.P., Jones, F.C. and Foote, A.D., 2021. Ancient and modern stickleback genomes reveal the demographic constraints on adaptation. Current Biology, 31(9), pp.2027-2036.

Kistler, L., Bieker, V.C., Martin, M.D., Pedersen, M.W., Ramos Madrigal, J. and Wales, N., 2020. Ancient plant genomics in archaeology, herbaria, and the environment. Annual review of plant biology, 71, pp.605-629.

Kistler, L., Bieker, V.C., Martin, M.D., Pedersen, M.W., Ramos Madrigal, J. and Wales, N., 2020. Ancient plant genomics in archaeology, herbaria, and the environment. Annual review of plant biology, 71, pp.605-629.

Kyalo?Omamo, M., Junginger, A., Krueger, J., Epp, L.S., Stoof?Leichsenring, K.R., Rohland, S., Trauth, M.H. and Tiedemann, R., 2023. Sedimentary ancient DNA of rotifers reveals responses to 200 years of climate change in two Kenyan crater lakes. Freshwater Biology.

Lan, T. and Lindqvist, C., 2019. Paleogenomics: genome-scale analysis of ancient DNA and population and evolutionary genomic inferences. Population Genomics: concepts, approaches and applications, pp.323-360.

Laporte, M., Reny?Nolin, E., Chouinard, V., Hernandez, C., Normandeau, E., Bougas, B., Côté, C., Behmel, S. and Bernatchez, L., 2021. Proper environmental DNA metabarcoding data transformation reveals temporal stability of fish communities in a dendritic river system. Environmental DNA, 3(5), pp.1007-1022.

Laporte, M., Reny?Nolin, E., Chouinard, V., Hernandez, C., Normandeau, E., Bougas, B., Côté, C., Behmel, S. and Bernatchez, L., 2021. Proper environmental DNA metabarcoding data transformation reveals temporal stability of fish communities in a dendritic river system. Environmental DNA, 3(5), pp.1007-1022.

Lien, A., Pestana Legori, L., Kraft, L., Wad Sackett, P. and Renaud, G., 2023. Benchmarking software tools for trimming adapters and merging next-generation sequencing data for ancient DNA. bioRxiv, pp.2023-07.

Martínez-García, L., Ferrari, G., Cuevas, A., Atmore, L.M., López-Arias, B., Culling, M., Llorente-Rodríguez, L., Morales-Muñiz, A., Roselló-Izquierdo, E., Quirós, J.A. and Marlasca-Martín, R., 2022. Ancient DNA evidence for the ecological globalization of cod fishing in medieval and post-medieval Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 289(1985), p.20221107.

Martuszewski,A., Paluszkiewicz, P., Król, M., Banasik, M. and Kepinska, M., 2021. Donor-derived cell-free DNA in kidney transplantation as a potential rejection biomarker: a systematic literature review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(2), p.193.

Matsvay, A.D., Alborova, I.E., Pimkina, E.V., Markelov, M.L., Khafizov, K. and Mustafin, K.K., 2019. Experimental approaches for ancient DNA extraction and sample preparation for next generation sequencing in ultra-clean conditions. Conservation genetics resources, 11, pp.345-353.

McHugo, G.P., Dover, M.J. and MacHugh, D.E., 2019. Unlocking the origins and biology of domestic animals using ancient DNA and paleogenomics. BMC biology, 17, pp.1-20.

Mitchell, K.J., 2021. Ancient DNA from the koala lemur puts Madagascar on the paleogenomic map. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(30), p.e2110218118.

Murchie, T.J., Kuch, M., Duggan, A.T., Ledger, M.L., Roche, K., Klunk, J., Karpinski, E., Hackenberger, D., Sadoway, T., MacPhee, R. and Froese, D., 2021. Optimizing extraction and targeted capture of ancient environmental DNA for reconstructing past environments using the PalaeoChip Arctic-1.0 bait-set. Quaternary Research, 99, pp.305-328.

Oikkonen, V., 2020. Entanglements of time, temperature, technology, and place in ancient DNA research: The case of the Denisovan Hominin. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(6), pp.1119-1141.

Oliva, A., Tobler, R., Cooper, A., Llamas, B. and Souilmi, Y., 2021. Systematic benchmark of ancient DNA read mapping. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22(5), p.bbab076.Oliva, A.,Tobler, R., Cooper, A., Llamas, B. and Souilmi, Y., 2021. Systematic benchmark of ancient DNA read mapping. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22(5), p.bbab076.

Orlando, L., Allaby, R., Skoglund, P., Der Sarkissian, C., Stockhammer, P.W., Ávila-Arcos, M.C., Fu, Q., Krause, J., Willerslev, E., Stone, A.C. and Warinner, C., 2021. Ancient DNA analysis. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), p.14.

Orlando, L., Allaby, R., Skoglund, P., Der Sarkissian, C., Stockhammer, P.W., Ávila-Arcos, M.C., Fu, Q., Krause, J., Willerslev, E., Stone, A.C. and Warinner, C., 2021. Ancient DNA analysis. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), p.14.

Orlando, L., Allaby, R., Skoglund, P., Der Sarkissian, C., Stockhammer, P.W., Ávila-Arcos, M.C., Fu, Q., Krause, J., Willerslev, E., Stone, A.C. and Warinner, C., 2021. Ancient DNA analysis. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), p.14.

Parker, C.E., Bos, K.I., Haak, W. and Krause, J., 2021. Optimized bone sampling protocols for the retrieval of ancient DNA from archaeological remains. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments), (177), p.e63250.

Petrou, E.L., Kopperl, R., Lepofsky, D., Rodrigues, A.T., Yang, D., Moss, M.L., Speller, C.F. and Hauser, L., 2022. Ancient DNA reveals phenological diversity of Coast Salish herring harvests over multiple centuries. Scientific Reports, 12(1), p.13512.

Peyrégne, S. and Prüfer, K., 2020. Present?Day DNA Contamination in Ancient DNA Datasets. BioEssays, 42(9), p.2000081.

Qi, M., Liang, B., Zhang, L., Ma, X., Yan, L., Dong, W., Kong, D., Zhang, L., Zhu, H., Gao, S.H. and Jiang, J., 2021. Microbial interactions drive the complete catabolism of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole in activated sludge microbiomes. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(5), pp.3270-3282.

Qi, M., Liang, B., Zhang, L., Ma, X., Yan, L., Dong, W., Kong, D., Zhang, L., Zhu, H., Gao, S.H. and Jiang, J., 2021. Microbial interactions drive the complete catabolism of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole in activated sludge microbiomes. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(5), pp.3270-3282.

Rijal, D.P., Heintzman, P.D., Lammers, Y., Yoccoz, N.G., Lorberau, K.E., Pitelkova, I., Goslar, T., Murguzur, F.J., Salonen, J.S., Helmens, K.F. and Bakke, J., 2021. Sedimentary ancient DNA shows terrestrial plant richness continuously increased over the Holocene in northern Fennoscandia. Science Advances, 7(31), p.eabf9557.

Scarsbrook, L., Verry, A.J., Walton, K., Hitchmough, R.A. and Rawlence, N.J., 2023. Ancient mitochondrial genomes recovered from small vertebrate bones through minimally destructive DNA extraction: Phylogeography of the New Zealand gecko genus Hoplodactylus. Molecular Ecology, 32(11), pp.2964-2984.

Schablitsky, J.M., Witt, K.E., Madrigal, J.R., Ellegaard, M.R., Malhi, R.S. and Schroeder, H., 2019. Ancient DNA analysis of a nineteenth century tobacco pipe from a Maryland slave quarter. Journal of Archaeological Science, 105, pp.11-18.

Shu, L., Ludwig,A. and Peng, Z., 2020. Standards for methods utilizing environmental DNA for detection of fish species. Genes, 11(3), p.296.

Sun, X.F., Wen, S.Q., Lu, C.Q., Zhou, B.Y., Curnoe, D., Lu, H.Y., Li, H.C., Wang, W., Cheng, H., Yi, S.W. and Jia, X., 2021. Ancient DNA and multimethod dating confirm the late arrival of anatomically modern humans in southern China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8), p.e2019158118.

van der Valk, T., Vezzi, F., Ormestad, M., Dalén, L. and Guschanski, K., 2020. Index hopping on the Illumina HiseqX platform and its consequences for ancient DNA studies. Molecular Ecology Resources, 20(5), pp.1171-1181.

Verry, A.J., Lubbe, P., Mitchell, K.J. and Rawlence, N.J., 2023. Thirty years of ancient DNA and the faunal biogeography of Aotearoa New Zealand: lessons and future directions. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 54(1), pp.75-97.

Yang, F., Sun, J., Luo, H., Ren, H., Zhou, H., Lin, Y., Han, M., Chen, B., Liao, H., Brix, S. and Li, J., 2020. Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies. Gigascience, 9(7), p.giaa071.

Yang, M.A., Fan, X., Sun, B., Chen, C., Lang, J., Ko, Y.C., Tsang, C.H., Chiu, H., Wang, T., Bao, Q. and Wu, X., 2020. Ancient DNA indicates human population shifts and admixture in northern and southern China. Science, 369(6501), pp.282-288.

Zhao, R., Xu, W., Su, H. and Ji, Q., 2019. Bayesian hierarchical dynamic model for human action recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 7733-7742).